IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v34y2020i9d10.1007_s11269-020-02587-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure-Pipe Breaks Relationship in Water Distribution Networks: A Statistical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Iman Moslehi

    (Shahid Beheshti University)

  • Mohammadreza Jalili_Ghazizadeh

    (Shahid Beheshti University)

Abstract

Maximum pressure is a crucial factor in pipe break events. In this paper, a field data-based methodology is proposed to statistically investigate the relationship between operating pressures and pipe break rates in water distribution networks. The objective is to develop the pipe break rate functions (BRFs) where a maximum pressure indicator (MPI) is associated with an average level of pipe break rates. The methodology uses measured pressure values at the average zone point to calculate MPIs along with recorded pipe breaks to establish BRFs for different pipe materials. The Bayes theorem is then applied to identify the maximum pressure thresholds on the BRFs by means of the unconditional and break- conditioned cumulative distribution functions of the MPIs. The methodology is applied to a large zone of the water distribution network of Tehran (Iran). The results showed that the annual average of the MPI is the best indicator to develop BRFs. The obtained pressure thresholds confirm that the break rates increase rapidly for specific maximum pressure ranges, which can be used to implement effective pressure management.

Suggested Citation

  • Iman Moslehi & Mohammadreza Jalili_Ghazizadeh, 2020. "Pressure-Pipe Breaks Relationship in Water Distribution Networks: A Statistical Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 2851-2868, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02587-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02587-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02587-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-020-02587-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Francisque, Alex & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 220-234.
    2. Xu, Qiang & Chen, Qiuwen & Li, Weifeng & Ma, Jinfeng, 2011. "Pipe break prediction based on evolutionary data-driven methods with brief recorded data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 942-948.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jara-Arriagada, Carlos & Stoianov, Ivan, 2021. "Pipe breaks and estimating the impact of pressure control in water supply networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Amira Rjaibi & Sophie Duchesne, 2024. "Impact of Pressure on the Deterioration of Drinking Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(12), pages 4867-4882, September.
    3. Ram Kailash Prasad, 2021. "Identification of Critical Pipes for Water Distribution Network Rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5187-5204, December.
    4. Yaser Amiri-Ardakani & Mohammad Najafzadeh, 2021. "Pipe Break Rate Assessment While Considering Physical and Operational Factors: A Methodology based on Global Positioning System and Data-Driven Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3703-3720, September.
    5. Moslehi, Iman & Jalili Ghazizadeh, Mohammadreza & Yousefi-Khoshqalb, Ehsan, 2020. "An economic valuation model for alternative pressure management schemes in water distribution networks," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robles-Velasco, Alicia & Cortés, Pablo & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Onieva, Luis, 2020. "Prediction of pipe failures in water supply networks using logistic regression and support vector classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. De Iuliis, Melissa & Kammouh, Omar & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2021. "Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Mrinal Kanti Sen & Subhrajit Dutta & Golam Kabir, 2021. "Flood Resilience of Housing Infrastructure Modeling and Quantification Using a Bayesian Belief Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Kammouh, Omar & Gardoni, Paolo & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo, 2020. "Probabilistic framework to evaluate the resilience of engineering systems using Bayesian and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Dawid Szpak, 2020. "Method for Determining the Probability of a Lack of Water Supply to Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Ramos-Salgado, Cristóbal & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Aparicio-Ruiz, Pablo & Onieva, Luis, 2022. "A comprehensive framework to efficiently plan short and long-term investments in water supply and sewer networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Predicting water main failures using Bayesian model averaging and survival modelling approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 498-514.
    8. Kabir, Golam & Balek, Ngandu Balekelayi Celestin & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2018. "Consequence-based framework for buried infrastructure systems: A Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 290-301.
    9. Jara-Arriagada, Carlos & Stoianov, Ivan, 2021. "Pipe breaks and estimating the impact of pressure control in water supply networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Gema Sakti Raspati & Stian Bruaset & Camillo Bosco & Lars Mushom & Birgitte Johannessen & Rita Ugarelli, 2022. "A Risk-Based Approach in Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Deng, Yong, 2016. "Deng entropy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 549-553.
    12. Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Aslani, Babak & Mohebbi, Shima, 2022. "Predictive resilience of interdependent water and transportation infrastructures: A sociotechnical approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Vafadarnikjoo, Amin & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos & Botelho, Tiago & Bamford, David, 2023. "A stratified decision-making model for long-term planning: Application in flood risk management in Scotland," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Albara M. Mustafa & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "Resilience Assessment of Wind Farms in the Arctic with the Application of Bayesian Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Jiansong Wu & Zhuqiang Hu & Jinyue Chen & Zheng Li, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2019. "Portfolio optimization of safety measures for the prevention of time-dependent accident scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Quintanar-Gago, David A. & Nelson, Pamela F. & Díaz-Sánchez, à ngeles & Boldrick, Michael S., 2021. "Assessment of steam turbine blade failure and damage mechanisms using a Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    18. Lina Han & Qing Ma & Feng Zhang & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yongbin Bao & Jing Zhao, 2019. "Risk Assessment of An Earthquake-Collapse-Landslide Disaster Chain by Bayesian Network and Newmark Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Bai, Xiwen & Cheng, Liangqi & Iris, Çağatay, 2022. "Data-driven financial and operational risk management: Empirical evidence from the global tramp shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Zhang, Mingming & Zhou, Simei & Wang, Qunwei & Liu, Liyun & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Will the carbon neutrality target impact China's energy security? A dynamic Bayesian network model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02587-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.