IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v14y2019i1p31-47n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The attitude of consumers towards “Made in Italy” products. An empirical analysis among Italian customers

Author

Listed:
  • Cappelli Lucio

    (University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Italy)

  • D’ascenzo Fabrizio

    (University Sapienza of Rome, Italy)

  • Ruggieri Roberto

    (University Sapienza of Rome, Italy)

  • Rossetti Francesca

    (University Sapienza of Rome, Italy)

  • Scalingi Alessandra

    (University Sapienza of Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The paper is part of a broader research project studying consumer’s attitude towards “Made in Italy” products through empirical investigation. The research questions addressed are: 1) Does recognition in terms of the qualitative characterization of “Made in Italy” products exist? And if so, 2) are people willing to pay, in quantitative terms, a premium price for such products? From a theoretical standpoint, the research seeks to fill a gap in the literature, since studies combining the “made in” characteristic with measured “willingness to pay” are neither conventional nor numerous. The specific purpose of this contribution is to analyze the relationship between the purchase of “Made in Italy” products, recognition of the quality and willingness to pay a premium price on the part of Italian consumers, reporting the results of an empirical research. The survey involved a total of 315 Italian consumers while three commodity sectors were analysed: food, fashion and mechanical automation. The results confirm that there is a propensity to purchase “Made in Italy” products which does not seem to be a matter of irrational consumer behaviour. “Made in Italy” is confirmed as a conceptual category consolidated in the minds of consumers, since there is clear recognition of these products in terms of qualitative characterization. These and other results of the research (which need to be confirmed and extended with further empirical investigations) should prove relevant both to the literature and as indications for public policies and the strategies of companies operating in the sectors examined. For the literature this research can be useful because there is no complete overview of quantitative data on the premium price. It can also serve for public policies because quantification of the premium price can influence the choices and strategies of companies. This study shows a significant willingness to pay a premium price for the three sectors analyzed, although the premium price is not homogeneous: while the measures range mostly between 10 and 30%, higher values appear for products in the food sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Cappelli Lucio & D’ascenzo Fabrizio & Ruggieri Roberto & Rossetti Francesca & Scalingi Alessandra, 2019. "The attitude of consumers towards “Made in Italy” products. An empirical analysis among Italian customers," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 31-47, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:31-47:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2019-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucio Cappelli & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Luisa Natale & Francesca Rossetti & Roberto Ruggieri & Domenico Vistocco, 2017. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for a “Made in” Product? An Empirical Investigation on “Made in Italy”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259, September.
    3. Ankamah-Yeboah, Isaac & Nielsen, Max & Nielsen, Rasmus, 2016. "Price premium of organic salmon in Danish retail sale," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 54-60.
    4. Marco Bettiol & Eleonora Di Maria, 2012. "Introduzione: oltre la dicotomia manifattura-servizi. un territorio ancora da esplorare," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 5-11.
    5. Paletto, Alessandro & Notaro, Sandra, 2018. "Secondary wood manufactures' willingness-to-pay for certified wood products in Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 65-72.
    6. Maria Chiarvesio & Eleonora Maria & Stefano Micelli, 2013. "Sourcing from Northern and Southern Countries: The Global Value Chain Approach Applied to Italian SMEs," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(3), pages 389-404, November.
    7. Yohan Bernard & Zarrouk-Karoui Sarra, 2014. "Reinforcing willingness to buy and to pay due to consumer affinity towards a foreign country," Post-Print hal-01315743, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfiya R. Alikberova, 2015. "Academic Expansion of Peoples’ Republic of China on the Example of Confucius Institutes Functioning in Russian Federation," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, April.
    2. YAMADA Keigo, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Andréa Jean Baker, 2017. "Algorithms to Assess Music Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    4. Jakub Michal & David Březina & Dalibor Šafařík & Václav Kupčák & Andrea Sujová & Jitka Fialová, 2019. "Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Marcello Risitano & Rosaria Romano & Vincenzo Rusciano & Gennaro Civero & Debora Scarpato, 2022. "The impact of sustainability on marketing strategy and business performance: The case of Italian fisheries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1538-1551, May.
    6. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    7. Matthias Staudigel & Aleksej Trubnikov, 2022. "High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 309-334, April.
    8. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    10. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    12. Chiara Dalle Nogare & Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, 2021. "Do museums foster innovation through engagement with the cultural and creative industries?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 671-704, December.
    13. Malgorzata Galecka & Katarzyna Smolny, 2021. "Productivity of Public Theatres in the Times of COVID-19: The Example of Polish Theatres," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 667-678.
    14. Jen D Snowball & Geoff G Antrobus, 2021. "Festival value in multicultural contexts: City festivals in South Africa," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(6), pages 1256-1275, September.
    15. Cécile Doustaly & Vishalakshi Roy, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Sustainability of Cultural Work in the UK since the COVID-19 Pandemic and Examination of Universal Basic Income as a Solution for Cultural Workers," Post-Print hal-03767292, HAL.
    16. Kabanda,Patrick, 2016. "Creative trade for human development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7684, The World Bank.
    17. Rushton, Michael, 2019. "Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Silvia Cerisola, 2018. "Multiple creative talents and their determinants at the local level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 243-269, May.
    19. Weber, Cameron & Zhen, Ying & Arias, JJ, 2022. "Practice, Entrepreneurship and Subjectivity in Artist Identification with Applications to the Covid-Era," MPRA Paper 115712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Vincent FRIGANT & Martin ZUMPE, 2014. "The persistent heterogeneity of trade patterns: A comparison of four European Automotive Global Production Networks," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2014-24, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:31-47:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.