IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/215914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betriebliche Mitwirkung in der Schweiz – eine Untersuchung der Bestimmungen in Gesamtarbeitsverträgen
[Workplace-level employee participation in Switzerland – an inquiry of provisions in collective agreements]

Author

Listed:
  • Ziltener, Patrick
  • Gabathuler, Heinz

Abstract

Unser Beitrag untersucht in systematischer Weise die Regelungen zur betrieblichen Mitwirkung in Tarifverträgen (Gesamtarbeitsverträgen) in der Schweiz. Er geht von der These aus, dass wegen der späten Kodifizierung der Mitwirkung die formalen und inhaltlichen Kompetenzen von gewählten Arbeitnehmervertretungen in Tarifverträgen häufig über die gesetzlichen Bestimmungen hinausgehen. Wir widmen uns insbesondere Aspekten der „Verbetrieblichung“, d.h. der Verlagerung von Verhandlungskompetenzen von der Branchen- auf die Betriebsebene und zugleich von den Gewerkschaften auf die betrieblichen Arbeitnehmervertretungen. Es finden sich tatsächlich sehr häufig Bestimmungen, die über die gesetzlichen hinausgehen, auch wenn insgesamt das Niveau der Mitwirkungsrechte schweizerischer ArbeitnehmerInnen im europäischen Vergleich niedrig bleibt. Auch ein Einfluss der Gesetzgebung auf die vertraglichen Regelungen kann nachgewiesen werden – diese nahmen seit der Kodifizierung tendenziell zu ‒, während die Bedeutung der „Verbetrieblichung“ in der bisherigen Literatur wahrscheinlich überschätzt wurde.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziltener, Patrick & Gabathuler, Heinz, 2018. "Betriebliche Mitwirkung in der Schweiz – eine Untersuchung der Bestimmungen in Gesamtarbeitsverträgen [Workplace-level employee participation in Switzerland – an inquiry of provisions in collective," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(1), pages 5-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:215914
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v25i1.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/215914/1/indbez-v25i1p005-026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v25i1.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "Works Councils in Western Europe: From Consultation to Participation," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 313-350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "The Study of Works Councils: Concepts and Problems," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 3-26, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number roge95-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steffen Mueller, 2012. "Works Councils and Establishment Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(4), pages 880-898, October.
    2. Steffen Mueller & Jens Stegmaier, 2017. "The Dynamic Effects of Works Councils on Labour Productivity: First Evidence from Panel Data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 372-395, June.
    3. Felix FitzRoy & Kornelius Kraft, 2005. "Co‐determination, Efficiency and Productivity," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 233-247, June.
    4. Niamh Hardiman, 2006. "Politics and Social Partnership - Flexible Network Governance," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 37(3), pages 343-374.
    5. Markey, R. & Pomfret, S., 2001. "Managers' Perceptions of Cooperation and Joint Decision-Making with Trade Unions: A Regional Case Study in the Illawarra (Australia)," Economics Working Papers wp01-13, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    6. Robert Boyer, 2005. "What future for codetermination and corporate governance in Germany?," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590710, HAL.
    7. Steffen Mueller, 2009. "The Productivity Effect of Non-Union Representation," Working Papers 074, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    8. Jürgens, Ulrich & Lippert, Inge, 2005. "Kommunikation und Wissen im Aufsichtsrat: Voraussetzungen und Kriterien guter Aufsichtsratsarbeit aus der Perspektive leitender Angestellter," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2005-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Jan Ekke Wigboldus & Jan Kees Looise & Andr351 Nijhof, 2008. "Understanding the Effects of Works Councils on Organizational Performance. A Theoretical Model and Results from Initial Case Studies from the Netherlands," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(4), pages 307-323.
    10. J.E. van den Berg, 2003. "The Dutch Works Council from an Institutional Economics Point of View: An Efficient Solution to the Governance Structure Problem?," Working Papers 03-06, Utrecht School of Economics.
    11. Tzu-Shian Han & Su-fen Chiu, 2000. "Industrial Democracy and Institutional Environments: A Comparison of Germany and Taiwan," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(2), pages 147-182, May.
    12. van den Berg, Annette & Grift, Yolanda K. & Sapulete, Saraï & Brehmer, Wolfram & Behrens, Martin & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2019. "Work councils in Germany and the Netherlands compared: An explorative study using an input-throughput-output approach," WSI Studies 17, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    13. Christian Pfeifer, 2023. "Can worker codetermination stabilize democracies? Works councils and satisfaction with democracy in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 420, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    14. Freeman, Richard B., 1998. "War of the models: Which labour market institutions for the 21st century?1," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Mohrenweiser, Jens, 2022. "Works Councils," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1103, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Ida Regalia, 1997. "Managerial strategies and trade unions in the company environment," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 3(3), pages 551-577, November.
    17. Noda, Tomohiko, 2020. "Employee trust in management and mutual gains hypothesis in Japanese firms," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Deakin, S. & Koukiadaki, A., 2011. "Capability Theory, Employee Voice and Corporate Restructuring: Evidence from UK Case Studies," Working Papers wp429, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Sofie Balcaen & Sophie Manigart & Hubert Ooghe, 2011. "From distress to exit: determinants of the time to exit," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 407-446, August.
    20. Uwe JIRJAHN & Stephen C. SMITH, 2018. "Nonunion Employee Representation: Theory And The German Experience With Mandated Works Councils," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 201-233, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:215914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.