IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/mpifgs/65.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Wandel trotz Reformstau: Die Politik der beruflichen Bildung seit 1970

Author

Listed:
  • Busemeyer, Marius R.

Abstract

Das deutsche Berufsbildungssystem ist im Wandel. Doch dieser Wandlungsprozess entfaltet sich nicht in großen Reformprojekten, sondern in Form von kleinen Schritten, die - über einen langen Zeitraum betrachtet - das System als Ganzes deutlich verändert haben. Das Buch zeichnet diesen Prozess des inkrementellen, aber transformativen Wandels im Zugang zu Ausbildung, ihrer Finanzierung sowie der Ausbildungsbeteiligung von Unternehmen nach. Darüber hinaus nimmt es aber vor allem die Politik der beruflichen Bildung im eigentlichen Sinn in den Blick und dokumentiert politische Debatten und Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Gewerkschaften, Arbeitgebern und staatlichen Akteuren während der letzten vier Jahrzehnte. Außerdem wird argumentiert, dass eine Berücksichtigung der Veränderungsprozesse im Bereich der Arbeitsbeziehungen zu einem besseren Verständnis der politischen Geschichte der beruflichen Bildung in Deutschland beitragen kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Busemeyer, Marius R., 2009. "Wandel trotz Reformstau: Die Politik der beruflichen Bildung seit 1970," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 65, number 65.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/69256/1/726272248.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geny Piotti, 2011. "Conversion as a Mechanism of Hybridization: The Institutional Transfer of Industrial Relations and Vocational Training from Western to Eastern Germany," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(3), pages 397-409, June.
    2. Busemeyer, Marius R., 2011. "Varieties of cross-class coalitions in the politics of dualization: Insights from the case of vocational training in Germany," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Paul Ryan & Uschi Backes-Gellner & Silvia Teuber & Karin Wagner, 2012. "Apprentice pay in Britain, Germany and Switzerland: institutions, market forces, market power," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0075, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    4. Marius R. Busemeyer, 2012. "Business as a Pivotal Actor in the Politics of Training Reform: Insights from the Case of Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 690-713, December.
    5. Marius R Busemeyer & Martin B Carstensen & Patrick Emmenegger, 2022. "Orchestrators of coordination: Towards a new role of the state in coordinated capitalism?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(2), pages 231-250, June.
    6. Jansen, A., 2016. "Is investing in apprentices related to decision-makers’ altruism and their high time preference?," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    7. Markowitsch, Jörg & Hefler, Günter, 2018. "Staying in the loop: Formal feedback mechanisms connecting vocational training to the world of work in Europe," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 5(4), pages 285-306.
    8. Jansen, A., 2016. "Is investing in apprentices related to decision-makers' altruism and their high time preference?," ROA Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    9. Neubäumer, Renate, 2016. "Does Less Wage Compression Lead to Less Training in Germany? An Expansion of Acemoglu and Pischke's Model of Training in Imperfect Labor Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 9813, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.