IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v58y2011i7p619-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quay crane scheduling problem with time windows

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Meisel

Abstract

The quay crane scheduling problem consists of scheduling tasks for loading and unloading containers on cranes that are assigned to a vessel for its service. This article introduces a new approach for quay crane scheduling, where the availability of cranes at a vessel is restricted to certain time windows. The problem is of practical relevance, because container terminal operators frequently redeploy cranes among vessels to speed up the service of high‐priority vessels while serving low‐priority vessels casually. This article provides a mathematical formulation of the problem and a tree‐search‐based heuristic solution method. A computational investigation on a large set of test instances is used to evaluate the performance of the heuristic and to identify the impact of differently structured crane time windows on the achievable vessel handling time. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Meisel, 2011. "The quay crane scheduling problem with time windows," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(7), pages 619-636, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:58:y:2011:i:7:p:619-636
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiyin Liu & Yat‐wah Wan & Lei Wang, 2006. "Quay crane scheduling at container terminals to minimize the maximum relative tardiness of vessel departures," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 60-74, February.
    2. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    3. Luigi Moccia & Jean‐François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "A branch‐and‐cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 45-59, February.
    4. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    5. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1989. "The crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 159-175, June.
    6. Lee, Der-Horng & Wang, Hui Qiu & Miao, Lixin, 2008. "Quay crane scheduling with non-interference constraints in port container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 124-135, January.
    7. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    2. Güneş Erdoğan & Maria Battarra & Gilbert Laporte, 2014. "Scheduling twin robots on a line," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 119-130, March.
    3. Simon Emde, 2017. "Optimally scheduling interfering and non‐interfering cranes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(6), pages 476-489, September.
    4. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    5. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    6. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    7. Nabil Nehme & Bacel Maddah & Isam A. Kaysi, 2021. "An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut Port container terminal," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    8. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    9. Feifeng Zheng & Yaxin Pang & Ming Liu & Yinfeng Xu, 2020. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the general quay crane double-cycling problem with internal-reshuffles," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 708-724, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shucheng Yu & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling problem with considering tidal impact and fuel consumption," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 345-368, December.
    2. Abdellah Salhi & Ghazwan Alsoufi & Xinan Yang, 2019. "An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 69-98, January.
    3. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    4. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    5. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    6. Evrim Ursavas, 2017. "Crane allocation with stability considerations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 379-401, June.
    7. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    8. Nabil Nehme & Bacel Maddah & Isam A. Kaysi, 2021. "An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut Port container terminal," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    9. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    10. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with vessel stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 271-283.
    11. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    12. Yongpei Guan & Kang-Hung Yang & Zhili Zhou, 2013. "The crane scheduling problem: models and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 119-139, March.
    13. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    14. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    15. Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2013. "Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 108-122.
    16. Lu Zhen & Shucheng Yu & Shuaian Wang & Zhuo Sun, 2019. "Scheduling quay cranes and yard trucks for unloading operations in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 455-478, February.
    17. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    18. Hongming Li & Xintao Li, 2022. "A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Bi-Objective Quay Crane Scheduling Problem Based on Efficiency and Energy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Canrong Zhang & Tao Wu & Mingyao Qi & Lixin Miao, 2018. "Simultaneous Allocation of Berths and Quay Cranes under Discrete Berth Situation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(03), pages 1-28, June.
    20. Defeng Sun & Lixin Tang & Roberto Baldacci & Zihan Chen, 2024. "A Decomposition Method for the Group-Based Quay Crane Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 543-570, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:58:y:2011:i:7:p:619-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.