IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v20y2002i7p569-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of architectural consultants

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Cheung
  • Judy Leung Fung Kuen
  • Martin Skitmore

Abstract

The selection of a competent architect is vital to the success of a development. Like in many developed countries, developers in Hong Kong select architects based on a set of criteria. Price is not the only consideration in the process, and decisions rely heavily on subjective judgement. By conducting a questionnaire survey, the research reported here identified the common criteria for selection and their relative importance for an objective selection. This involved the use of an evaluation method called the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Survey data from projects with similar characteristics were used to compute the criteria weights. Multi-criteria models for seven out of 27 categories of project were built with reference to the computed weights derived from the survey. In addition, a computer program, called the Architectural Consultant Selection System (ACSS), was designed to illustrate a logical approach for the evaluation of prospective consultant architects based on the models constructed.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Cheung & Judy Leung Fung Kuen & Martin Skitmore, 2002. "Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of architectural consultants," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 569-580.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:7:p:569-580
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190210159818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190210159818
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190210159818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Sik-Wah Fong & Sonia Kit-Yung Choi, 2000. "Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 547-557.
    2. Sai-On Cheung & Tsun-Ip Lam & Mei-Yung Leung & Yue-Wang Wan, 2001. "An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 427-437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J P Pastor-Ferrando & P Aragonés-Beltrán & A Hospitaler-Pérez & M García-Melón, 2010. "An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 905-916, June.
    2. Shwetank Avikal & Mukesh Nigam & Mangey Ram, 2022. "A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach for consultant selection problem in ERP project," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 941-950, June.
    3. Mehmedali Egemen, 2022. "Building Construction Clients’ Design Consultant and Contractor Selection Criteria Versus Post-Occupancy Satisfaction Levels," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sai-On Cheung & Henry Suen, 2002. "A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 557-568.
    2. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    3. Nan Zhao & Fei J Ying & John Tookey, 2022. "Construction Procurement Selection Criteria: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Junling Zhang & Xiaowen Qi & Changyong Liang, 2018. "Tackling Complexity in Green Contractor Selection for Mega Infrastructure Projects: A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic MADM Approach with considering Group Attitudinal Character and Attributes’ Interdependen," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-31, December.
    5. K. C. Lam & T. S. Hu & S. T. Ng, 2005. "Using the principal component analysis method as a tool in contractor pre-qualification," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 673-684.
    6. Stéphanie Boulenger & Marcelin Joanis, 2015. "Analyse économique des marchés publics dans l’industrie de la construction au Québec," CIRANO Project Reports 2015rp-23, CIRANO.
    7. Abeysekara, Baudhi & Perera, Piyaruwan & Chhipi Shrestha, Gyan Kumar & Gunaruwan, Lalithasiri & Kumarage, Amal & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Improving the capital deployment efficiency: An infrastructure investment planning process in transportation project," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Mousakhani Ehsan & Ranjbar Shirzad & Ashoori Taha, 2018. "Identification and evaluation of criteria for selecting contractors using a risk management approach," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1747-1760, July.
    9. Nadeera Abdul Razak & Obuks Ejohwomu & Peter Fenn & Kamil Okedara & Babatunde Dosumu & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, 2021. "Identification of Health and Safety Prequalification Criteria for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. S Taghipour & D Banjevic & A K S Jardine, 2011. "Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1666-1687, September.
    11. Martin Ekstrom & Hans Bjornsson & Clifford Nass, 2003. "Accounting for rater credibility when evaluating AEC subcontractors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 197-208.
    12. Junn-Yuan Teng & Wen-Chih Huang & Maw-Cherng Lin, 2010. "Systematic budget allocation for transportation construction projects: a case in Taiwan," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 331-361, March.
    13. Narasimhan, Ram & Talluri, Srinivas & Mahapatra, Santosh, 2008. "Effective response to RFQs and supplier development: A supplier's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 461-470, October.
    14. Odhigu Festus Onosakponome & Nazatul Shima Abdul Rani & Junaid M. Shaikh, 2011. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Procurement Systems and the Performance of Construction Projects in East Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 181-192.
    15. Amirhosein Jafari, 2013. "A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 746-760, July.
    16. J P Pastor-Ferrando & P Aragonés-Beltrán & A Hospitaler-Pérez & M García-Melón, 2010. "An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 905-916, June.
    17. Puying Li & Simon Huston, 2015. "International Competitiveness of ChinaÕs Construction Firms," ERES eres2015_67, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    18. Yi Zhang, 2020. "Construction of Bid Evaluation Index System in Government Public Project Green Procurement in China Based on D-S Evidence Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Ramesh Allipour Birgani & Amirhossein Takian & Abolghasem Djazayery & Ali Kianirad & Hamed Pouraram, 2022. "Climate Change and Food Security Prioritizing Indices: Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Social Network Analysis (SNA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Mimović Predrag & Krstić Ana, 2016. "Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Public Procurement Process Optimization," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 54(1), pages 103-128, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:7:p:569-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.