IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v21y2017i07ns1363919617500530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification And Generation Of Innovative Ideas In The Procurement Of The Automotive Industry: The Case Of Audi Ag

Author

Listed:
  • FELIX HOMFELDT

    (Chair of Innovation and Dialogue Marketing, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany†AUDI AG, Procurement Strategy, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany)

  • ALEXANDRA RESE

    (Chair of Innovation and Dialogue Marketing, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

  • HANNO BRENNER

    (#x2020;AUDI AG, Procurement Strategy, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany)

  • DANIEL BAIER

    (Chair of Innovation and Dialogue Marketing, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

  • TIL FABIO SCHÄFER

    (#x2020;AUDI AG, Procurement Strategy, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany)

Abstract

Open innovation and the use of suppliers and start-ups as external idea sources have become increasingly important in the automotive industry. Since the purchasing function in a company has correspondingly become more strategic, scholars have taken the role of procurement in innovation more intensely into account. This study examines procurement’s role in the innovation process of the automotive industry and investigates which and how open innovation instruments are used in order to benefit from the innovation capability of suppliers and start-ups. The empirical evidence is based on an in-depth case study of the automotive manufacturer AUDI AG. Several arguments are elaborated which justify a key role for procurement in the innovation process (e.g., interface role, economic activities). Furthermore, we identified nine pull and push instruments enabling procurement to contribute to Audi’s innovation performance. Since the instruments are designed to meet different internal requirements (e.g., in relation to a vehicle project or not), interesting insights for scholars and practitioners are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Homfeldt & Alexandra Rese & Hanno Brenner & Daniel Baier & Til Fabio Schäfer, 2017. "Identification And Generation Of Innovative Ideas In The Procurement Of The Automotive Industry: The Case Of Audi Ag," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-31, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:21:y:2017:i:07:n:s1363919617500530
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919617500530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919617500530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919617500530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schoenherr, Tobias & Wagner, Stephan M., 2016. "Supplier involvement in the fuzzy front end of new product development: An investigation of homophily, benevolence and market turbulence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 101-113.
    2. Eric von Hippel, 1986. "Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 791-805, July.
    3. Lutz Preuss, 2007. "Contribution Of Purchasing And Supply Management To Ecological Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 515-537.
    4. Tina B. Aune & Espen Gressetvold, 2011. "Supplier Involvement In Innovation Processes: A Taxonomy," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 121-143.
    5. Bart Kamp & Keith Bevis, 2012. "Knowledge transfer initiatives as a doorstep formula to open innovation," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 22-54.
    6. Marc Graner & Magdalena Mißler-Behr, 2012. "The use of methods in new product development - a review of empirical literature," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 158-184.
    7. Eric von Hippel & Ralph Katz, 2002. "Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 821-833, July.
    8. Alexander Brem & Joe Tidd (ed.), 2012. "Perspectives on Supplier Innovation:Theories, Concepts and Empirical Insights on Open Innovation and the Integration of Suppliers," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p852, October.
    9. Marc Graner & Magdalena Mißler-Behr, 2014. "Method Application In New Product Development And The Impact On Cross-Functional Collaboration And New Product Success," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-25.
    10. Von Hippel, Eric A. & Katz, Ralph, 2002. "Shifting Innovation to Users Via Toolkits," Working papers 4232-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    11. Sabine Brunswicker & Ulrich Hutschek, 2010. "Crossing Horizons: Leveraging Cross-Industry Innovation Search In The Front-End Of The Innovation Process," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 683-702.
    12. Akira Takeishi, 2002. "Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 321-338, June.
    13. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    14. Luciano Ciravegna & Giuliano Maielli, 2011. "Outsourcing Of New Product Development And The Opening Of Innovation In Mature Industries: A Longitudinal Study Of Fiat During Crisis And Recovery," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 69-93.
    15. David Rönnberg Sjödin & P. E. Eriksson, 2010. "Procurement Procedures For Supplier Integration And Open Innovation In Mature Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 655-682.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    2. Janina Milena Goldberg & Holger Schiele, 2019. "Innovating With Dominant Suppliers: Lessons From The Race For Laser Light," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Homfeldt, Felix & Rese, Alexandra & Simon, Franz, 2019. "Suppliers versus start-ups: Where do better innovation ideas come from?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1738-1757.
    4. Laurence Viale & Salomée Ruel & Dorsaf Zouari, 2022. "A mixed-methods approach to identifying buyers’ competencies for enabling innovation," Post-Print hal-03695531, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nisar, Arsalan & Palacios, Miguel & Grijalvo, Mercedes, 2016. "Open organizational structures: A new framework for the energy industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5175-5179.
    2. Habicht, Hagen & Oliveira, Pedro & Shcherbatiuk, Viktoriia, 2012. "User Innovators: When Patients Set Out to Help Themselves and End Up Helping Many," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(3), pages 277-295.
    3. Fuller, Johann & Jawecki, Gregor & Muhlbacher, Hans, 2007. "Innovation creation by online basketball communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 60-71, January.
    4. Claussen, Jörg & Halbinger, Maria A., 2021. "The role of pre-innovation platform activity for diffusion success: Evidence from consumer innovations on a 3D printing platform," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    5. Hung, Chia-Liang & Chou, Jerome Chih-Lung & Dong, Tse-Ping, 2011. "Innovations and communication through innovative users: An exploratory mechanism of social networking website," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 317-326.
    6. Rivieccio, Giorgia & Raïes, Karine & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "Are you attractive enough? An empirical analysis on user innovators' characteristics and the creation of new social ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Lars BENGTSSON & Natalia RYZHKOVA, 2013. "Managing Online Users in Open Innovation: The Case of a Nordic Telecom Company," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(89), pages 37-53, 1st quart.
    8. Ghasemzadeh, Khatereh & Bortoluzzi, Guido & Yordanova, Zornitsa, 2022. "Collaborating with users to innovate: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Flowers, Stephen, 2008. "Harnessing the hackers: The emergence and exploitation of Outlaw Innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-193, March.
    10. Svensson, Peter O. & Hartmann, Rasmus Koss, 2018. "Policies to promote user innovation: Makerspaces and clinician innovation in Swedish hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 277-288.
    11. Parmentier, Guy & Mangematin, Vincent, 2014. "Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 40-53.
    12. Maria Roszkowska-Menkes, 2017. "User Innovation: State of the Art and Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 127-154.
    13. Onexy Quintana-Martinez & Antonio-Rafael Ramos-Rodriguez, 2016. "Changes in the Axes of Convergence of Innovation Management Research," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 1-96, April.
    14. Isabel Schmid & Janik Wörner & Susanne Leist, 2022. "Automated identification of different lead users regarding the innovation process," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 945-970, June.
    15. V. Kumar & Nandini Nim & Amalesh Sharma, 2019. "Driving growth of Mwallets in emerging markets: a retailer’s perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 747-769, July.
    16. Philipp Alexander Ebel & Ulrich Bretschneider & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2016. "Can The Crowd Do The Job? Exploring The Effects Of Integrating Customers Into A Company’S Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Morgane Benade & Juliette Brun & Ingi Brown & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Frank Piller, 2016. "How Smart Products with Built in Flexibility Empower Users to Self -Design Their Uses? A Theoretical Framework for Use Generation," Post-Print hal-01425828, HAL.
    18. Niladri B. Syam & Amit Pazgal, 2013. "Co-Creation with Production Externalities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 805-820, September.
    19. Monika C. Schuhmacher & Sabine Kuester & Anna-Lena Hanker, 2018. "Investigating Antecedents And Stage-Specific Effects Of Customer Integration Intensity On New Product Success," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-36, May.
    20. Eymann, Torsten (Ed.), 2011. "Tagungsband zum Doctoral Consortium der WI 2011 [Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the Wirtschaftsinformatik 2011]," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 51, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:21:y:2017:i:07:n:s1363919617500530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.