IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v16y2018i1p40-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Model to Investigate the Effect of Work Ethic Culture on Dynamics of Rework in Management of Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Kiani

    (Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), School of Industrial Engineering, Tehran, Iran)

  • Seyed Hossein Hosseini

    (Model-based Management Systems Engineering Institute (SAMAM), Tehran, Iran)

  • Farshid Abdi

    (Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), School of Industrial Engineering, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the effect of work ethic culture on rework in construction projects through a review of literature, surveys, and interviews with project managers. The main research question is what mechanisms can project manager use to balance the costs of personnel training, financial and language incentives, and implementation costs to finish the project with more profit and less rework. In this regard, modelling and data analysis is done using System Dynamics methodology. The results show that by considering work ethic, rework in the project is reduced from 46 % to 39 %. However, the project has been completed with 10 % lower cost and 26 % lower variance. Integrating the issue of rework with the culture of work ethic in the field of project management by at least one exogenous parameter has been studied, while in this study qualitative parameters have been converted to quantitative parameters using fuzzy inference system. The change in management approach to the issue of work ethics and the formulation of human resource strategies of large projects by human resource managers is one of the applications of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Kiani & Seyed Hossein Hosseini & Farshid Abdi, 2018. "A Model to Investigate the Effect of Work Ethic Culture on Dynamics of Rework in Management of Projects," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(1), pages 40-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:40-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp40-59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C Eden & T Williams & F Ackermann & S Howick, 2000. "The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(3), pages 291-300, March.
    2. Tim Taylor & David N. Ford, 2006. "Tipping point failure and robustness in single development projects," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 22(1), pages 51-71, March.
    3. P. E. D. Love & P. Mandal & H. Li, 1999. "Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 505-517.
    4. Hosseini, Seyed Hossein & Shakouri G., Hamed, 2016. "A study on the future of unconventional oil development under different oil price scenarios: A system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 64-74.
    5. Babak Saleck Pay & Seyed Hossein Hosseini & Hamed G. Shakouri, 2013. "Why do Students use Virtual Social Networks in Iran: a System Approach," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 108-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Roohollah Taherkhani & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Shohreh Moradi, 2022. "Performance Prediction of Construction Projects Based on the Causes of Claims: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Daniel Inman & Brian Bush & Emily Newes & Corey Peck & Steven Peterson, 2020. "A technique for generating supply and demand curves from system dynamics models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(3), pages 373-384, July.
    4. Hosang Hyun & Hyunsoo Kim & Hyun-Soo Lee & Moonseo Park & Jeonghoon Lee, 2020. "Integrated Design Process for Modular Construction Projects to Reduce Rework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Dahl, Roy Endré & Lorentzen, Sindre & Oglend, Atle & Osmundsen, Petter, 2017. "Pro-cyclical petroleum investments and cost overruns in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 68-78.
    6. F Ackermann & C Eden & T Williams & S Howick, 2007. "Systemic risk assessment: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(1), pages 39-51, January.
    7. Hosseini, Seyed Hossein & Shakouri G., Hamed & Kazemi, Aliyeh, 2021. "Oil price future regarding unconventional oil production and its near-term deployment: A system dynamics approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Hendalianpour, Ayad & Liu, Peide & Amirghodsi, Sirous & Hamzehlou, Mohammad, 2022. "Designing a System Dynamics model to simulate criteria affecting oil and gas development contracts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Auping, Willem L. & Pruyt, Erik & de Jong, Sijbren & Kwakkel, Jan H., 2016. "The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 390-399.
    10. Yehiel Rosenfeld, 2009. "Cost of quality versus cost of non-quality in construction: the crucial balance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-117.
    11. D F Cioffi & H Khamooshi, 2009. "A practical method of determining project risk contingency budgets," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 565-571, April.
    12. Hajiebrahimi Farashah, Vahid & Sazvar, Zeinab & Hosseini, Seyed Hossein, 2021. "A dynamic model to formulate effective capacity expansion policies in Iranian petrochemical Industry to complete the value chain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    13. Davies, Megan & Musango, Josephine K. & Brent, Alan C., 2016. "A systems approach to understanding the effect of Facebook use on the quality of interpersonal communication," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 55-65.
    14. Delannoy, Louis & Longaretti, Pierre-Yves & Murphy, David J. & Prados, Emmanuel, 2021. "Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    15. Fatemeh Mostofi & Vedat Toğan & Yunus Emre Ayözen & Onur Behzat Tokdemir, 2022. "Predicting the Impact of Construction Rework Cost Using an Ensemble Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Bloomfield, Katherine & Williams, Terry & Bovis, Chris & Merali, Yasmin, 2019. "Systemic risk in major public contracts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 667-676.
    17. Luz Stella Cardona-Meza & Gerard Olivar-Tost, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of Project Management through the PMBOK® Standard Using Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    18. Mohsin, M. & Zhou, P. & Iqbal, N. & Shah, S.A.A., 2018. "Assessing oil supply security of South Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 438-447.
    19. Eze Emmanuel Chidiebere & Idiake John Ebhohimen & Ganiyu Bashir Olanrewaju, 2018. "Analysis of Rework Risk Triggers in the Nigerian Construction Industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1778-1793, August.
    20. Ansari, Dawud, 2017. "OPEC, Saudi Arabia, and the shale revolution: Insights from equilibrium modelling and oil politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 111, pages 166-178.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    work ethic; system dynamics; rework; project management; construction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:40-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.