IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tho/journl/v24y2018n2p325-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budgetary Participation And Its Impact On Individual Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliansyah Yuliansyah

    (University of Lampung, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia)

  • Biana Adha Inapty

    (University of Mataram, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Dahlan

    (University of Padjajaran, Accounting Department, Indonesia)

  • Intan Oktri Agtia

    (University of Lampung, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia)

Abstract

Purpose – The study examines the influence of budgeting participation on employee performance. The mediating variables are pride in membership (PIM) and job satisfaction (JS). Design – We distributed a survey to 200 hotel employees in Lombok and gained 108 responses. Methodology – Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) using SmartPLS software was used to analyse these hypotheses, using 88 usable data. Findings – The analysis revealed that budgeting participation has a positive influence on individual performance both directly and indirectly, through pride in membership and job satisfaction. In other words, there is a positive relationship between budgeting participation and employee performance which is fully mediated by pride in membership and job satisfaction. Originality of the research – This study enriches management accounting literature, especially in respect to employee involvement in budgeting in the hotel industry. Prior studies have found difficulties analysing the effect of employees' pride in organisational membership in management accounting studies

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Biana Adha Inapty & Muhammad Dahlan & Intan Oktri Agtia, 2018. "Budgetary Participation And Its Impact On Individual Performance," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 24(2), pages 325-340, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:tho:journl:v:24:y:2018:n:2:p:325-340
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.2.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/311221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.2.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lau, Chong M & Tan, Sharon L C, 2003. "The Effects of Participation and Job-Relevant Information on the Relationship between Evaluative Style and Job Satisfaction," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 17-34, July.
    2. Lau, Chong M. & Sholihin, Mahfud, 2005. "Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 389-413.
    3. Brownell, Peter & Dunk, Alan S., 1991. "Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: Some methodological issues and empirical investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 693-703.
    4. Eric O. Olsen & Honggeng Zhou & Denis M.S. Lee & Yoke‐Eng Ng & Chow Chewn Chong & Pean Padunchwit, 2007. "Performance measurement system and relationships with performance results," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 559-582, September.
    5. Agbejule, Adebayo & Saarikoski, Lotta, 2006. "The effect of cost management knowledge on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 427-440.
    6. Burney, Laurie L. & Henle, Christine A. & Widener, Sally K., 2009. "A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra- and in-role performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 305-321, April.
    7. Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Ashfaq Ahmad Khan, 2017. "A revisit of the participative budgeting and employees’ self-efficacy interrelationship – empirical evidence from Indonesia’s public sector," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 213-230, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lau, Chong M. & Martin-Sardesai, Ann V., 2012. "The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 157-172.
    2. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2022. "The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 371-402, September.
    3. Chong Lau & Brigitte Oger, 2019. "The effects of comprehensive performance measurement systems on information overload, job-relevant information, role clarity and procedural fairness," Working Papers halshs-02300746, HAL.
    4. LIN, Zhijun & YU, Zengbiao & ZHANG, Liqun, 2014. "Performance outcomes of balanced scorecard application in hospital administration in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.
    6. Bonache, Adrien & Maurice, Jonathan & Georgescu, Irène, 2009. "Enseignement d'une meta-analyse sur le lien participation budgétaire-performance managériale [Lesson from Meta-analysis for the relation between budgetary participation and managerial performance]," MPRA Paper 12958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Langevin, Pascal & Mendoza, Carla, 2013. "How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-222.
    8. Prabhu Sivabalan & Peter Booth & Teemu Malmi & David A. Brown, 2009. "An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 849-871, December.
    9. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    10. Chong Lau & Christen Buckland, 2000. "Budget emphasis, participation, task difficulty and performance: the effect of diversity within culture," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 37-55.
    11. Parker, Robert J. & Kyj, Larissa, 2006. "Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-45, January.
    12. George Kominis & Clive R. Emmanuel, 2005. "Exploring the reward preferences for middle level managers," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 54-76, April.
    13. Vincent Chong & Kar Chong, 1997. "Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 268-276.
    14. Chong, Vincent K., 1996. "Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 415-421, July.
    15. Ahyar Yuniawan & Udin Udin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, and Meaningful Work on Employee‘s Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 72-82.
    16. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    17. Emine Yilmaz Karakoc & Gokhan Ozer, 2016. "An investigation of Budget-Related Antecedents of Job Performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(3), pages 38-53, April.
    18. Azman ISMAIL & Rozanariah MOHD SANI & Mohd Hamran MOHAMAD, 2014. "Communication Openness In Performance Appraisal Systems Enhancing Job Satisfaction," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(5), pages 98-109, June.
    19. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    20. Cuguero, Natalia & Rosanas, Josep M., 2011. "The next generation of management control systems: Justice and fairness as antecedents for goal congruence," IESE Research Papers D/917, IESE Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgeting participation; Pride in membership; job satisfaction; individual performance; hospitality industry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tho:journl:v:24:y:2018:n:2:p:325-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Montan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.fthm.uniri.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.