IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i4p3148-3163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing CSR communication strategies to increase sustainable behaviors from the perspective of spiritual capital

Author

Listed:
  • Ya‐Ching Lee

Abstract

Many companies pursue sustainability and rely on communication to convince consumers of their sustainability efforts. This study examines the impact of corporate sustainable communication strategies from the perspective of spiritual capital. Results indicate that communication framed in strength, personal well‐being, and mobilizability positively affects consumers' trust and sustainable behavior intentions through perceived spirituality. This study also clarifies gender differences. It offers a simple yet rigorous theoretical framework to evaluate sustainable communication strategies. The conceptualization and development of these measures is an important step for future studies that evaluate sustainable communication effects. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to explore the dimensions of perceived spirituality and evaluate their roles in sustainable communication. It finally offers practical suggestions for business sustainable communication strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ya‐Ching Lee, 2024. "Developing CSR communication strategies to increase sustainable behaviors from the perspective of spiritual capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3148-3163, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:3148-3163
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2718
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Vitell & Megan Keith & Manisha Mathur, 2011. "Antecedents to the Justification of Norm Violating Behavior Among Business Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 163-173, June.
    2. Qamar Farooq & Yunhong Hao & Xuan Liu, 2019. "Understanding corporate social responsibility with cross‐cultural differences: A deeper look at religiosity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 965-971, July.
    3. Ananda Khanal & Muhammad Akhtaruzzaman & Indrapriya Kularatne, 2021. "The influence of social media on stakeholder engagement and the corporate social responsibility of small businesses," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1921-1929, November.
    4. Juran Kim & Charles R. Taylor & Kyung Hoon Kim & Ki Hoon Lee, 2015. "Measures of perceived sustainability," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 182-193, March.
    5. Räty, R. & Carlsson-Kanyama, A., 2010. "Energy consumption by gender in some European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 646-649, January.
    6. Shubham Kumar & Tapas Kumar Giri, 2020. "Interconnectedness between spirituality and sustainable development goals: evidence from an Indian perspective," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1), pages 133-149.
    7. Brandi S. Morris & Polymeros Chrysochou & Simon T. Karg & Panagiotis Mitkidis, 2020. "Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Ya‐Ching Lee, 2017. "Corporate Sustainable Development and Marketing Communications on Social Media: Fortune 500 Enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 569-583, July.
    9. Won‐Moo Hur & Hanna Kim & Joon Hyo Jang, 2016. "The Role of Gender Differences in the Impact of CSR Perceptions on Corporate Marketing Outcomes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 345-357, November.
    10. Ya‐Ching Lee, 2020. "Communicating sustainable development: Effects of stakeholder‐centric perceived sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1540-1551, July.
    11. Cassie Mogilner & Jennifer Aaker & Sepandar D. Kamvar, 2012. "How Happiness Affects Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 429-443.
    12. Thomas Dietz & Linda Kalof & Paul C. Stern, 2002. "Gender, Values, and Environmentalism," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 353-364, March.
    13. Linda O’Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass, 2014. "Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement: A New Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 121-145, November.
    14. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ya‐Ching Lee, 2020. "Communicating sustainable development: Effects of stakeholder‐centric perceived sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1540-1551, July.
    2. Tjørring, Lise & Jensen, Carsten Lynge & Hansen, Lars Gårn & Andersen, Laura Mørch, 2018. "Increasing the flexibility of electricity consumption in private households: Does gender matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 9-18.
    3. Enrico Fontana & Prapassorn Siriwichai, 2022. "Understanding transgender persons' careers to advance sustainable development: The case of Trans for Career Thailand," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1573-1590, December.
    4. Rice, Connor & Ragbir, Nadine K. & Rice, Stephen & Barcia, Gina, 2020. "Willingness to pay for sustainable aviation depends on ticket price, greenhouse gas reductions and gender," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Osorio, Pilar & Tobarra, María-Ángeles & Tomás, Manuel, 2024. "Are there gender differences in household carbon footprints? Evidence from Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    7. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    8. María Del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach, 2019. "Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross‐national analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 238-247, January.
    9. Enzo Loner, 2016. "A new way of looking at old things. An application of Guttman errors analysis to the study of environmental concern," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 823-847, March.
    10. Sologon, Denisa Maria & Doorley, Karina & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Peluso, Eugenio, 2024. "The Gendered Nature of the Cost-of-Living Crisis in Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 16820, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Witkowski, Terrence H. & Reddy, Sabine, 2010. "Antecedents of ethical consumption activities in Germany and the United States," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 8-14.
    12. Measham, Thomas G. & Zhang, Airong, 2019. "Social licence, gender and mining: Moral conviction and perceived economic importance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 363-368.
    13. Umaerus, Patrik & Högvall Nordin, Maria & Lidestav, Gun, 2019. "Do female forest owners think and act “greener”?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 52-58.
    14. Travis Tae Oh & Michel Tuan Pham, 2022. "A Liberating-Engagement Theory of Consumer Fun [Pleasure Principles: A Review of Research on Hedonic Consumption]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 46-73.
    15. Volkan Yeniaras & Tugra Nazli Akarsu, 2017. "Religiosity and Life Satisfaction: A Multi-dimensional Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1815-1840, December.
    16. Lu-Ming Tseng, 2019. "How Implicit Ethics Institutionalization Affects Ethical Selling Intention: The Case of Taiwan’s Life Insurance Salespeople," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 727-742, September.
    17. Morioka, Rika, 2014. "Gender difference in the health risk perception of radiation from Fukushima in Japan: The role of hegemonic masculinity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 105-112.
    18. Elnur Nabivi, 2020. "Implementation of Green Marketing Concept Through Social Media Activities: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(11), pages 55-67.
    19. Shiri Melumad & Rhonda Hadi & Christian Hildebrand & Adrian F. Ward, 2020. "Technology-Augmented Choice: How Digital Innovations Are Transforming Consumer Decision Processes," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(3), pages 90-101, October.
    20. Percy Marquina & Vincent Charles, 2021. "A Bayesian resampling approach to estimate the difference in effect sizes in consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1680-1699, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:3148-3163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.