IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/213992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User illusion: ideological construction of 'user-generated content' in the EC consultation on copyright

Author

Listed:
  • Erickson, Kristofer

Abstract

Recent policy consultations by the UK Intellectual Property Office, the US Patent and Trademark Office and the European Commission (EC) have highlighted the importance of user-generated content in debates to reform copyright. User-generated content (UGC) – often combining existing copyright material with transformative creativity – remains a contested terrain, with no clear or widely accepted definition. This paper examines how various stakeholders in the 2014 EC consultation on copyright attempted to shape the definition of UGC in order to suit their interests, sometimes aligning or conflicting with other stakeholder groups. Data from 203 written responses by registered stakeholders (authors, platform intermediaries and users) were subjected to a discourse analysis methodology. Key arguments and policy preferences from each stakeholder group are identified and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Erickson, Kristofer, 2014. "User illusion: ideological construction of 'user-generated content' in the EC consultation on copyright," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:213992
    DOI: 10.14763/2014.4.331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/213992/1/IntPolRev-2014-4-331.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2014.4.331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Towse, 2014. "Advanced Introduction to Cultural Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15186.
    2. Eve Chiapello & Norman Fairclough, 2002. "Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism," Post-Print hal-00466541, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia Livingstone & Peter Lunt, 2007. "Representing Citizens and Consumers in Media and Communications Regulation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 51-65, May.
    2. Graz Jean-Christophe & Hauert Christophe, 2014. "Beyond the transatlantic divide: the multiple authorities of standards in the global political economy of services," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 113-150, April.
    3. Laura Girella, 2013. "Regulating through the "Logic of Appropriateness" and the "Rhetoric of the Expert": The Role of Consultants in the Case of Intangibles Reporting in Germany," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 75-109.
    4. Fredrick Ajwang & Saurabh Arora & Joanes Atela & Joel Onyango & Mohammad Kyari, 2023. "Enabling modernisation, marginalising alternatives? Kenya's agricultural policy and smallholders," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 3-20, January.
    5. Thomas Diefenbach & Rune Todnem By & Patricia Klarner, 2009. "A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Managers’ Power – Functional, Socio-political, Interpretive-discursive, and Socio-cultural Approaches," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 20(4), pages 413-431.
    6. Muhammad Aqeel Awan & Daniela Pianezzi, 2023. "Constructing subjects that matter: A case of conditional recognition for Pakistani Khawajasiras," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1124-1141, May.
    7. Ghafele, Roya, 2010. "Of war and peace: analyzing the policy discourse on intellectual property," MPRA Paper 38091, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Doris Sommer & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2019. "Optimism of the Will. Antonio Gramsci Takes in Max Weber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Maria Medina-Vicent, 2020. "A Tendency to Essentialism? Discourses about Women’s Leadership," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Mafalda Gómez-Vega & Luis César Herrero-Prieto, 2019. "Measuring emotion through quality: evaluating the musical repertoires of Spanish symphony orchestras," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(2), pages 211-245, June.
    11. Bruno S. Frey & Andre Briviba, 2023. "Two types of cultural economics," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(1), pages 1-9, March.
    12. Daniel Nyberg & Christopher Wright, 2012. "Justifying Business Responses to Climate Change: Discursive Strategies of Similarity and Difference," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1819-1835, August.
    13. Gazi Islam & Roberta Sferrazzo, 2022. "Workers' Rites: Ritual Mediations and the Tensions of New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 284-318, March.
    14. Florence Bétrisey & Valérie Boisvert & James Sumberg, 2022. "Superweed amaranth: metaphor and the power of a threatening discourse," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 505-520, June.
    15. German Varas & Omar Sabaj & Clay Spinuzzi & Miguel Fuentes & Valentin Gerard & Paula Cabezas, 2023. "Value Creation in Start-Up Discourse: Linking Pitch and Venture Through Logics of Justification," Post-Print hal-03972594, HAL.
    16. Geng Chen & Pei Tang, 2021. "Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 459-490, September.
    17. Jen Snowball & Delon Tarentaal & Jonathan Sapsed, 2021. "Innovation and diversity in the digital cultural and creative industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 705-733, December.
    18. Xu Sun & Xiaosong Zhou & Qingfeng Wang & Pinyan Tang & Effie Lai-Chong Law & Sue Cobb, 2021. "Understanding attitudes towards intellectual property from the perspective of design professionals," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 521-543, June.
    19. Matthew Haigh, 2011. "Climate policy and financial institutions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 1367-1385, November.
    20. Humberstone, Barbara, 2009. "Sport management, gender and the 'bigger picture': Challenging changes in Higher Education--A partial auto/ethnographical account," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 255-262, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:213992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.