IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v191y2019ics0951832017311407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of the vision zero principle and the ALARP principle for production loss in the oil and gas industry

Author

Listed:
  • SørskÃ¥r, Leif Inge K.
  • Selvik, Jon T.
  • Abrahamsen, Eirik B.

Abstract

In the oil and gas industry, there is a strong focus on reducing production loss, and in the last decade the industry has adopted Vision Zero as a governing principle, to meet this goal. A previous paper has concluded that, although the vision is acceptable, in several ways, as a rational goal in this context, it does not sufficiently recognize the relevance of other concerns in risk management decision-making. Another principle in risk management that has a strong focus on reducing risk is the “As Low As Reasonably Practicable†(ALARP) principle. When applying this principle, it is possible to consider different concerns, such as costs and HSE issues, thus providing an advantageous way to complement Vision Zero in practical implementation. We discuss and find that an extended principle, consisting of both the Vision Zero principle and the ALARP principle, meets the criteria for constituting a rational goal. Conclusively, we recommend complementing Vision Zero with the ALARP principle for managing the risk of production loss.

Suggested Citation

  • SørskÃ¥r, Leif Inge K. & Selvik, Jon T. & Abrahamsen, Eirik B., 2019. "On the use of the vision zero principle and the ALARP principle for production loss in the oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:191:y:2019:i:c:s0951832017311407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017311407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosencrantz, Holger & Edvardsson, Karin & Hansson, Sven Ove, 2007. "Vision Zero - Is it irrational?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 559-567, July.
    2. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2018. "Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 160-165.
    3. Aven, T. & Vinnem, J.E. & Wiencke, H.S., 2007. "A decision framework for risk management, with application to the offshore oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 433-448.
    4. Karin Edvardsson & Sven Hansson, 2005. "When is a goal rational?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 24(2), pages 343-361, April.
    5. Hjorteland, A. & Aven, T. & Østebø, R., 2007. "Uncertainty treatment in production assurance analyses throughout the various phases of a project," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1315-1320.
    6. Vinnem, Jan Erik & Hestad, Jon Andreas & Kvaløy, Jan Terje & Skogdalen, Jon Espen, 2010. "Analysis of root causes of major hazard precursors (hydrocarbon leaks) in the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1142-1153.
    7. Aven, T. & Flage, R., 2009. "Use of decision criteria based on expected values to support decision-making in a production assurance and safety setting," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(9), pages 1491-1498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Victoria Smirniakova & Valerii Smirniakov & Yana Almosova & Alena Kargopolova, 2021. "“Vision Zero” Concept as a Tool for the Effective Occupational Safety Management System Formation in JSC “SUEK-Kuzbass”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    2. Langdalen, Henrik & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2020. "On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin, 2013. "Rational climate mitigation goals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 285-292.
    4. Henok Girma Abebe, 2022. "Road Safety Policy in Addis Ababa: A Vision Zero Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Gholamreza Dehdasht & Rosli Mohamad Zin & M. Salim Ferwati & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Ali Keyvanfar & Ronald McCaffer, 2017. "DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Wang, Tai-Ran & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Identification of protective actions to reduce the vulnerability of safety-critical systems to malevolent acts: A sensitivity-based decision-making approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 9-18.
    7. T. R. Wang & N. Pedroni & E. Zio & V. Mousseau, 2020. "Identification of Protective Actions to Reduce the Vulnerability of Safety‐Critical Systems to Malevolent Intentional Acts: An Optimization‐Based Decision‐Making Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 565-587, March.
    8. Mocellin, Paolo & Pilenghi, Lisa, 2023. "Semi-quantitative approach to prioritize risk in industrial chemical plants aggregating safety, economics and ageing: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Langdalen, Henrik & Dahl, Roy Endre & Bansal, Surbhi & Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim, 2021. "On the use of the ‘Return Of Safety Investments’ (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon T. & Asche, Frank & Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim, 2020. "Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Novak, Jeremy & Farr-Wharton, Ben & Brunetto, Yvonne & Shacklock, Kate & Brown, Kerry, 2017. "Safety outcomes for engineering asset management organizations: Old problem with new solutions?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 67-73.
    12. Chen, Yinuo & Xie, Shuyi & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "Risk assessment of buried gas pipelines based on improved cloud-variable weight theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Jan Erik Vinnem, 2015. "Analysis of hydrocarbon leaks and verification as an operational barrier," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1130-1144, October.
    14. Hausken, Kjell, 2021. "The precautionary principle as multi-period games where players have different thresholds for acceptable uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. Simo Salminen & Donghyun Seo, 2015. "Future of Occupational Injuries," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(6), pages 341-354, June.
    16. Jieyin Lyu & Shouqin Zhou & Jingang Liu & Bingchun Jiang, 2023. "Intelligent-Technology-Empowered Active Emergency Command Strategy for Urban Hazardous Chemical Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Ali N Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi & Yonas Z Ayele, 2018. "Production performance analysis during operation phase: A case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 559-575, December.
    18. Patrik Baard, 2016. "Risk-reducing goals: ideals and abilities when managing complex environmental risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 164-180, February.
    19. Wang, Tai-Ran & Mousseau, Vincent & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "An empirical classification-based framework for the safety criticality assessment of energy production systems, in presence of inconsistent data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 139-151.
    20. Junrui Xu & James H. Lambert, 2015. "Risk‐Cost‐Benefit Analysis for Transportation Corridors with Interval Uncertainties of Heterogeneous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 624-641, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:191:y:2019:i:c:s0951832017311407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.