IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v4y2011i1p9-29n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results

Author

Listed:
  • Bouckaert Geert

    (Public Management Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium)

  • Nakrošis Vitalis

    (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, University of Vilnius, Lithunia)

  • Nemec Juraj

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Slovakia)

Abstract

The common feature of CEE systems is that they change drastically. Political systems change, e.g. from dictatorships to democracies, and their elites are removed. Democratic checks and balances are established. State structures are reshuffled, e.g. toward more decentralisation. The economic system changes its nature, e.g. from state monopolies to market systems with private firms. Societal and social systems with NGOs, not-for-profit organisations and citizen action groups are established and are designed for people to participate actively in the public debate and to become stakeholders of their society and their communities (Peters 1996).To achieve planned changes, CEE countries had to choose their strategies. In focusing on the administration and the management of public systems, five scopes of reform are possible, from very narrow and limited to a very widespread and broad span of reform (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Choosing one of these models has tremendous practical implications for the content of a reform programme, for the choice of the reform projects, for the sequence and timing of the reform portfolio. It also requires different tactical choices to be made. One of the issues is how many degrees of freedom there are to reform the public sector.Just as in many other countries, mixed strategies have been chosen for public- sector reform in CEE countries, and these choices have changed over time. However, it seems that the span of reform has rather been broad than narrow. It also seems that tactics could have been more visible than strategy because of electoral cycles.This brings us to the question of the trajectories to move ahead. Our article, heavily based in the joint NISPAcee research project4 tries to respond to some selected dimensions of the question of what the common and different trajectories and selected outcomes of public administration / management reforms are in the CEE region.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouckaert Geert & Nakrošis Vitalis & Nemec Juraj, 2011. "Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 9-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:4:y:2011:i:1:p:9-29:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schick, Allen, 1998. "Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's Reforms," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 13(1), pages 123-131, February.
    2. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khadzhyradieva Svitlana & Slukhai Sergii & Rachynskyi Anatolii, 2020. "Public Administration in Ukraine: Adjusting to European Standards," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 81-108, June.
    2. Svidroňová Mária Murray & Kaščáková Alena & Vrbičanová Veronika, 2018. "Can Social Media be a Tool for Participatory Governance in Slovak Municipalities ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 81-101, December.
    3. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    4. Veselý Arnošt, 2014. "The Profile and Work of Officials in Central and Regional Administration Compared: The Case of the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 107-128, June.
    5. Francesco Badia & Anna Maria Visser Travagli, 2012. "Nuove competenze manageriali per i musei italiani nello scenario delle riforme del settore pubblico e dell'universita'," Working Papers 201209, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.
    2. Andrews, Matt, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," Working Paper Series 15-063, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Matt Andrews, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," CID Working Papers 303, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. William Dunn & David Miller, 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 345-358, December.
    5. Andreas Kakouris & Elina Meliou, 2011. "New Public Management: Promote the Public Sector Modernization Through Service Quality. Current Experiences and Future Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 351-369, December.
    6. Lucica Matei & Spyridon Flogaitis (ed.), 2011. "PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BALKANS - from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Management," ASsee Online Series, South-Eastern European Administrative Studies – ASsee Online Series, volume 1, number 1, September.
    7. Waluyo, Budi, 2018. "Balancing financial autonomy and control in agencification: issues emerging from the Indonesian higher education (Otonomi dan pengendalian keuangan pada Badan Layanan Umum sektor pendidikan)," INA-Rxiv x2vm4, Center for Open Science.
    8. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    9. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Leonard, David K. & Bloom, Gerald & Hanson, Kara & O’Farrell, Juan & Spicer, Neil, 2013. "Institutional Solutions to the Asymmetric Information Problem in Health and Development Services for the Poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 71-87.
    12. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    13. Roy T. Meyers, 2017. "Is the U.S. Congress an Insurmountable Obstacle to Any “Far-Sighted Conception of Budgeting”?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 5-24, December.
    14. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    15. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    16. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    17. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.
    18. Goddard, Andrew, 2021. "Accountability and accounting in the NGO field comprising the UK and Africa – A Bordieusian analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Christophe Favoreu & David Carassus & Christophe Maurel, 2015. "Strategic management in the public sector: a rational, political or collaborative approach? [Le management stratégique en milieu public : approche rationnelle, politique ou collaborative ?]," Post-Print hal-02152509, HAL.
    20. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Startsev, Y (Старцев, Я.), 2015. "Development of a Concept of an Interdisciplinary Research Program of Formation of Complex Methodologies and Techniques of Management Development in Public Administration [Разработка Концепции Межди," Published Papers mn37, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:4:y:2011:i:1:p:9-29:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.