IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjrecm/v7y2019i1p290-299n18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Dealing with Resistance to Change

Author

Listed:
  • Karaxha Halit

    (University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo)

Abstract

The study focuses on effective methods used to address resistance to business change. The aim of the study is to provide information related to methods of handling resistance to change and to present empirical results for each method that is used. In the study, the author uses quantitative methods, and more concretely, the questionnaire technique for data collection. Quantitative research methods that are used include linear regression, cross-tabulations and Pearson Chi-Square test. In this study, 399 businesses in Kosovo were involved. 64 cases of study (businesses) were excluded from the study because these businesses did not use any of the methods presented in the resistance treatment study. The results of the study show that support as a method of resistance treatment is mostly used by the businesses under consideration. The use of these methods has made the changes to be more effective in increasing revenue, providing superior organisational performance and steady market position. This study creates value for businesses, focusing on the importance of using methods for addressing resistance and the success of changes in organisations. However, in reality many initiatives for change fail in achieving their objectives. This fact promotes the interest in recognising those factors that influence the successful implementation of change efforts in organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Karaxha Halit, 2019. "Methods for Dealing with Resistance to Change," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 290-299, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:290-299:n:18
    DOI: 10.2478/bjreecm-2019-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2019-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bjreecm-2019-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    2. Udjo Eseroghene Franklin & Benjamin Balbuena Aguenza, 2016. "Obstacles, Resistance and Impact of Change in Organizations: An Examination of the Saudi Telecommunication Company (STC)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 23-37, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    2. Gebauer, Heiko & Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 57-73.
    3. Young-Choon Kim & Taekjin Shin & Sangchan Park, 2021. "Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 435-465, June.
    4. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    5. Yannick LUNG & Bernard JULLIEN & Christophe MIDLER, 2016. "From the Logan to the Kwid. \r\nAmbidexterity, reverse and fractal innovation, design-to-cost: recipes from Renault\'s Entry strategy," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2016-19, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    6. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.
    7. Innan Sasaki & Niina Nummela & Davide Ravasi, 2021. "Managing cultural specificity and cultural embeddedness when internationalizing: Cultural strategies of Japanese craft firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(2), pages 245-281, March.
    8. Theodosiou, Marios & Leonidou, Leonidas C., 2003. "Standardization versus adaptation of international marketing strategy: an integrative assessment of the empirical research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 141-171, April.
    9. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.
    10. Phillips, Paul & Moutinho, Luiz, 2014. "Critical review of strategic planning research in hospitality and tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 96-120.
    11. Srikant, Chethan D., 2019. "Impression management strategies to gain regulatory approval," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-153.
    12. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Business Models To Meet The Challenges Of The Global Economy. A Literature Review," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 127-146, December.
    13. Marco Te Brömmelstroet & Luca Bertolini, 2010. "Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 85-104, January.
    14. Bjorn Remneland Wikhamn & Alexander Styhre, 2019. "Open Innovation Groundwork," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, January.
    15. Bryan T. Stinchfield & Reed E. Nelson & Matthew S. Wood, 2013. "Learning from Levi–Strauss’ Legacy: Art, Craft, Engineering, Bricolage, and Brokerage in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(4), pages 889-921, July.
    16. Lant Pritchett & Salimah Samji & Jeffrey S. Hammer, 2012. "It's All about MeE: Using Structured Experiential Learning ('e') to Crawl the Design Space," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-104, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Ford, David & Mouzas, Stefanos, 2008. "Is there any hope? The idea of strategy in business networks," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 64-78.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3068 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Adamides, Emmanuel D. & Voutsina, Marinie, 2006. "The double-helix model of manufacturing and marketing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 3-18, November.
    20. Lucien Véran & Fabienne Chameroy, 2015. "Methods of capturing and keeping audiences within the digital creative industries [Modalités de captation et de conservation des publics au sein des industries créatives numérisées]," Post-Print hal-02092053, HAL.
    21. Paul Wlllman & Alan Cave, 1994. "The Union of the Future: Super-Unions or Joint Ventures?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 395-412, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:290-299:n:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.