IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v53y2006i1p45-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A branch‐and‐cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Moccia
  • Jean‐François Cordeau
  • Manlio Gaudioso
  • Gilbert Laporte

Abstract

The quay crane scheduling problem consists of determining a sequence of unloading and loading movements for cranes assigned to a vessel in order to minimize the vessel completion time as well as the crane idle times. Idle times originate from interferences between cranes since these roll on the same rails and a minimum safety distance must be maintained between them. The productivity of container terminals is often measured in terms of the time necessary to load and unload vessels by quay cranes, which are the most important and expensive equipment used in ports. We formulate the quay crane scheduling problem as a vehicle routing problem with side constraints, including precedence relationships between vertices. For small size instances our formulation can be solved by CPLEX. For larger ones we have developed a branch‐and‐cut algorithm incorporating several families of valid inequalities, which exploit the precedence constraints between vertices. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Moccia & Jean‐François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "A branch‐and‐cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 45-59, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:1:p:45-59
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Lim & Brian Rodrigues & Fei Xiao & Yi Zhu, 2004. "Crane scheduling with spatial constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 386-406, April.
    2. Carlos F. Daganzo, 1990. "The Productivity of Multipurpose Seaport Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 205-216, August.
    3. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    4. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Marielle Christiansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & David Ronen, 2004. "Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Gilbert Laporte & Jorge Riera-Ledesma & Juan-José Salazar-González, 2003. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Undirected Traveling Purchaser Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 940-951, December.
    7. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Defeng Sun & Lixin Tang & Roberto Baldacci & Zihan Chen, 2024. "A Decomposition Method for the Group-Based Quay Crane Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 543-570, March.
    2. Nils Boysen & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2011. "Scheduling Freight Trains in Rail-Rail Transshipment Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 199-211, May.
    3. Yongpei Guan & Kang-Hung Yang & Zhili Zhou, 2013. "The crane scheduling problem: models and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 119-139, March.
    4. Frank Meisel, 2011. "The quay crane scheduling problem with time windows," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(7), pages 619-636, October.
    5. Wang, Chong & Liu, Kaiyuan & Zhang, Canrong & Miao, Lixin, 2024. "Distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Kizilay, Damla & Hentenryck, Pascal Van & Eliiyi, Deniz T., 2020. "Constraint programming models for integrated container terminal operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 945-962.
    7. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    8. Abdellah Salhi & Ghazwan Alsoufi & Xinan Yang, 2019. "An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 69-98, January.
    9. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    10. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    11. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    12. Zhixing Luo & Hu Qin & Wenbin Zhu & Andrew Lim, 2016. "Branch‐and‐price‐and‐cut for the manpower routing problem with synchronization constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(2), pages 138-171, March.
    13. Shucheng Yu & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling problem with considering tidal impact and fuel consumption," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 345-368, December.
    14. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    15. Jayanth Krishna Mogali & Joris Kinable & Stephen F. Smith & Zachary B. Rubinstein, 2021. "Scheduling for multi-robot routing with blocking and enabling constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 291-318, June.
    16. Bektaş, Tolga & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Psaraftis, Harilaos N. & Puchinger, Jakob, 2019. "The role of operational research in green freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 807-823.
    17. Guvenc Dik & Erhan Kozan, 2017. "A flexible crane scheduling methodology for container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 64-96, March.
    18. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    19. Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang & Kai Wang, 2016. "Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 529-548, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branislav Dragović & Nam Kyu Park & Zoran Radmilović, 2006. "Ship-berth link performance evaluation: simulation and analytical approaches," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 281-299, July.
    2. Evrim Ursavas, 2017. "Crane allocation with stability considerations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 379-401, June.
    3. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    4. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte & Pasquale Legato & Luigi Moccia, 2005. "Models and Tabu Search Heuristics for the Berth-Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 526-538, November.
    5. Dirk Briskorn & Florian Jaehn & Andreas Wiehl, 2019. "A generator for test instances of scheduling problems concerning cranes in transshipment terminals," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 45-69, March.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    7. Cordeau, Jean-Francois & Gaudioso, Manlio & Laporte, Gilbert & Moccia, Luigi, 2007. "The service allocation problem at the Gioia Tauro Maritime Terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1167-1184, January.
    8. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    9. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    10. Lu Zhen & Shucheng Yu & Shuaian Wang & Zhuo Sun, 2019. "Scheduling quay cranes and yard trucks for unloading operations in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 455-478, February.
    11. Briskorn, Dirk & Drexl, Andreas & Hartmann, Sönke, 2005. "Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 596, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Maloni, Michael J. & Jackson, Eric C., 2007. "Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    13. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    14. Chen, Lu & Bostel, Nathalie & Dejax, Pierre & Cai, Jianguo & Xi, Lifeng, 2007. "A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 40-58, August.
    15. Ilaria Vacca & Matteo Salani & Michel Bierlaire, 2013. "An Exact Algorithm for the Integrated Planning of Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 148-161, May.
    16. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    17. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    18. Shawn Choo & Diego Klabjan & David Simchi-Levi, 2010. "Multiship Crane Sequencing with Yard Congestion Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 98-115, February.
    19. Chen, Lu & Langevin, André & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Integrated scheduling of crane handling and truck transportation in a maritime container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 142-152.
    20. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:1:p:45-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.