IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2015v1iip259-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Analysis Regarding The Employees' Engagement Factors As Motivational Tools For Increasing Job Satisfaction And Commitement To The Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • MUSCALU EMANOIL

    (FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, "LUCIAN BLAGA." UNIVERSITY, SIBIU, ROMANIA)

  • HULPUS IOANA ALEXANDRA

    (FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, "LUCIAN BLAGA" UNIVERSITY, SIBIU, ROMANIA)

  • FALOBA VIORICA

    (FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, "LUCIAN BLAGA" UNIVERSITY, SIBIU, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Regardless of the field, each organization has come to know and appreciate the true value of motivating staff and its involvement. Job satisfaction is worthy of interest both because of its beneficial effects on personal and organizational basis, being known that competitive organizations are those who know to pay attention to employee satisfaction. However, in practice it is extremely difficult to find how to engage employees, so they are present not only physically but also mentally and emotionally. Experts put forward that the ability to engage employees, making them partakers of the business, dedicated to the organization, will be one of the biggest organizational challenges in the next 10 years. (Berdarkar, M., Pandita, D., 2014) Consequently, human resource management, as a true art, must find the right "recipe" to make employees feel satisfaction, to contribute positively to the smooth running of the organization by encouraging their participation in decision-making processes. The organization is not solely responsible for the performance of staff, an overwhelming role having those employees who participate with their own strategies of action, to achieve the objectives set by management structures or implicitly assuming and expanding responsibilities including the freedom of decision. The special interest paid to the employee status at work and the relationship between the degree of involvement and the individual and organizational performance is the subject of numerous studies, this article proposing a synthesis of the current guidelines and an attempt to define the fundamental concepts as completely as possible .

Suggested Citation

  • Muscalu Emanoil & Hulpus Ioana Alexandra & Faloba Viorica, 2015. "Management Analysis Regarding The Employees' Engagement Factors As Motivational Tools For Increasing Job Satisfaction And Commitement To The Organisation," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 259-263, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:1ii:p:259-263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2015-01.Volumul%202/42_muscalu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M. & Shore, Lynn M, 2007. "The employee-organization relationship: where do we go from here?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4887, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Rogozinska-Pawelczyk, 2022. "The Manager as an Organisation Agent during the Fourth Industrial Revolution," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 509-529.
    2. Snežana Lekić & Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Slavica Mandić & Jasmina Rajaković-Mijailović & Nemanja Lekić & Jelena Mijailović, 2020. "Analysis of the Quality of the Employee–Bank Relationship in Urban and Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Olga Å tangej & Vida Å kudienÄ—, 2016. "The Role Of Familial Trust In The Leader-Member Exchange," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(1).
    4. Pengxin Xie & Lian Zhou, 2022. "Keeping dispute resolution internal: Exploring the role of the industrial relations climate, organizational embeddedness and organizational turbulence," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 898-917, May.
    5. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2010. "From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49811, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Yeunjae Lee, 2022. "Employees’ Negative Megaphoning in Response to Organizational Injustice: The Mediating Role of Employee–Organization Relationship and Negative Affect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 89-103, June.
    7. Émilie Lapointe & Christian Vandenberghe, 2018. "Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 99-115, March.
    8. M. Audenaert & A. Vanderstraeten & D. Buyens, 2012. "Mutual Investment Employee-Organization Relationship: A Conceptual Model of How and When it is Functional," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/778, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Özgür Demirtaş & Aykut Arslan & Mustafa Karaca, 2019. "Why perceived organizational and supervisory family support is important for organizations? Evidence from the field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 841-869, August.
    10. Casado, Renata & Caspersz, Donella, 2023. "The role of context in the psychological contract of skilled migrants," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    11. Oluseyi Aju & Eshani Beddewela, 2020. "Afrocentric Attitudinal Reciprocity and Social Expectations of Employees: The Role of Employee-Centred CSR in Africa," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 763-781, February.
    12. Angela J. Xu & Raymond Loi & Hang-yue Ngo, 2016. "Ethical Leadership Behavior and Employee Justice Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Trust in Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 493-504, March.
    13. Lin, Chiou-Shiu & Jin, Ming & Huang, Pei-Chi & Xiao, Ran, 2023. "Does it take two to tango? The joint role of high-performance work systems and ethical leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Charlotte K. Marx & Mareike Reimann & Martin Diewald, 2021. "Do Work–Life Measures Really Matter? The Impact of Flexible Working Hours and Home-Based Teleworking in Preventing Voluntary Employee Exits," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Elizabeth George & Prithviraj Chattopadhyay & Carmen Kaman Ng, 2016. "The relationship between workgroup blending and perceived organizational inducements: The mediating roles of tasks and relationships," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(3), pages 538-562, August.
    16. Lilian Obiageli Orogbu & Leonard Tabugbo Onwuzuligbo & Chinedu Uzochukwu Onyeizugbe & Angela Agu Ifeyinwa, 2016. "Employee Engagement and Performance in Selected Ministries in Anambra State Civil Service of Nigeria," Post-Print hal-03129998, HAL.
    17. Gatignon-Turnau, Anne-Laure & Mignonac, Karim, 2015. "(Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 7-18.
    18. Kalina Grzesiuk, 2016. "Unethical Behaviour of Organisations from a Social Network Perspective. A Literature Review," Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, vol. 19(4), pages 23-37, December.
    19. Lalit Kumar Yadav & Nagendra Yadav, 2018. "Gender Stereotyping of Leadership," Paradigm, , vol. 22(1), pages 30-45, June.
    20. Fatemeh Rezazadeh & Mir Ali Seyyed-Naghavi & Sima Rezazadeh, 2022. "Factors affecting the employee-organization relationship with focus on explaining the importance and status of entrepreneurship," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 189-204, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:1ii:p:259-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.