IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mosaro/v16y2015i2p1-18n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Style of Management and Chosen Sentiments and Attitudes Among Employees of Scientific Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Baruk Agnieszka Izabela

    (Łódź University of Technology, Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

The article presents issues associated with the style of management applied in scientific organizations in the context of sentiments and attitudes of employees. Attention is drawn particularly to the relations between the style of management perceived by employees and the level of their perceived contentedness and the perceived level of satisfaction, as well as between the perceived style of management and attitude reflecting their readiness to recommend an organization as an employer. The application of the method of statistical analysis, namely, the analysis of correspondence allowed drawing the conclusion that there are statistically important relations between the variables. These relations are comparably strongest in case of the perceived style of management and the level of satisfaction. Thus, it can be concluded that applying democratic style to employees favours stimulating their satisfaction and contentedness and at the same time contributes to assuming an open attitude characterized by the readiness to recommend an organization as a workplace and thus co-create its positive image.

Suggested Citation

  • Baruk Agnieszka Izabela, 2015. "Style of Management and Chosen Sentiments and Attitudes Among Employees of Scientific Organizations," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:1-18:n:5
    DOI: 10.14611/minib.16.02.2015.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14611/minib.16.02.2015.10
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14611/minib.16.02.2015.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M. & Shore, Lynn M, 2007. "The employee-organization relationship: where do we go from here?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4887, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Helm, Sabrina, 2011. "Employees' awareness of their impact on corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 657-663, July.
    3. Gary Davies & Rosa Chun & Michael A. Kamins, 2010. "Reputation gaps and the performance of service organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 530-546, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaveh Moghaddam & Thomas Weber & Pouya Seifzadeh & Sara Azarpanah, 2021. "Internal Reputation of the Firm: CEO Retention and Firm Market Performance," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 205-221, November.
    2. Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes & Inocencia Martínez-León & Gary Davies, 2014. "Managing internal stakeholders’ views of corporate reputation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(1), pages 83-111, March.
    3. Inocencia M. Martínez-León & Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes & Gary Davies, 2023. "The Virtuous Circle of Internal Corporate Reputation and Financial Performance," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 97-110, May.
    4. Inocencia María Martínez‐León & Isabel Olmedo‐Cifuentes, 2022. "Teachers’ views of corporate reputation: Influence on behavioral outcomes," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 579-605, September.
    5. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    6. Anna Rogozinska-Pawelczyk, 2022. "The Manager as an Organisation Agent during the Fourth Industrial Revolution," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 509-529.
    7. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    8. Snežana Lekić & Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Slavica Mandić & Jasmina Rajaković-Mijailović & Nemanja Lekić & Jelena Mijailović, 2020. "Analysis of the Quality of the Employee–Bank Relationship in Urban and Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Olga Å tangej & Vida Å kudienÄ—, 2016. "The Role Of Familial Trust In The Leader-Member Exchange," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(1).
    10. Pengxin Xie & Lian Zhou, 2022. "Keeping dispute resolution internal: Exploring the role of the industrial relations climate, organizational embeddedness and organizational turbulence," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 898-917, May.
    11. Vicenta Sierra & Oriol Iglesias & Stefan Markovic & Jatinder Jit Singh, 2017. "Does Ethical Image Build Equity in Corporate Services Brands? The Influence of Customer Perceived Ethicality on Affect, Perceived Quality, and Equity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 661-676, September.
    12. Qing Huan & Niu ZhanWen, 2018. "Knowledge management in consultancy involved LPS implementation projects via social media," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, March.
    13. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2010. "From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49811, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Muscalu Emanoil & Hulpus Ioana Alexandra & Faloba Viorica, 2015. "Management Analysis Regarding The Employees' Engagement Factors As Motivational Tools For Increasing Job Satisfaction And Commitement To The Organisation," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 259-263, February.
    15. Zhe Ouyang & Qian Sun & Yang Liu, 2024. "The impact of investor reaction to crisis events on corporate philanthropy: evidence from Chinese firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 139-163, February.
    16. Yeunjae Lee, 2022. "Employees’ Negative Megaphoning in Response to Organizational Injustice: The Mediating Role of Employee–Organization Relationship and Negative Affect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 89-103, June.
    17. Émilie Lapointe & Christian Vandenberghe, 2018. "Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 99-115, March.
    18. M. Audenaert & A. Vanderstraeten & D. Buyens, 2012. "Mutual Investment Employee-Organization Relationship: A Conceptual Model of How and When it is Functional," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/778, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Özgür Demirtaş & Aykut Arslan & Mustafa Karaca, 2019. "Why perceived organizational and supervisory family support is important for organizations? Evidence from the field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 841-869, August.
    20. Gross, Hellen P. & Ingerfurth, Stefan & Willems, Jurgen, 2021. "Employees as reputation advocates: Dimensions of employee job satisfaction explaining employees’ recommendation intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 405-413.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:1-18:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.