IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1640-e1650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Anette Johnsson
  • Åse Boman
  • Petra Wagman
  • Sandra Pennbrant

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe how nurses communicate with older patients and their relatives in a department of medicine for older people in western Sweden. Background Communication is an essential tool for nurses when working with older patients and their relatives, but often patients and relatives experience shortcomings in the communication exchanges. They may not receive information or are not treated in a professional way. Good communication can facilitate the development of a positive meeting and improve the patient's health outcome. Design An ethnographic design informed by the sociocultural perspective was applied. Methods Forty participatory observations were conducted and analysed during the period October 2015–September 2016. The observations covered 135 hours of nurse–patient–relative interaction. Field notes were taken, and 40 informal field conversations with nurses and 40 with patients and relatives were carried out. Semistructured follow‐up interviews were conducted with five nurses. Results In the result, it was found that nurses communicate with four different voices: a medical voice described as being incomplete, task‐oriented and with a disease perspective; a nursing voice described as being confirmatory, process‐oriented and with a holistic perspective; a pedagogical voice described as being contextualised, comprehension‐oriented and with a learning perspective; and a power voice described as being distancing and excluding. The voices can be seen as context‐dependent communication approaches. When nurses switch between the voices, this indicates a shift in the orientation or situation. Conclusion The results indicate that if nurses successfully combine the voices, while limiting the use of the power voice, the communication exchanges can become a more positive experience for all parties involved and a good nurse–patient–relative communication exchange can be achieved. Relevance to clinical practice Working for improved communication between nurses, patients and relatives is crucial for establishing a positive nurse–patient–relative relationship, which is a basis for improving patient care and healthcare outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Anette Johnsson & Åse Boman & Petra Wagman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1640-1650, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1640-e1650
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose M Olsen & Bjørg H Østnor & Ingela Enmarker & Ove Hellzén, 2013. "Barriers to information exchange during older patients' transfer: nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2964-2973, October.
    2. Engle A Chan & Aled Jones & Sylvia Fung & Sui Chu Wu, 2012. "Nurses’ perception of time availability in patient communication in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1168-1177, April.
    3. Louise Bélanger & Anne Bourbonnais & Roxanne Bernier & Monique Benoit, 2017. "Communication between nurses and family caregivers of hospitalised older persons: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 609-619, March.
    4. Anna Nygren Zotterman & Lisa Skär & Malin Olsson & Siv Söderberg, 2016. "Being in togetherness: meanings of encounters within primary healtcare setting for patients living with long‐term illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2854-2862, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anette Johnsson & Petra Wagman & Åse Boman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "What are they talking about? Content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1651-1659, April.
    2. Patricia M. Davidson & Martha Allison Abshire & Glenn Paull & Sarah L. Szanton, 2018. "Family caregivers: Important but often poorly understood," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4242-4244, December.
    3. Gabriella Facchinetti & Andrea Ianni & Michela Piredda & Anna Marchetti & Daniela D’Angelo & Ivziku Dhurata & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Discharge of older patients with chronic diseases: What nurses do and what they record. An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1719-1727, May.
    4. Flaminia Reale & Federica Segato & Daniela Tartaglini & Cristina Masella, 2020. "Action Research as a Method to Find Solutions for the Burden of Caregiving at Hospital Discharge," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 167-185, April.
    5. María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert & Vicente Javier Prado‐Gascó, 2018. "The role of empathy and emotional intelligence in nurses’ communication attitudes using regression models and fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis models," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2661-2672, July.
    6. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.
    7. Helena Lööf & Unn‐Britt Johansson, 2019. "“A body in transformation”—An empirical phenomenological study about fear‐avoidance beliefs towards physical activity among persons experiencing moderate‐to‐severe rheumatic pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 321-329, January.
    8. Faramarz Pourasghar & Nesa Kavakebi & Jafar Tabrizi & Ahad Mohammadi, 2016. "Barriers to Communication and Information Exchange in Patient Transfer and Its Consequences," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(12), pages 178-178, December.
    9. Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Rebecca Feo & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen, 2018. "Students’ perspectives on basic nursing care education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2450-2459, June.
    10. Liselott Årestedt & Carina Persson & Margareta Rämgård & Eva Benzein, 2018. "Experiences of encounters with healthcare professionals through the lenses of families living with chronic illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 836-847, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1640-e1650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.