IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v272y2019i1d10.1007_s10479-017-2539-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports

Author

Listed:
  • Abdellah Salhi

    (University of Essex)

  • Ghazwan Alsoufi

    (University of Essex
    University of Mosul)

  • Xinan Yang

    (University of Essex)

Abstract

This paper puts forward an integrated optimisation model that combines three distinct problems, namely berth allocation, quay crane assignment, and quay crane scheduling that arise in container ports. Each one of these problems is difficult to solve in its own right. However, solving them individually leads almost surely to sub-optimal solutions. Hence, it is desirable to solve them in a combined form. The model is of the mixed-integer programming type with the objective being to minimize the tardiness of vessels and reduce the cost of berthing. Experimental results show that relatively small instances of the proposed model can be solved exactly using CPLEX. Large scale instances, however, can only be solved in reasonable times using heuristics. Here, an implementation of the genetic algorithm is considered. The effectiveness of this implementation is tested against CPLEX on small to medium size instances of the combined model. Larger size instances were also solved with the genetic algorithm, showing that this approach is capable of finding the optimal or near optimal solutions in realistic times.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdellah Salhi & Ghazwan Alsoufi & Xinan Yang, 2019. "An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 69-98, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:272:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2539-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2539-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2539-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-017-2539-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    2. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    3. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    4. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    5. Jiyin Liu & Yat‐wah Wan & Lei Wang, 2006. "Quay crane scheduling at container terminals to minimize the maximum relative tardiness of vessel departures," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 60-74, February.
    6. Ya Xu & Qiushuang Chen & Xiongwen Quan, 2012. "Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 123-140, January.
    7. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    8. Imai, Akio & Sun, Xin & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2005. "Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 199-221, March.
    9. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    10. J. A. Vázquez Rodríguez & A. Salhi, 2006. "A Synergy Exploiting Evolutionary Approach To Complex Scheduling Problems," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: I D L Bogle & J Žilinskas (ed.), Computer Aided Methods In Optimal Design And Operations, chapter 7, pages 59-68, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Yongpei Guan & Kang-Hung Yang & Zhili Zhou, 2013. "The crane scheduling problem: models and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 119-139, March.
    12. Lee, Der-Horng & Wang, Hui Qiu & Miao, Lixin, 2008. "Quay crane scheduling with non-interference constraints in port container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 124-135, January.
    13. Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2013. "Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 108-122.
    14. Lee, Der-Horng & Chen, Jiang Hang & Cao, Jin Xin, 2010. "The continuous Berth Allocation Problem: A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Solution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1017-1029, November.
    15. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1989. "The crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 159-175, June.
    16. Türkoğulları, Yavuz B. & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2016. "Optimal berth allocation, time-variant quay crane assignment and scheduling with crane setups in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 985-1001.
    17. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    18. Meisel, Frank & Bierwirth, Christian, 2009. "Heuristics for the integration of crane productivity in the berth allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 196-209, January.
    19. Luigi Moccia & Jean‐François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "A branch‐and‐cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 45-59, February.
    20. Lee, Yusin & Chen, Chuen-Yih, 2009. "An optimization heuristic for the berth scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 500-508, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    2. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    3. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    4. Sung Won Cho & Hyun Ji Park & Chulung Lee, 2021. "An integrated method for berth allocation and quay crane assignment to allow for reassignment of vessels to other terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 123-153, March.
    5. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    6. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    7. H. L. Ma & S. H. Chung & H. K. Chan & Li Cui, 2019. "An integrated model for berth and yard planning in container terminals with multi-continuous berth layout," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 409-431, February.
    8. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    9. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Xu, Dongsheng & Li, Chung-Lun & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2012. "Berth allocation with time-dependent physical limitations on vessels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 47-56.
    11. Shangyao Yan & Chung-Cheng Lu & Jun-Hsiao Hsieh & Han-Chun Lin, 2019. "A Dynamic and Flexible Berth Allocation Model with Stochastic Vessel Arrival Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 903-927, September.
    12. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    13. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    14. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    15. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    16. Wang, Chong & Liu, Kaiyuan & Zhang, Canrong & Miao, Lixin, 2024. "Distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    18. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    19. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    20. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with vessel stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 271-283.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:272:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2539-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.