IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v8y2016i12p178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Communication and Information Exchange in Patient Transfer and Its Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Faramarz Pourasghar
  • Nesa Kavakebi
  • Jafar Tabrizi
  • Ahad Mohammadi

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES- The patient transfer is multidisciplinary process and communication and information exchange are crucial for its successful accomplishment. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers that negatively influence communication and information exchange during the patient transfer between hospitals and the Center for Treatment Guidance and Information (CTGI) and to describe their consequences.METHODS- A qualitative study based on Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Three FGDs were carried out with 5 experts with years of experience working in the CTGI and 25 interviews with individuals involved in patient transfer process. Data were analyzed using content analysis method.FINDINGS- Three major themes including poor communication and information exchange at the CTGI, referring hospital, and receiving hospital were identified. The most important sub-themes at the level of CTGI were- the unavailability of accurate patient medical history and lack of confidence and different working process for patient admission in hospitals. At the level of referring hospital they were incomplete medical history, medical documents, vague patient transfer indications and lack of effective communication. At the level of receiving hospital they were lack of providing feedback, lack of mutual communication and incorrect report of available beds. Also four major consequences of poor communication and information exchange were identified which are managerial, clinical, economic and social consequences.CONCLUSIONS- To overcome the barriers, there is a need for proper monitoring by accountable organizations, reviewing the protocols for patient transfer, an increase in inter-sector collaboration and improvement in communications infrastructure and collection of data.

Suggested Citation

  • Faramarz Pourasghar & Nesa Kavakebi & Jafar Tabrizi & Ahad Mohammadi, 2016. "Barriers to Communication and Information Exchange in Patient Transfer and Its Consequences," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(12), pages 178-178, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/57225/31906
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/57225
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose M Olsen & Bjørg H Østnor & Ingela Enmarker & Ove Hellzén, 2013. "Barriers to information exchange during older patients' transfer: nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2964-2973, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anette Johnsson & Petra Wagman & Åse Boman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "What are they talking about? Content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1651-1659, April.
    2. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.
    3. Anette Johnsson & Åse Boman & Petra Wagman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1640-1650, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.