IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p651-d309371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of Bid Evaluation Index System in Government Public Project Green Procurement in China Based on D-S Evidence Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

Abstract

It is of great theoretical and practical significance to construct a bid evaluation index system characterized by green for government public project green procurement. With the combination of sustainable development theory and system theory, and with the goal of government public project procurement as the guide, this paper uses the documentary research method, questionnaire survey method, and expert consultation method to analyze the influential factors of bid evaluation for government public project procurement with the perspective of green development from the aspects of qualification, economy, technology, management, and public welfare and to construct the bid evaluation index system for government public project green procurement; based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, using the D-S evidence synthesis method to construct a comprehensive judgment matrix for group decision-making (which effectively solves the problem of synthesizing expert opinions), and combined with the analytic hierarchy process, the index weights are determined. Ultimately, a bid evaluation index system for government public project green procurement is obtained, including 5 first-level indexes, 18 secondary indexes, and 56 tertiary indexes, providing theoretical guidance for the government to implement green procurement in the field of public projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zhang, 2020. "Construction of Bid Evaluation Index System in Government Public Project Green Procurement in China Based on D-S Evidence Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:651-:d:309371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/651/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/651/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Sik-Wah Fong & Sonia Kit-Yung Choi, 2000. "Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 547-557.
    2. Zedan Hatush & Martin Skitmore, 1997. "Criteria for contractor selection," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 19-38.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L. & Vargas, Luis G., 1987. "Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 107-117, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiuguo Wu & Yibai Meng, 2022. "Evaluation and Selection of Cement Suppliers under the Background of New and Old Driving Energy Conversion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Ali Arsal & Tauha Hussain Ali, 2021. "Modeling the Factors Enhancing the Implementation of Green Procurement in the Pakistani Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Mohamed Mahmoud Fawzy & Ahmed Shawky Elsharkawy & Yasser Aly Khalifa & Abbas Atef hassan, 2024. "Contractor selection by using multi-criteria decision-making for Egyptian road maintenance," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2351-2365, June.
    4. Min-Yuan Cheng & Shu-Hua Yeh & Woei-Chyi Chang, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making of Contractor Selection in Mass Rapid Transit Station Development Using Bayesian Fuzzy Prospect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Dorota Kuchta & Ewa Marchwicka & Jan Schneider, 2021. "Sustainability-Oriented Project Scheduling Based on Z-Fuzzy Numbers for Public Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Rogério Moreno Perlingeiro & Mayra Soares Pereira Lima Perlingeiro & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2021. "Criteria for the assessment of sustainability of public constructions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15450-15493, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadeera Abdul Razak & Obuks Ejohwomu & Peter Fenn & Kamil Okedara & Babatunde Dosumu & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, 2021. "Identification of Health and Safety Prequalification Criteria for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Amirhosein Jafari, 2013. "A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 746-760, July.
    3. J P Pastor-Ferrando & P Aragonés-Beltrán & A Hospitaler-Pérez & M García-Melón, 2010. "An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 905-916, June.
    4. Aziz Naghizadeh Vardin & Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Romualdas Bausys, 2021. "An Integrated Decision Support Model Based on BWM and Fuzzy-VIKOR Techniques for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Murali Jagannathan & Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi, 2020. "Perceptions of Stakeholders on the ‘Redraftability’ of Construction Contracts," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(2), pages 152-161, July.
    6. Mohammed A. Al-Ghamdi & Khalid S. Al-Gahtani, 2022. "Integrated Value Engineering and Life Cycle Cost Modeling for HVAC System Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Andove Wilson Mwangu & Mike Amuhaya Iravo, 2015. "How Monitoring and Evaluation Affects the Outcome of Constituency Development Fund Projects in Kenya: A Case Study of Projects in Gatanga Constituency," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 13-31, March.
    8. Maciej Nowak, 2010. "Interactive Multicriteria Decision Aiding Under Risk—Methods and Applications," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 69-91, October.
    9. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    10. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    11. Ji-Hee Lee & Woo-Young Chun & Jun-Ho Choi, 2021. "Weighting the Attributes of Human-Related Activities for Fire Safety Measures in Historic Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Abdul Rahman & Yazan Alzubi, 2015. "Exploring Key Contractor Factors Influencing Client Satisfaction Level in Dealing with Construction Project: an Empirical Study in Jordan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(12), pages 109-126, December.
    13. Zeshui Xu, 2013. "Compatibility Analysis of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 463-482, May.
    14. Levary, Reuven R. & Wan, Ke, 1999. "An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 661-677, December.
    15. Stefanos Dosis & George P. Petropoulos & Kleomenis Kalogeropoulos, 2023. "A Geospatial Approach to Identify and Evaluate Ecological Restoration Sites in Post-Fire Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Zaras, Kazimierz, 2001. "Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 305-314, April.
    17. Kapote Mangesh & Patil Pratik & Pimplikar Sunil, 2023. "Effective pre-qualification systems – Are they essential for minimising delays on road projects?," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 213-220, January.
    18. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    19. Junling Zhang & Xiaowen Qi & Changyong Liang, 2018. "Tackling Complexity in Green Contractor Selection for Mega Infrastructure Projects: A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic MADM Approach with considering Group Attitudinal Character and Attributes’ Interdependen," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-31, December.
    20. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2016. "Hesitant analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 602-614.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:651-:d:309371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.