IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2450-2459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ perspectives on basic nursing care education

Author

Listed:
  • Getty Huisman‐de Waal
  • Rebecca Feo
  • Hester Vermeulen
  • Maud Heinen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the perspectives of nursing students on their education concerning basic nursing care, learned either during theoretical education or clinical placement, with a specific focus on nutrition and communication. Background Basic care activities lie at the core of nursing, but are ill‐informed by evidence and often poorly delivered. Nursing students’ education on basic care might be lacking, and the question remains how they learn to deliver basic care in clinical practice. Design Descriptive study, using an online questionnaire. Methods Nursing students at the vocational and bachelor level of six nursing schools in the Netherlands were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their perception of basic nursing care education in general (both theoretical education and clinical placement) and specifically in relation to nutrition and communication. Results Nursing students (n = 226 bachelor students, n = 30 vocational students) completed the questionnaire. Most students reported that they learned more about basic nursing care during clinical placement than during theoretical education. Vocational students also reported learning more about basic nursing care in both theoretical education and clinical practice than bachelor students. In terms of nutrition, low numbers of students from both education levels reported learning about nutrition protocols and guidelines during theoretical education. In terms of communication, vocational students indicated that they learned more about different aspects of communication during clinical practice than theoretical education and were also more likely to learn about communication (in both theoretical education and clinical practice) than were bachelor students. Conclusion Basic nursing care seems to be largely invisible in nursing education, especially at the bachelor level and during theoretical education. Relevance to clinical practice Improved basic nursing care will enhance nurse‐sensitive outcomes and patient satisfaction and will contribute to lower healthcare costs. This study shows that there is scope within current nurse education in the Netherlands to focus more systematically and explicitly on basic nursing care.

Suggested Citation

  • Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Rebecca Feo & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen, 2018. "Students’ perspectives on basic nursing care education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2450-2459, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2450-2459
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Burston & Wendy Chaboyer & Brigid Gillespie, 2014. "Nurse‐sensitive indicators suitable to reflect nursing care quality: a review and discussion of issues," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1785-1795, July.
    2. Louise Bélanger & Anne Bourbonnais & Roxanne Bernier & Monique Benoit, 2017. "Communication between nurses and family caregivers of hospitalised older persons: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 609-619, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia M. Davidson & Martha Allison Abshire & Glenn Paull & Sarah L. Szanton, 2018. "Family caregivers: Important but often poorly understood," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4242-4244, December.
    2. Gabriella Facchinetti & Andrea Ianni & Michela Piredda & Anna Marchetti & Daniela D’Angelo & Ivziku Dhurata & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Discharge of older patients with chronic diseases: What nurses do and what they record. An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1719-1727, May.
    3. Flaminia Reale & Federica Segato & Daniela Tartaglini & Cristina Masella, 2020. "Action Research as a Method to Find Solutions for the Burden of Caregiving at Hospital Discharge," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 167-185, April.
    4. Anette Johnsson & Åse Boman & Petra Wagman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1640-1650, April.
    5. Ju‐Lin Gao & Xiao‐Min Liu & Wen‐Fang Che & Xia Xin, 2018. "Construction of nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis using Delphi method," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3920-3930, November.
    6. Kieft, R.A.M.M. & Stalpers, D. & Jansen, A.P.M. & Francke, A.L. & Delnoij, D.M.J., 2018. "The methodological quality of nurse-sensitive indicators in Dutch hospitals: A descriptive exploratory research study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 755-764.
    7. Lin Chen & Li‐Hua Huang & Mei‐Yuan Xing & Zhi‐Xian Feng & Le‐Wen Shao & Mei‐Yun Zhang & Rong‐Ya Shao, 2017. "Using the Delphi method to develop nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for the NICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 502-513, February.
    8. Scott Domingue & Skip Morelock & Judith Walsh & Patricia Newcomb & Christine Russe & Alexander Nava & Ashley Jones & Jessy R. John, 2018. "Beyond fall risk assessment: A case–control study in an Urban Medical Center," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3894-3899, November.
    9. Laurie Grealish & Wendy Chaboyer & Jacob Darch & Belinda Real & Maggie Phelan & Dawn Soltau & Matthew Lunn & Susan Brandis & Jo‐anne Todd & Marie Cooke, 2019. "Caring for the older person with cognitive impairment in hospital: Qualitative analysis of nursing personnel reflections on fall events," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1346-1353, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2450-2459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.