IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i7-8p1168-1177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perception of time availability in patient communication in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Engle A Chan
  • Aled Jones
  • Sylvia Fung
  • Sui Chu Wu

Abstract

Aims. To explore nurses’ perceptions of their patient communication in practice and to identify their ways of communicating. Background. Nurse theorists and clinicians are aware of the importance of nurse–patient communication in providing patient‐centred care. However, barriers remain that prevent nurses from implementing quality/effective communication, and time is often viewed as a critical variable. Continuous emphasis on efficiency contravenes patient‐centred care, warranting a re‐examination of nurses’ perception of time in nurse–patient communication. Design. Focus group interviews were adopted. Thirty‐nine registered nurses participated. Interviews were tape‐recorded, transcribed and translated, and data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify codes, categories and themes/patterns. Results. Three themes were identified regarding nurses’ perception of communication with time: (1) Patterns of communication. (2) Routine scheduled communication vs. meeting individuals’ needs. (3) Saving time through communication. Patterns of communication, based on participants’ criteria such as the purpose, who initiated it, the nature of communication, expectation to perform, therapeutic value and relation with time were explicated. By integrating communication into routines as intended actions, nurses demonstrate that communication and relationship building with patients take no extra time. Good communication and good relationships help nurses save time. Conclusions. Nurses’ communication behaviour is closely related to their perception of communication. This study suggests the need for a paradigm shift in thinking about communication as requiring time. Additionally, nurses should recognise the value of short, iterative interaction and chit‐chat as quality communication for knowing their patients and providing patient‐centred care. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses should think beyond time in the discourse of effective nurse–patient communication, as it often relates to manpower. An understanding of how nurses perceive their time availability for nurse–patient communication and their use of time for this aspect contribute to the discourse regarding how to improve patient‐centred care.

Suggested Citation

  • Engle A Chan & Aled Jones & Sylvia Fung & Sui Chu Wu, 2012. "Nurses’ perception of time availability in patient communication in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1168-1177, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1168-1177
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03841.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03841.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03841.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anette Johnsson & Åse Boman & Petra Wagman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1640-1650, April.
    2. María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert & Vicente Javier Prado‐Gascó, 2018. "The role of empathy and emotional intelligence in nurses’ communication attitudes using regression models and fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis models," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2661-2672, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1168-1177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.