IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/afr232.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Examining the Causal Relationships of Balanced Scorecard Perspectives on Organizational Performance Improvement: A Case Study from the Indonesian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Alpha Nur Setyawan Pudjono

    (School of Business and Management Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia. Author-2-Name: Dermawan Wibisono Author-2-Workplace-Name: "School of Business and Management Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, 40132, Bandung, Indonesia. " Author-3-Name: Ima Fatima Author-3-Workplace-Name: Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, 40132, Bandung, Indonesia. Author-4-Name: Ilma Nurul Rachmania Author-4-Workplace-Name: School of Business and Management Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, 40132, Bandung, Indonesia. Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

" Objective - This research aimed to explore the causal relationships among performance indicators in the Balanced Scorecard framework of the Indonesia Public Sector. Methodology/Technique - Quantitative and path analysis were used to collect and analyze primary data. The research included 24 Regional Public Sector Offices and 268 Local Public Sector Offices as part of the sample. Findings - The findings showed substantial causal relationships within the Public Sector Balanced Scorecard perspectives, with training significantly influencing employee performance in taxation dissemination and tax supervision activities. However, the impact of training on tax audit performance was considered insignificant. The empirical evidence suggested that tax audit was the only performance indicator positively associated with tax compliance. Determinant factors for tax revenue included tax compliance, dissemination, audit, and supervision. Novelty - This research contributes crucial insights by showing intricate causal relationships among performance indicators, indicating the significant impact of training on distinct facets of employee performance. Additionally, the study identifies tax audits as an essential factor positively influencing tax compliance. The analysis provides new perspectives on the applicability of the Balanced Scorecard in the public sector context, particularly in developing countries. Type of Paper - Empirical"

Suggested Citation

  • Alpha Nur Setyawan Pudjono, 2024. "Examining the Causal Relationships of Balanced Scorecard Perspectives on Organizational Performance Improvement: A Case Study from the Indonesian Public Sector," GATR Journals afr232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr232
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2024.8.4(3)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/AFR/pdf_files/AFR-Vol-8(4)/3.Alpha%20Nur%20Setyawan%20Pudjono.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2024.8.4(3)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Morard & Alexandru Stancu & Christophe Jeannette, 2013. "Time Evolution Analysis And Forecast Of Key Performance Indicators In A Balanced Scorecard," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-27.
    2. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S. O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2007. "Relations among Measures, Climate of Control, and Performance Measurement Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 935-982, September.
    3. Yael Perlman, 2013. "Causal Relationships in the Balanced Scorecard: A Path Analysis Approach," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 70-79, February.
    4. Mooraj, Stella & Oyon, Daniel & Hostettler, Didier, 1999. "The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 481-491, October.
    5. Touchton,Michael Ryan & Wampler,Brian & Peixoto,Tiago Carneiro, 2019. "Of Governance and Revenue : Participatory Institutions and Tax Compliance in Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8797, The World Bank.
    6. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. LIN, Zhijun & YU, Zengbiao & ZHANG, Liqun, 2014. "Performance outcomes of balanced scorecard application in hospital administration in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Francesca Francioli, 2018. "Strategic performance management systems in Italian banks. A research note," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 155-178.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    4. Carlos Suárez-Gargallo & Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez, 2021. "How the Balanced Scorecard Is Implemented in the Spanish Footwear Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Ralph Kober & Deryl Northcott, 2021. "Testing cause‐and‐effect relationships within a balanced scorecard," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1815-1849, April.
    6. Abdulhamid Rahuma & Sami Fethi, 2022. "A new approach to evaluate environmental strategy: Empirical evidence from international petroleum companies using the balanced scorecard model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3152-3165, November.
    7. Anja Heinicke, 2018. "Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 457-502, February.
    8. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Mayka, Lindsay & Abbott, Jared, 2023. "Varieties of participatory institutions and interest intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Denis Royer & Martin Meints, 2009. "Enterprise Identity Management – Towards a Decision Support Framework Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 245-253, June.
    11. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    12. H A Akkermans & K E van Oorschot, 2005. "Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 931-941, August.
    13. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2023. "Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 123-132.
    14. Patrizia Di Tullio & Matteo La Torre & Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2021. "Toward performance measurement systems based on business models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 1), pages 97-122.
    15. Rui Silva & Cidália Oliveira, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation in Tangible and Intangible Resource Allocation: A Qualitative Multi Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Selena Aureli & Andrea Cardoni & Mara Del Baldo & Rosa Lombardi, 2018. "The Balanced Scorecard Logic in The Management Control and Reporting of Small Business Company Networks: A Case Study," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 191-215, June.
    17. Chrisovalantis Malesios & Prasanta K. Dey & Fuad Ben Abdelaziz, 2020. "Supply chain sustainability performance measurement of small and medium sized enterprises using structural equation modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 623-653, November.
    18. Namık Kemal Erdoğan & Ahmet Onay & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2019. "Measuring the Performance of Retailer Firms Listed in BIST under the Balanced Scorecard Perspective by Using Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP Based Pythagorean Fuzzy TODIM Methodology," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 7(2), pages 333-350, December.
    19. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard: Fashion or Virus?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    20. Fethi, Sami & Rahuma, Abdulhamid, 2020. "The impact of eco-innovation on CO2 emission reductions: Evidence from selected petroleum companies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 108-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Balanced Scorecard; Path Analysis; Public Sector; Taxation; Performance Indicators.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.