IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v9y1993i6p605-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodity supply response to a producer-financed advertising program: The california avocado industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hoy F. Carman

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis)

  • Richard D. Green

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis)

Abstract

A simulation model of the California avocado industry is used to estimate the impact of a producerfunded generic advertising program on acreage and returns over time. Although returns from advertising can be quite favorable in the short-run, improved returns stimulate increased plantings and the resulting production will erode advertising returns over time. California avocado producers, after over 30 years of actively promoting their product, appear to have real returns per acre similar to those that would have occurred without advertising but advertising has become a built-in cost. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoy F. Carman & Richard D. Green, 1993. "Commodity supply response to a producer-financed advertising program: The california avocado industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(6), pages 605-621.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:9:y:1993:i:6:p:605-621
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(199311)9:6<605::AID-AGR2720090607>3.0.CO;2-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forker, Olan D. & Liu, Donald J., 1989. "Commodity Promotion: Who Benefits and By How Much?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.
    2. Marc Nerlove & Frederick V. Waugh, 1961. "Advertising without Supply Control: Some Implications of a Study of the Advertising of Oranges," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 43(4_Part_I), pages 813-837.
    3. Hurst, Susan J. & Forker, Olan D., 1991. "Annotated Bibliography of Generic Commodity Promotion Research (Revised)," Research Bulletins 123107, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Stanley R. Thompson & Doyle A. Eiler, 1975. "Producer Returns from Increased Milk Advertising," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(3), pages 505-508.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gary W. Williams, 1999. "Commodity checkoff programs as alternative producer investment opportunities: The case of soybeans," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 539-552.
    2. Williams, Gary W. & Capps Jr., Oral, 2020. "Generic promotion of Norwegian seafood exports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    3. Hanawa, Hikaru & Willett, Lois Schertz & Tomek, William G., 1997. "An Econometric Analysis of the U.S. Kiwifruit Industry: Annual and Monthly Factors," Research Bulletins 122721, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Hoy F. Carman, 2006. "Offsetting Price Impacts from Imports with Generic Advertising and Promotion Programs: The Hass Avocado Promotion and Research Order," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(4), pages 463-481.
    5. Fritz, Richard & Cornelius, James & Green, John R., 1994. "An Assessment Of Product Marketing Strategies Utilized By The Oregon Potato Commission," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279594, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    6. Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant & Jennifer S. James, 1999. "Doing well by doing a body good: An evaluation of the industry-funded nutrition education program conducted by the Dairy Council of California," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 371-392.
    7. Williams, Gary W. & Shumway, C. Richard & Love, H. Alan, 2002. "Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 97-111, April.
    8. Carman, Hoy F. & Li, Lan & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "An Economic Evaluation of the Hass Avocado Promotion Order’s First Five Years," Research Reports 121697, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Gary W. & Myers, Lester H., 1982. "The Economic Effectiveness Of Foreign Market Development Programs: The Case Of Soybeans And Soybean Products," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279211, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Blisard, Noel & Blayney, Donald P. & Chandran, Ram & Allshouse, Jane E., 1999. "Analyses of Generic Dairy Advertising, 1984-97," Technical Bulletins 33554, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kinnucan, Henry, 1984. "Evaluating Farm Commodity Promotional * * Programs," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279028, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Goddard, E.W. & Tielu, A., 1987. "The OMMB'S Fluid Milk Advertising," Working Papers 244815, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Chang, Hui-Shung (Christie) & Venkateswaran, Meenakshi, 1993. "Generic Advertising Wearout," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(03), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Sun, Theresa Y. & Blisard, Noel & Blaylock, James R., 1995. "An Evaluation of Fluid Milk and Cheese Advertising, 1978-93," Technical Bulletins 156767, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Blisard, Noel & Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David, 1996. "Fluid Milk and Cheese Advertising," Staff Reports 278800, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Abbott, Malcolm, 2016. "A long-term view of the effectiveness of wool promotion schemes," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 54(3), January.
    9. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1985. "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness Using Time Series Data," Research on Effectiveness of Agricultural Commodity Promotion, April 9-10, 1985, Arlington, Virginia 279492, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    10. Capps, Oral & Seo, Seong-Cheon & Nichols, John P., 1997. "On the Estimation of Advertising Effects for Branded Products: An Application to Spaghetti Sauces," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 291-302, December.
    11. Hayes, Dermot J. & Jensen, Helen H., 1992. "Generic Advertising Without Supply Control: Implications Of Mandatory Assessments," Commodity Promotion Policy in a Global Economy, October 22-23, 1992, Arlington, Virginia 279575, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    12. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Venkateswaran, Meenakshi, 1990. "Effects of Generic Advertising on Perceptions and Behavior: The Case of Catfish," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 137-151, December.
    13. Øystein Myrland & Diansheng Dong & Harry M. Kaiser, 2007. "Quantity versus quality effects of generic advertising: The case of Norwegian salmon," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 85-100.
    14. Schmit, Todd M. & Kaiser, Harry M., 2007. "Optimal Seasonal Allocation of Generic Dairy Advertising Expenditures," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Williams, Gary W. & Shumway, C. Richard & Love, H. Alan, 2002. "Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Tisdell, Clement A., 1976. "The Promotion Of Wool And Synthetic Fibre Blends: Some Alternative Strategies For The Wool Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(03), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Quilkey, John J., 1986. "Promotion Of Primary Products - A View From The Cloister," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 30(1), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Sellen, Daniel & Goddard, Ellen & Duff, Stephen, 1997. "Returns from Research and Advertising in the North American Hog and Pork Industry," Economic Analysis of Research and Promotion, March 21-22, 1997, New Orleans, Louisiana 279675, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    19. Sun, Theresa Y. & Blaylock, James R., 1993. "An Evaluation of Fluid Milk and Cheese Advertising," Technical Bulletins 157039, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1999. "Advertising Traded Goods," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:9:y:1993:i:6:p:605-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.