IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v18y2015i9p1130-1144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of hydrocarbon leaks and verification as an operational barrier

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Erik Vinnem

Abstract

Prevention of hydrocarbon (HC) leaks is important; they are the most critical precursor events that may lead to major accidents, such as the Piper Alpha catastrophe in 1988. The number of HC leaks on offshore production installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf peaked just after year 2000, with more than 40 leaks per year with initial rate above 0.1 kg/s. The Norwegian Oil and Gas Association carried out a reduction project from 2003 until 2007, which resulted in 10 HC leaks above 0.1 kg/s in 2007. The number of leaks increased in the years after 2007 and was on average 15 in the period 2008-2010, without any significant increase in the number of installations. A new initiative was launched early in 2011 in order to reduce the number of HC leaks further. A study performed by the project concludes that more than 50% of the leaks are associated with failure of operational barriers during manual intervention into the process systems. Human and organisational factors are dominating with respect to circumstances and root causes. The study has further demonstrated the high importance of verification as an operational barrier and has shown that many of the failures do not have multiple operational barriers in the form of several verifications and a leak test at the end. This finding is crucial in order to understand the criticality of performing the planned verifications, perform them in an independent manner according to the procedures and make sure that the focus is on detecting failures during the verification. This paper presents the analysis of HC leaks, with emphasis on operational barriers and importance of verification.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Erik Vinnem, 2015. "Analysis of hydrocarbon leaks and verification as an operational barrier," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1130-1144, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:9:p:1130-1144
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.913661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.913661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.913661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinnem, Jan Erik & Aven, Terje & Husebø, Torleif & Seljelid, Jorunn & Tveit, Odd J., 2006. "Major hazard risk indicators for monitoring of trends in the Norwegian offshore petroleum sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(7), pages 778-791.
    2. Vinnem, Jan Erik & Hestad, Jon Andreas & Kvaløy, Jan Terje & Skogdalen, Jon Espen, 2010. "Analysis of root causes of major hazard precursors (hydrocarbon leaks) in the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1142-1153.
    3. Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2013. "On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 112-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstandinidou, Myrto & Nivolianitou, Zoe & Kefalogianni, Eirini & Caroni, Chrys, 2011. "In-depth analysis of the causal factors of incidents reported in the Greek petrochemical industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1448-1455.
    2. Bhardwaj, U. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C. & Ariffin, A.K. & Singh, S.S., 2021. "Evidence based risk analysis of fire and explosion accident scenarios in FPSOs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Jan-Erik Vinnem, 2013. "Use of accident precursor event investigations in the understanding of major hazard risk potential in the Norwegian offshore industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(1), pages 66-79, February.
    4. Saleh, Joseph H. & Saltmarsh, Elizabeth A. & Favarò, Francesca M. & Brevault, Loïc, 2013. "Accident precursors, near misses, and warning signs: Critical review and formal definitions within the framework of Discrete Event Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 148-154.
    5. J E Vinnem & J Seljelid & S Haugen & S Sklet & T Aven, 2009. "Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(1), pages 87-97, March.
    6. Qian, Fubin & Strusevich, Vitaly & Gribkovskaia, Irina & Halskau, Øyvind, 2015. "Minimization of passenger takeoff and landing risk in offshore helicopter transportation: Models, approaches and analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 93-106.
    7. Sørskår, Leif Inge K. & Selvik, Jon T. & Abrahamsen, Eirik B., 2019. "On the use of the vision zero principle and the ALARP principle for production loss in the oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Novak, Jeremy & Farr-Wharton, Ben & Brunetto, Yvonne & Shacklock, Kate & Brown, Kerry, 2017. "Safety outcomes for engineering asset management organizations: Old problem with new solutions?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 67-73.
    9. Alsulieman, Abdullah & Ge, Xihe & Zeng, Zhiguo & Butenko, Sergiy & Khan, Faisal & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud, 2024. "Dynamic risk analysis of evolving scenarios in oil and gas separator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Carmen Carnero, María & José Pedregal, Diego, 2010. "Modelling and forecasting occupational accidents of different severity levels in Spain," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1134-1141.
    11. Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & Paltrinieri, Nicola, 2014. "On the application of near accident data to risk analysis of major accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 116-125.
    12. Haavik, Torgeir Kolstø, 2021. "Debates and politics in safety science," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Milch, Vibeke & Laumann, Karin, 2019. "The influence of interorganizational factors on offshore incidents in the Norwegian petroleum industry: Challenges and future directions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 84-96.
    14. Qian, Fubin & Gribkovskaia, Irina & Laporte, Gilbert & Halskau sr., Øyvind, 2012. "Passenger and pilot risk minimization in offshore helicopter transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 584-593.
    15. Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2013. "On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 112-121.
    16. Vinnem, Jan Erik & Hestad, Jon Andreas & Kvaløy, Jan Terje & Skogdalen, Jon Espen, 2010. "Analysis of root causes of major hazard precursors (hydrocarbon leaks) in the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1142-1153.
    17. Khorsandi, Jahon & Aven, Terje, 2017. "Incorporating assumption deviation risk in quantitative risk assessments: A semi-quantitative approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 22-32.
    18. Skogdalen, Jon Espen & Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2012. "Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 48-58.
    19. Acheampong, Theophilus & Phimister, Euan & Kemp, Alexander, 2021. "What difference has the Cullen Report made? Empirical analysis of offshore safety regulations in the United Kingdom's oil and gas industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Brachner, Markus & Hvattum, Lars Magnus, 2017. "Combined emergency preparedness and operations for safe personnel transport to offshore locations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 31-41.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:9:p:1130-1144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.