IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v48y2016i1p17-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences

Author

Listed:
  • Derfuss, Klaus

Abstract

The relationship of participative budgeting with performance presents a much debated but still unsettled issue in management accounting research. In this paper, meta-analysis is used to explore, whether methodological concerns, such as the level of analysis, sample selection, and variations in the measurement of performance, and theoretical concerns, such as industry differences, help explain observed inconsistencies in prior results. In line with theoretical predictions, the overall participative budgeting–performance relation is positive and significant. Moreover, this relation and the positive, significant ones of participative budgeting with departmental, budgetary, and managerial performance generalize across settings. In addition, for the relation with managerial performance, moderating influences of objective versus subjective and relative versus absolute self-rating measures of performance as well as private versus public sector samples emerge, which thus are important boundary conditions for future theory development. In contrast to theoretical predictions, the relation of participative budgeting with organizational performance is heterogeneous and does not generalize across settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:48:y:2016:i:1:p:17-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838915000347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Erratum to "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research" [Accounting Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 169-249]," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 815-815.
    2. Brownell, Peter & Dunk, Alan S., 1991. "Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: Some methodological issues and empirical investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 693-703.
    3. Briers, Michael & Hirst, Mark, 1990. "The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 373-398.
    4. Otley, David & Pollanen, Raili M., 2000. "Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 483-496, May.
    5. Shields, Michael D. & Deng, F. Johnny & Kato, Yutaka, 2000. "The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct- and indirect-effects models," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 185-202, February.
    6. Mia, Lokman, 1989. "The impact of participation in budgeting and job difficulty on managerial performance and work motivation: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 347-357, July.
    7. Shannon W. Anderson & Henri C. Dekker & Karen L. Sedatole, 2010. "An Empirical Examination of Goals and Performance-to-Goal Following the Introduction of an Incentive Bonus Plan with Participative Goal Setting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 90-109, January.
    8. Nouri, H. & Parker, R. J., 1998. "The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 467-483.
    9. A.B. Bonache & J. Maurice, 2010. "A Best Evidence Synthesis On The Link Between Budgetary Participation And Managerial Performance," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 5(2(12)/Sum), pages 34-47.
    10. Brownell, P, 1985. "Budgetary Systems And The Control Of Functionally Differentiated Organizational Activities," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 502-512.
    11. Prabhu Sivabalan & Peter Booth & Teemu Malmi & David A. Brown, 2009. "An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 849-871, December.
    12. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    13. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Stoelwinder, Johannes U., 1995. "The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Rong-Ruey Duh & Hueiling Chen & Chee W. Chow, 2006. "Is Environmental Uncertainty an antecedent or moderating variable in the design of budgeting systems? An exploratory study," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 341-361.
    15. Davila, Tony & Wouters, Marc, 2005. "Managing budget emphasis through the explicit design of conditional budgetary slack," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 587-608.
    16. Lindsay, R. Murray, 1995. "Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 35-53, January.
    17. Lawrence D. Brown & Ronald J. Huefner, 1994. "The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 223-250, June.
    18. Roland T. Rust & Tuck Siong Chung, 2006. "Marketing Models of Service and Relationships," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 560-580, 11-12.
    19. Mia, Lokman, 1988. "Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 465-475, August.
    20. Klaus Derfuss, 2009. "The Relationship of Budgetary Participation and Reliance on Accounting Performance Measures with Individual-Level Consequent Variables: A Meta-Analysis," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 203-239.
    21. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    22. Swiering.Rj & Moncur, Rh, 1972. "Relationship Between Managers Budget-Oriented Behavior And Selected Attitude, Position, Size, And Performance Measures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10, pages 194-209.
    23. Dunk, Alan S., 1990. "Budgetary participation, agreement on evaluation criteria and managerial performance: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 171-178.
    24. Brownell, P & Hirst, M, 1986. "Reliance On Accounting Information, Budgetary Participation, And Task Uncertainty - Tests Of A 3-Way Interaction," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 241-249.
    25. Agbejule, Adebayo & Saarikoski, Lotta, 2006. "The effect of cost management knowledge on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 427-440.
    26. C. Chet Miller & Nathan T. Washburn & William H. Glick, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE—The Myth of Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 948-964, June.
    27. Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark & Chen, Clara Xiaoling, 2005. "Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 655-684.
    28. Steven E. Salterio, 2014. "We Don't Replicate Accounting Research—Or Do We?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1134-1142, December.
    29. Chong, Vincent K. & Eggleton, Ian R.C. & Leong, Michele K.C., 2005. "The impact of market competition and budgetary participation on performance and job satisfaction: a research note," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 115-133.
    30. Scott, Thomas W. & Tiessen, P., 1999. "Performance measurement and managerial teams," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 263-285, April.
    31. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B. & Williamson, Michael G. & Upton, David R., 2008. "The effort and risk-taking effects of budget-based contracts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 436-452.
    32. Kirby, Aj & Reichelstein, S & Sen, Pk & Paik, Ty, 1991. "Participation, Slack, And Budget-Based Performance Evaluation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 109-128.
    33. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    34. David C. Hay & W. Robert Knechel & Norman Wong, 2006. "Audit Fees: A Meta†analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 141-191, March.
    35. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe, 2008. "Evidence and Implications of Multiple Paradigms in Accounting Knowledge Production," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 161-191.
    36. Williams, John J. & Macintosh, Norman B. & Moore, John C., 1990. "Budget-related behavior in public sector organizations: Some empirical evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 221-246.
    37. Parker, Robert J. & Kyj, Larissa, 2006. "Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-45, January.
    38. Stephan Kramer & Frank Hartmann, 2014. "How Top-down and Bottom-up Budgeting Affect Budget Slack and Performance through Social and Economic Exchange," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(3), pages 314-340, September.
    39. Lili‐Anne Kihn, 2010. "Performance outcomes in empirical management accounting research," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 468-492, June.
    40. Shields, J. F. & Shields, M. D., 1998. "Antecedents of participative budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-76, January.
    41. Moers, Frank, 2005. "Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: the impact of diversity and subjectivity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-80, January.
    42. Brownell, P, 1982. "The Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation, Budgetary Participation, And Organizational-Effectiveness," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 12-27.
    43. Lau, Chong M. & Low, Liang C. & Eggleton, Ian R. C., 1995. "The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 359-381, July.
    44. Robert H. Chenhall & Frank Moers, 2007. "The Issue of Endogeneity within Theory-Based, Quantitative Management Accounting Research," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 173-196.
    45. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1984. "Influences on departmental budgeting: an empirical examination of a contingency model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 291-307, October.
    46. Teemu Malmi & Markus Granlund, 2009. "In Search of Management Accounting Theory," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 597-620.
    47. Klaus Derfuss, 2015. "Relating Context Variables to Participative Budgeting and Evaluative Use of Performance Measures: A Meta-analysis," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 238-278, June.
    48. Hassel, Lars G. & Cunningham, Gary M., 1993. "Budget effectiveness in multinational companies: An empirical examination of environmental interaction on cognitive and affective effects of two dimensions of budgetary participation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 299-318, December.
    49. Dunk, Alan S., 1995. "The joint effect of participative budgeting and managerial interest in innovation on departmental performance," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 75-85, March.
    50. Macinati, Manuela S. & Rizzo, Marco G., 2014. "Budget goal commitment, clinical managers’ use of budget information and performance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 228-238.
    51. Bouwens, Jan & Abernethy, Margaret A., 2000. "The consequences of customization on management accounting system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 221-241, April.
    52. Lau, Chong M. & Roopnarain, Ketvi, 2014. "The effects of nonfinancial and financial measures on employee motivation to participate in target setting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 228-247.
    53. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    54. Byrne, Suzanne & Damon, Fiona, 2008. "To participate or not to participate? Voice and explanation effects on performance in a multi-period budget setting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 207-227.
    55. Dunk, Alan S., 1993. "The effects of job-related tension on managerial performance in participative budgetary settings," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 575-585.
    56. Brownell, P & Merchant, Ka, 1990. "The Budgetary And Performance Influences Of Product Standardization And Manufacturing Process Automation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 388-397.
    57. Dunk, Alan S., 1989. "Budget emphasis, budgetary participation and managerial performance: A note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 321-324, July.
    58. Chenhall, Robert H. & Brownell, Peter, 1988. "The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance: Role ambiguity as an intervening variable," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 225-233, April.
    59. Brownell, Peter, 1983. "Leadership style, budgetary participation and managerial behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 307-321, October.
    60. Jarrar, Nazmi Saeb & Smith, Malcolm, 2014. "Innovation in entrepreneurial organisations: A platform for contemporary management change and a value creator," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 60-76.
    61. Jermias, Johnny & Setiawan, Trisnawati, 2008. "The moderating effects of hierarchy and control systems on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 268-292, September.
    62. Chow, Chee W. & Shields, Michael D. & Wu, Anne, 1999. "The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(5-6), pages 441-461, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vinícius Costa da Silva Zonatto & Juliana Constâncio Nascimento & Micheli Aparecida Lunardi & Larissa Degenhart, 2020. "Effects of Budgetary Participation on Managerial Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Managerial Performance," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(6), pages 532-549.
    2. Khalid Hasan Al Jasimee & Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda, 2023. "A SEM-NCA approach towards the impact of participative budgeting on budgetary slack and managerial performance: The mediating role of leadership style and leader-member exchange," Papers 2310.09993, arXiv.org.
    3. Domenico Raucci & Manuela Paolini, 2021. "Soddisfazione lavorativa e work engagement nelle budgeting practices delle aziende sanitarie pubbliche. Una verifica empirica," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(1), pages 13-32.
    4. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    5. Tim M. Lindquist & Alexandra Rausch, 2021. "The impact of procedural and distributive justice on satisfaction and manufacturing performance: a replication of Lindquist (1995) with a focus on the importance of common metrics in experimental desi," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 161-195, June.
    6. P. Maik Hamann, 2017. "Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 227-289, August.
    7. Latorre, Felisa & Ramos, José & Gracia, Francisco J. & Tomás, Inés, 2020. "How high-commitment HRM relates to PC violation and outcomes: The mediating role of supervisor support and PC fulfilment at individual and organizational levels," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 462-476.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Derfuss, 2015. "Relating Context Variables to Participative Budgeting and Evaluative Use of Performance Measures: A Meta-analysis," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 238-278, June.
    2. Adrien Bonache & Jonathan Maurice & Karen Moris & Irène Georgescu, 2009. "Enseignements d'une meta-analyse sur le lien participation budgétaire - performance managériale," Post-Print halshs-00460130, HAL.
    3. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    4. Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark & Chen, Clara Xiaoling, 2005. "Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 655-684.
    5. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    6. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    7. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    8. Adam Maiga & Anders Nilsson & Fred Jacobs, 2014. "Assessing the impact of budgetary participation on budgetary outcomes: the role of information technology for enhanced communication and activity-based costing," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-32, September.
    9. Shields, J. F. & Shields, M. D., 1998. "Antecedents of participative budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-76, January.
    10. Pascal Langevin & Gérald Naro, 2003. "Controle Et Comportements : Une Revue De La Litterature Anglo-Saxonne," Post-Print halshs-00582794, HAL.
    11. Chong, Vincent K. & Eggleton, Ian R.C. & Leong, Michele K.C., 2005. "The impact of market competition and budgetary participation on performance and job satisfaction: a research note," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 115-133.
    12. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    13. Manuela Macinati & Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2018. "Il ruolo di moderazione dell?identit? professionale medica nella relazione tra partecipazione al processo di budget e performance dei medici responsabili di struttura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(106), pages 11-36.
    14. Christian Daumoser & Bernhard Hirsch & Matthias Sohn, 2018. "Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 115-159, August.
    15. Marginson, David & Ogden, Stuart, 2005. "Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviours," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 435-456, July.
    16. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    17. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    18. Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2014. "La relazione tra il livello di coinvolgimento nel processo di budget, il commitment verso gli obiettivi, la soddisfazione lavorativa e i relativi risvolti sulla performance manageriale. I risultati di," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 9-34.
    19. Mu-Jung Huang & Kuo-Chih Cheng & Shao-Hsi Chung & Huo-Ming Wang & Kuo-Hua Wang, 2021. "Budget Participation Capacity Configuration (BPCC), Budgeting Participation Requirement and Product Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    20. Arnold, Markus C. & Artz, Martin, 2015. "Target difficulty, target flexibility, and firm performance: Evidence from business units’ targets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 61-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:48:y:2016:i:1:p:17-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.