IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i1p4-d474845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Driven Culture in the Public Sector: The Case of Nordic Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Kotková Stříteská

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, CZ53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Yee Yee Sein

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, CZ53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Public sector organizations face a lack of efficiency and ineffectiveness in providing their mandates due to fear of change among the public service workers. Public sector managers can instill a high performance-driven culture in employees of the public sector. For this reason, the study aims to define a set of key characteristics of organizational culture that contribute to effective performance measurement and management of public sector organizations. The qualitative research method is employed in this paper using case study comparative analysis. To get the objectives of the study, selected local governments from three different Nordic countries are analyzed. As discovered from the case study analysis, these local governments have successfully constructed and implemented performance measurement and management systems. Concurrently, they practice performance-driven culture key characteristics to achieve their organizational targets without any significant difficulties. Three key characteristics (strong performance-driven leadership, report and communicate performance, review and discuss performance) are used in all selected local governments, and one (the reward system) is missing. All four key characteristics are employed only in Helsinki, which is a benchmark for other local governments. This study’s results can thus serve as an example of best practice for other public sector organizations within Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Kotková Stříteská & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Performance Driven Culture in the Public Sector: The Case of Nordic Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:4-:d:474845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George A. Marcoulides & Ronald H. Heck, 1993. "Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 209-225, May.
    2. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ghadge, Abhijeet & Raut, Rakesh, 2020. "A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs- A review and empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Knein, Ernesto & Greven, Andrea & Bendig, David & Brettel, Malte, 2020. "Culture and cross-functional coopetition: The interplay of organizational and national culture," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2).
    4. Max Moullin, 2017. "Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(4), pages 442-458, April.
    5. Julia Wolf, 2013. "Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 92-108, February.
    6. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Kintu & André Waal, 2021. "Impact of structure and culture on organizational performance: the case of Uganda’s High Court," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Alexandros Sahinidis & Zorzeta Bakaki, 2022. "The Impact of Strong Cultures on Organisational Performance in Public Organisations: The Case of the Greek Public Administration," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Wai-Ming To & Billy T. W. Yu, 2021. "Effects of Difficult Coworkers on Employees’ Responses in Macao’s Public Organizations—The Mediating Role of Perceived Stress," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Alkinoos Psarras & Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Ioannis Salmon & Yannis Psaromiligkos & Lazaros Vryzidis, 2022. "A Change Management Approach with the Support of the Balanced Scorecard and the Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fathi Alarabi Yosef & Luay Jum’a & Muntasir Alatoom, 2023. "Identifying and Categorizing Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Based on Triple Bottom Line Dimensions: Evaluation of Practice Implementation in the Cement Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    3. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:xd9nz is not listed on IDEAS
    5. José F. Molina-Azorin & Maria D. López-Gamero & Juan José Tarí & Jorge Pereira-Moliner & Eva M. Pertusa-Ortega, 2021. "Environmental Management, Human Resource Management and Green Human Resource Management: A Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Stewart Kaupa & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, 2020. "Challenges in the Implementation of Performance Management System in Namibian Public Sector," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 25-34, June.
    7. Kamalesh Kumar & Giacomo Boesso & Giovanna Michelon, 2016. "How Do Strengths and Weaknesses in Corporate Social Performance Across Different Stakeholder Domains Affect Company Performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 277-292, May.
    8. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    10. Alisher Khamdamov & Zhiwei Tang & Muhammad Ali Hussain, 2023. "Unpacking Parallel Mediation Processes between Green HRM Practices and Sustainable Environmental Performance: Evidence from Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Rao Indu, 2009. "The Behavioral Equivalence of Organizational Culture," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-07-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Jääskeläinen, Aki, 2021. "The relational outcomes of performance management in buyer-supplier relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Maria Persdotter Isaksson & Hana Hulthén & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Environmentally Sustainable Logistics Performance Management Process Integration between Buyers and 3PLs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Leslie A. Laam & George Godlewski & Wayne Psek, 2023. "A description and mathematization of an adaptation-based culture mechanism," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 363-390, June.
    15. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2018. "The Selected Method and Tools for Performance Measurement in the Green Supply Chain—Survey Analysis in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Cosmin MATIS, 2020. "A Study Regarding the Correlations that Exist between Types of Cultures in Banking Organizations and the Country of Origin of the Majority Capital, the Gender of the Employees, their Age, Level of Exp," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 49-60.
    17. Kwantes, Catherine T. & Boglarsky, Cheryl A., 2007. "Perceptions of organizational culture, leadership effectiveness and personal effectiveness across six countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 204-230, June.
    18. Tiago Melo, 2012. "Determinants of corporate social performance: the influence of organizational culture, management tenure and financial performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 33-47, March.
    19. Calış Duman, Meral & Akdemir, Bunyamin, 2021. "A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Abraham Carmeli & Asher Tishler, 2004. "Resources, capabilities, and the performance of industrial firms: A multivariate analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6-7), pages 299-315.
    21. Seng-Su Tsang & Zhih-Lin Liu & Thi Vinh Tran Nguyen, 2023. "Family–work conflict and work-from-home productivity: do work engagement and self-efficacy mediate?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:4-:d:474845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.