IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1594-d738813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk-Based Approach in Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Gema Sakti Raspati

    (Group Water and Environment, SINTEF Community, S.P. Andersens vei 3, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Stian Bruaset

    (Group Water and Environment, SINTEF Community, S.P. Andersens vei 3, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Camillo Bosco

    (Group Water and Environment, SINTEF Community, S.P. Andersens vei 3, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Lars Mushom

    (Group Mathematics and Cybernetics, SINTEF Digital, Forskningsveien 1, N-0373 Oslo, Norway)

  • Birgitte Johannessen

    (Trondheim Municipality, Erling Skakkes Gate 14, N-7013 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Rita Ugarelli

    (Group Water and Environment, SINTEF Community, S.P. Andersens vei 3, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), S.P. Andersens vei 5, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

A risk-based approach to support water utilities in terms of defining pipe rehabilitation priorities is presented. In a risk analysis in the risk management process, the probability that a given event will happen and the consequences if it does happen have to be estimated and combined. In the quantitative risk analysis, numerical values are assigned to both consequence and probability. In this study, the risk event addressed was the inability to supply water due to pipe breaks. Therefore, on the probability side, the probability of pipes breaking was assessed, and on the consequence side, the reduced ability to satisfy the water demand (hydraulic reliability) due to pipe breakage was computed. Random Forest analysis was implemented for the probability side, while the Asset Vulnerability Analysis Toolkit was used to analyse the network’s hydraulic reliability. Pipes could then be ranked based on the corresponding risk magnitude, thereby feeding a risk evaluation step; at this step, decisions are made concerning which risks need treatment, and also concerning the treatment priorities, i.e., rehabilitation priorities. The water distribution network of Trondheim, Norway, was used as a case study area, and this study illustrates how the developed method aids the development of a risk-based rehabilitation plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Gema Sakti Raspati & Stian Bruaset & Camillo Bosco & Lars Mushom & Birgitte Johannessen & Rita Ugarelli, 2022. "A Risk-Based Approach in Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1594-:d:738813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Francisque, Alex & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 220-234.
    2. Eric D. Smith & William T. Siefert & David Drain, 2009. "Risk matrix input data biases," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 344-360, December.
    3. Ahmed M. A. Sattar & B. Gharabaghi & Edward A. McBean, 2016. "Prediction of Timing of Watermain Failure Using Gene Expression Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1635-1651, March.
    4. Ahmed Sattar & B. Gharabaghi & Edward McBean, 2016. "Prediction of Timing of Watermain Failure Using Gene Expression Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1635-1651, March.
    5. Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 87-106, Spring.
    6. Debón, A. & Carrión, A. & Cabrera, E. & Solano, H., 2010. "Comparing risk of failure models in water supply networks using ROC curves," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 43-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robles-Velasco, Alicia & Cortés, Pablo & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Onieva, Luis, 2020. "Prediction of pipe failures in water supply networks using logistic regression and support vector classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Fan, Xudong & Wang, Xiaowei & Zhang, Xijin & ASCE Xiong (Bill) Yu, P.E.F., 2022. "Machine learning based water pipe failure prediction: The effects of engineering, geology, climate and socio-economic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Predicting water main failures using Bayesian model averaging and survival modelling approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 498-514.
    4. Sajjad Abdollahi & Jalil Raeisi & Mohammadreza Khalilianpour & Farshad Ahmadi & Ozgur Kisi, 2017. "Daily Mean Streamflow Prediction in Perennial and Non-Perennial Rivers Using Four Data Driven Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 4855-4874, December.
    5. Shaghaghi, Saba & Bonakdari, Hossein & Gholami, Azadeh & Ebtehaj, Isa & Zeinolabedini, Maryam, 2017. "Comparative analysis of GMDH neural network based on genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization in stable channel design," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 271-286.
    6. Sophie-Charlotte Klose & Johannes Lederer, 2020. "A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics," Papers 2006.12296, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    7. Shoshan, Vered & Hazan, Tamir & Plonsky, Ori, 2023. "BEAST-Net: Learning novel behavioral insights using a neural network adaptation of a behavioral model," OSF Preprints kaeny, Center for Open Science.
    8. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    9. Stephane Helleringer & Chong You & Laurence Fleury & Laetitia Douillot & Insa Diouf & Cheikh Tidiane Ndiaye & Valerie Delaunay & Rene Vidal, 2019. "Improving age measurement in low- and middle-income countries through computer vision: A test in Senegal," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(9), pages 219-260.
    10. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    11. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    12. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    13. Thiemo Fetzer & Stephan Kyburz, 2024. "Cohesive Institutions and Political Violence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(1), pages 133-150, January.
    14. Dang, Hai-Anh & Carletto, Calogero & Gourlay, Sydney & Abanokova, Kseniya, 2024. "Addressing Soil Quality Data Gaps with Imputation: Evidence from Ethiopia and Uganda," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1445, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2020. "Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 428-446, September.
    16. Sascha O. Becker & Thiemo Fetzer, 2018. "Has Eastern European Migration Impacted UK-born Workers?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 376, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    17. Bailliu, Jeannine & Han, Xinfen & Kruger, Mark & Liu, Yu-Hsien & Thanabalasingam, Sri, 2019. "Can media and text analytics provide insights into labour market conditions in China?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1118-1130.
    18. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    19. Crespo, Cristian, 2020. "Two become one: improving the targeting of conditional cash transfers with a predictive model of school dropout," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123139, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Ioanna Arkoudi & Carlos Lima Azevedo & Francisco C. Pereira, 2021. "Combining Discrete Choice Models and Neural Networks through Embeddings: Formulation, Interpretability and Performance," Papers 2109.12042, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1594-:d:738813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.