IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3330-d265801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of An Earthquake-Collapse-Landslide Disaster Chain by Bayesian Network and Newmark Models

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Han

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Qing Ma

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Feng Zhang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Yichen Zhang

    (Jilin Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring, Changchun 130061, China)

  • Jiquan Zhang

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Yongbin Bao

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Jing Zhao

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Severe natural disasters and related secondary disasters are a huge menace to society. Currently, it is difficult to identify risk formation mechanisms and quantitatively evaluate the risks associated with disaster chains; thus, there is a need to further develop relevant risk assessment methods. In this research, we propose an earthquake disaster chain risk evaluation method that couples Bayesian network and Newmark models that are based on natural hazard risk formation theory with the aim of identifying the influence of earthquake disaster chains. This new method effectively considers two risk elements: hazard and vulnerability, and hazard analysis, which includes chain probability analysis and hazard intensity analysis. The chain probability of adjacent disasters was obtained from the Bayesian network model, and the permanent displacement that was applied to represent the potential hazard intensity was calculated by the Newmark model. To validate the method, the Changbai Mountain volcano earthquake–collapse–landslide disaster chain was selected as a case study. The risk assessment results showed that the high-and medium-risk zones were predominantly located within a 10 km radius of Tianchi, and that other regions within the study area were mainly associated with very low-to low-risk values. The verified results of the reported method showed that the area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.817, which indicates that the method is very effective for earthquake disaster chain risk recognition and assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Han & Qing Ma & Feng Zhang & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yongbin Bao & Jing Zhao, 2019. "Risk Assessment of An Earthquake-Collapse-Landslide Disaster Chain by Bayesian Network and Newmark Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3330-:d:265801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng Tang & Yijia Li & Xiaofeng Hu & Huanggang Wu, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Urban Dirty Bomb Attacking Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. V. Del Gaudio & P. Pierri & G. Calcagnile, 2012. "Analysis of seismic hazard in landslide-prone regions: criteria and example for an area of Daunia (southern Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 203-215, March.
    3. Jiansong Wu & Zhuqiang Hu & Jinyue Chen & Zheng Li, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Francisque, Alex & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 220-234.
    5. Adnan Ozdemir, 2011. "Landslide susceptibility mapping using Bayesian approach in the Sultan Mountains (Akşehir, Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(3), pages 1573-1607, December.
    6. Mauro Niño & Miguel Jaimes & Eduardo Reinoso, 2014. "Seismic-event-based methodology to obtain earthquake-induced translational landslide regional hazard maps," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1697-1713, September.
    7. Chongfu Huang & Da Ruan, 2008. "Fuzzy Risks and an Updating Algorithm with New Observations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 681-694, June.
    8. Tsu-Chiang Lei & Yi-Min Huang & Bing-Jean Lee & Meng-Hsun Hsieh & Kuan-Ting Lin, 2014. "Development of an empirical model for rainfall-induced hillside vulnerability assessment: a case study on Chen-Yu-Lan watershed, Nantou, Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 341-373, November.
    9. Uusitalo, Laura, 2007. "Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 312-318.
    10. Wenhao Shen & Qiu Zhong & Baoping Shi, 2014. "Synthetic seismic intensity for historic earthquakes in the North China Plain: implications for the regional seismic hazard," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 305-323, November.
    11. Hai-Min Lyu & Jack Shuilong Shen & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Assessment of Geohazards and Preventative Countermeasures Using AHP Incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Zhi-hua Yang & Heng-xing Lan & Xing Gao & Lang-ping Li & Yun-shan Meng & Yu-ming Wu, 2015. "Urgent landslide susceptibility assessment in the 2013 Lushan earthquake-impacted area, Sichuan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2467-2487, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao Zhang & Xiaofeng Hu & Yiping Bai & Jiansong Wu, 2020. "Risk Assessment of Gas Leakage from School Laboratories Based on the Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Kai Ke & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Chenyang Wu & Zuoquan Nie & Junnan Wu, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Earthquake–Landslide Hazard Chain Based on CF-SVM and Newmark Model—Using Changbai Mountain as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Yunmeng Lu & Tiantian Wang & Tiezhong Liu, 2020. "Bayesian Network-Based Risk Analysis of Chemical Plant Explosion Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Jun Zhang & Haifeng Bian & Huanhuan Zhao & Xuexue Wang & Linlin Zhang & Yiping Bai, 2020. "Bayesian Network-Based Risk Assessment of Single-Phase Grounding Accidents of Power Transmission Lines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Yutao Li & Chuanguo Jia & Hong Chen & Hongchen Su & Jiahao Chen & Duoduo Wang, 2023. "Machine Learning Assessment of Damage Grade for Post-Earthquake Buildings: A Three-Stage Approach Directly Handling Categorical Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Ke & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Chenyang Wu & Zuoquan Nie & Junnan Wu, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Earthquake–Landslide Hazard Chain Based on CF-SVM and Newmark Model—Using Changbai Mountain as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. De Iuliis, Melissa & Kammouh, Omar & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2021. "Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Jiwen An & Xianfu Bai & Jinghai Xu & Gaozhong Nie & Xiuying Wang, 2015. "Prediction of highway blockage caused by earthquake-induced landslides for improving earthquake emergency response," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 511-536, October.
    4. Rongchen Zhu & Xin Li & Xiaofeng Hu & Deshui Hu, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Chemical Plant Explosion Accidents Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Zhang, Mingming & Zhou, Simei & Wang, Qunwei & Liu, Liyun & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Will the carbon neutrality target impact China's energy security? A dynamic Bayesian network model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Xiao Zhang & Xiaofeng Hu & Yiping Bai & Jiansong Wu, 2020. "Risk Assessment of Gas Leakage from School Laboratories Based on the Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Xi-Cun He & Tian-Liang Yang & Shui-Long Shen & Ye-Shuang Xu & Arul Arulrajah, 2019. "Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Di Zhang & Xinping Yan & Zaili Yang & Jin Wang, 2014. "An accident data–based approach for congestion risk assessment of inland waterways: A Yangtze River case," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 176-188, April.
    9. Hai-Min Lyu & Ye-Shuang Xu & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Flooding Hazards across Southern China and Prospective Sustainability Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Zhang, Quanzhong & Wei, Haiyan & Liu, Jing & Zhao, Zefang & Ran, Qiao & Gu, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian network with fuzzy mathematics for species habitat suitability analysis: A case with limited Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    11. Jim Lewis & Kerrie Mengersen & Laurie Buys & Desley Vine & John Bell & Peter Morris & Gerard Ledwich, 2015. "Systems Modelling of the Socio-Technical Aspects of Residential Electricity Use and Network Peak Demand," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Nicholson, Ann E. & Flores, M. Julia, 2011. "Combining state and transition models with dynamic Bayesian networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 555-566.
    13. Moe, S. Jannicke & Haande, Sigrid & Couture, Raoul-Marie, 2016. "Climate change, cyanobacteria blooms and ecological status of lakes: A Bayesian network approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 330-347.
    14. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    15. Mostafa Shaaban & Carmen Schwartz & Joseph Macpherson & Annette Piorr, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Framework for Mapping, Analyzing and Managing Supply–Demand Mismatches of Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Dayong Li & Zengchuan Dong & Liyao Shi & Jintao Liu & Zhenye Zhu & Wei Xu, 2019. "Risk Probability Assessment of Sudden Water Pollution in the Plain River Network Based on Random Discharge from Multiple Risk Sources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4051-4065, September.
    17. M. C. Marulanda & J. C. Llera & G. A. Bernal & O. D. Cardona, 2021. "Epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic estimates of seismic risk resulting from multiple hazard models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3203-3227, September.
    18. Tiller, Rachel Gjelsvik & Hansen, Lillian & Richards, Russell & Strand, Hillevi, 2015. "Work segmentation in the Norwegian salmon industry: The application of segmented labor market theory to work migrants on the island community of Frøya, Norway," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 563-572.
    19. Leonel Lara-Estrada & Livia Rasche & L. Enrique Sucar & Uwe A. Schneider, 2018. "Inferring Missing Climate Data for Agricultural Planning Using Bayesian Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3330-:d:265801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.