IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03767292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Sustainability of Cultural Work in the UK since the COVID-19 Pandemic and Examination of Universal Basic Income as a Solution for Cultural Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Doustaly

    (Héritages - UMR 9022 - Héritages : Culture(s), Patrimoine(s), Création(s) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - MC - Ministère de la Culture - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université)

  • Vishalakshi Roy

    (University of Warwick [Coventry])

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns across the world have greatly affected an already vulnerable cultural economy and the structural precarity of many cultural workers. After documenting the impacts of the pandemic in the cultural sector and the effectiveness of governmental responses in the UK and in Europe, the article focuses on the visual arts and explores calls for reforms of the cultural economy. While the UK government's recovery plan went against the country's cultural policy tradition due to the plan's interventionist and financially generous nature, it disproportionally benefitted organisations rather than individuals working in the sector, especially in England. The study, conducted on visual arts workers in the UK, shows that many were unable to access these financial recovery schemes and fell through the cracks of the complex criteria set for these funds. This article informs the current debate on measures that are potentially more economically sustainable and wellbeing protective than those currently in place for cultural workers, such as Universal Basic Income. Its applicability is explored with reference to the historic French and recent Irish examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Doustaly & Vishalakshi Roy, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Sustainability of Cultural Work in the UK since the COVID-19 Pandemic and Examination of Universal Basic Income as a Solution for Cultural Workers," Post-Print hal-03767292, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03767292
    DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15050196
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03767292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03767292/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3390/jrfm15050196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259, September.
    2. Charlie Wall-Andrews & Emma Walker & Wendy Cukier, 2021. "Support Mechanisms for Canada’s Cultural and Creative Sectors during COVID-19," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicola Walshe & Hilary Bungay & Anna Dadswell, 2023. "Sustainable Outdoor Education: Organisations Connecting Children and Young People with Nature through the Arts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cécile Doustaly & Vishalakshi Roy, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Sustainability of Cultural Work in the UK since the COVID-19 Pandemic and Examination of Universal Basic Income as a Solution for Cultural Workers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Alfiya R. Alikberova, 2015. "Academic Expansion of Peoples’ Republic of China on the Example of Confucius Institutes Functioning in Russian Federation," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, April.
    3. YAMADA Keigo, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Andréa Jean Baker, 2017. "Algorithms to Assess Music Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    5. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Rushton, Michael, 2019. "Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Weber, Cameron & Zhen, Ying & Arias, JJ, 2022. "Practice, Entrepreneurship and Subjectivity in Artist Identification with Applications to the Covid-Era," MPRA Paper 115712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "World Heritage: Where Are We? An Empirical Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-31, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    9. Enrico Bertacchini & Federico Revelli, 2021. "Kalòs kai agathòs? government quality and cultural heritage in the regions of Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 513-539, October.
    10. Kanika Khurana & Atanu Ghosh, 2023. "Management in the Performing Arts: An Empirical Exploration of Organizational Structures in Indian Theatre," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 67-84, January.
    11. Sang Do Park, 2022. "Policy Discourse Among the Chinese Public on Initiatives for Cultural and Creative Industries: Text Mining Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    12. Francesco Angelini & Massimiliano Castellani & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2022. "Overconfidence in the art market: a bargaining pricing model with asymmetric disinformation," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 961-988, October.
    13. Kabanda,Patrick, 2014. "The creative wealth of nations : how the performing arts can advance development and human progress," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7118, The World Bank.
    14. Jane Zheng, 2021. "STRUCTURING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A ‘CREATIVE CITY’: Urban Sculpture Planning in Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 795-813, September.
    15. Saccone, Donatella & Santagata Walter & Bertacchini Enrico, 2012. "A new approach for cultural projects impact assessment," EBLA Working Papers 201207, University of Turin.
    16. Maria Rita Pinto & Serena Viola & Anna Onesti & Francesca Ciampa, 2020. "Artists Residencies, Challenges and Opportunities for Communities’ Empowerment and Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Maria del Mar Casanovas-Rubio & Carolina Christen & Luz María Valarezo & Jaume Bofill & Nela Filimon & Jaume Armengou, 2020. "Decision-Making Tool for Enhancing the Sustainable Management of Cultural Institutions: Season Content Programming at Palau De La Música Catalana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Enrico E. Bertacchini & Chiara Dalle Nogare & Raffaele Scuderi, 2018. "Ownership, organization structure and public service provision: the case of museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 619-643, November.
    19. Santagata Walter & Bertacchini Enrico, 2011. "Creative Atmosphere: Cultural Industries and Local Development," EBLA Working Papers 201104, University of Turin.
    20. Yan Zhang, 2012. "Towards an Institutional Approach of Self-governance on Cultural Heritage," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03767292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.