IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v17y2020i2p50-62n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Kehler Management System: A Holistic Framework for the Administration of Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Böhmer Roland

    (University of Applied Sciences Kehl, School of Public Administration, Kehl, Germany)

  • Busbach-Richard Uwe

    (University of Applied Sciences Kehl, School of Public Administration, Kehl, Germany)

  • Kiesel Britta

    (University of Applied Sciences Kehl, School of Public Administration, Kehl, Germany)

Abstract

Research purpose. Especially against the background of a globalised world, municipal managers are confronted with increasingly complex tasks. Furthermore, the range of tasks of a municipality and its stakeholders are very heterogeneous. While repetitive work processes are basically characterised by a clear starting position and objectives and the resources required to achieve these objectives are known and available, these manageable prerequisites are usually not present in complex public administration systems. The transfer of purely management ratio-based approaches from the business management sector is difficult for public administration, since not profit but the common good is the prioritized target. Municipal managers need a holistic approach that addresses the municipal council, the population, companies, administrative organization and budget management in order to be able to control municipalities within a diagnostic framework.Design/Methodology/Approach. First of all, a brief insight into the history of the new municipal budget law in Germany is given. The aim of the budget law is to reform the budget and accounting system, but above all, to strengthen municipal control through goal orientation. After an overview of the current diagnostic frameworks, it becomes clear that a holistic approach is missing. To develop such a framework, success factors for municipal control are identified. These are then combined into success clusters to create a more manageable, holistic structure for implementation – the Kehler Management System (KMS). A survey and two case studies, which were conducted within two years in the municipality of Ottersweier, empirically prove the practical relevance of the KMS approach.Findings. 36 success factors were identified, which were structured into six success clusters. One success cluster addresses the trusting cooperation between politics and administration (in short: politics and administration). A culture of leadership and cooperation within the administration is another cluster of success (in short: culture of leadership and cooperation). Sustainable human resources management forms the third cluster of success factors (in short: human resources management). A further cluster could be identified in the strategic area (in short: strategy). A fifth cluster of success relates to the conversion to a modern budget and accounting system, which considers resource consumption (in short: municipal accrual accounting as a control instrument). The last success cluster addresses changes in the administrative environment (in short: learning organization). The six success clusters are not independent, however, these have a causal order. The municipal accrual accounting as a control instrument and the integration of the strategy are fundamental for the other four success clusters, which address the implementation of the reform process.Originality/Value/Practical implications. In 2015, the framework of the KMS was evaluated in a survey of 115 municipalities with up to 50,000 inhabitants and was considered coherent and helpful by the municipal executives. In individual communities like Ottersweier, detailed diagnostic analyses based on the Kehler Management System were conducted with various internal stakeholders, which led to strategy development, resource-oriented budget management, operational implementation, and a continuous improvement process. However, only the internal view of the municipal administration is currently addressed. In an extension of the KMS, further research aims at integrating the external view of citizens and companies into the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Böhmer Roland & Busbach-Richard Uwe & Kiesel Britta, 2020. "The Kehler Management System: A Holistic Framework for the Administration of Municipalities," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 50-62, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:50-62:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2020-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2020-0020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2020-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Moullin, 2017. "Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(4), pages 442-458, April.
    2. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S. O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2007. "Relations among Measures, Climate of Control, and Performance Measurement Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 935-982, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    2. Stewart Kaupa & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, 2020. "Challenges in the Implementation of Performance Management System in Namibian Public Sector," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 25-34, June.
    3. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2022. "Insight into the Critical Success Factors of Performance-Based Budgeting Implementation in the Public Sector for Sustainable Development in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-37, October.
    4. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    5. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2013. "The Role of Performance Measures in the Intertemporal Decisions of Business Unit Managers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 925-961, September.
    6. Alicja Gębczyńska & Renata Brajer-Marczak, 2020. "Review of Selected Performance Measurement Models Used in Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Elaine Chepkoskei & Kellen Kiambati & Irura Ng’ang’a, 2021. "Relationship between performance contracting and the implementation of strategic objectives in Kenyan public universities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 170-182, March.
    8. Kurt Schobel & Peter Drogosiewicz, 2018. "Adoption Of The Balanced Scorecard By Municipal Governments: Evidence From Canada," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14.
    9. LIN, Zhijun & YU, Zengbiao & ZHANG, Liqun, 2014. "Performance outcomes of balanced scorecard application in hospital administration in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Monica Kapuria & Edward R. Maguire, 2022. "Performance Management and the Police Response to Women in India," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Domenico Consoli & Selena Aureli, 2018. "Un framework integrato per la misura dell?innovazione del Piano Nazionale Scuola Digitale (PNSD)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 139-164.
    12. Francesca Francioli, 2018. "Strategic performance management systems in Italian banks. A research note," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 155-178.
    13. Carlos Suárez-Gargallo & Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez, 2021. "How the Balanced Scorecard Is Implemented in the Spanish Footwear Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Jongwoon (Willie) Choi & Gary W. Hecht & William B. Tayler, 2013. "Strategy Selection, Surrogation, and Strategic Performance Measurement Systems," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 105-133, March.
    15. Salterio, Steven E., 2018. "Signaling effects of scholarly profiles–the editorial teams of North American accounting association journals: A personal perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 78-83.
    16. Fernández, Flavia M, 2021. "Cuadro de Mando Integral en la enseñanza de grado. Una propuesta integradora [Balanced Scorecard in degree teaching. An integrated view]," MPRA Paper 105568, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Teemu Malmi & Markus Granlund, 2009. "Agreeing on Problems, Where are the Solutions? A Reply to Quattrone," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 631-639.
    18. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge, 2018. "Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 919-935, July.
    19. Ralph Kober & Deryl Northcott, 2021. "Testing cause‐and‐effect relationships within a balanced scorecard," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1815-1849, April.
    20. Michaela Kotková Stříteská & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Performance Driven Culture in the Public Sector: The Case of Nordic Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance analyses of municipalities; resource-oriented budget in municipalities;

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:50-62:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.