IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v33y2020i5d10.1007_s11213-019-09500-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational and Strategic Decisions in Hospitality. Lessons from an Action Research Process

Author

Listed:
  • Amaya Erro-Garcés

    (Universidad Pública de Navarra)

  • Laura Ramírez-Ávila

    (Universidad Pública de Navarra)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to find measures that reduce personnel costs in a catering company through the optimization of routes and tasks for staff to increase the efficiency of the company, and to transfer these measures to the sector as a whole. This paper is based on action research methodology which facilitates both taking action and creating knowledge or theory about the action analysed. Findings demonstrate that the solution focused on minimization of the workers’ operations and optimization of routes does not solve the problems identified in the company. The flexibility of action research allows adaptation of the focus on the needs of the company, and both the problem and solution are redefined. Thus, a discovered relationship between operational and organizational management is the main outcome obtained in the research. As a result, six proposals are described: clarifying task assignments, improving organizational management and the estimation of provisions, optimizing routes, reducing personal services, and improving human resources policy. It is concluded that the performance of both manager and employees is influenced by the organizational strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Amaya Erro-Garcés & Laura Ramírez-Ávila, 2020. "Operational and Strategic Decisions in Hospitality. Lessons from an Action Research Process," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 561-577, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:33:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09500-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-019-09500-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-019-09500-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-019-09500-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gelders, Ludo F. & Pintelon, Liliane M. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1987. "A location-allocation problem in a large Belgian brewery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 196-206, February.
    2. Wouters, Marc, 2009. "A developmental approach to performance measures--Results from a longitudinal case study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 64-78, February.
    3. Jansen, Derrien R. & Weert, Arjen van & Beulens, Adrie J. M. & Huirne, Ruud B. M., 2001. "Simulation model of multi-compartment distribution in the catering supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 210-224, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soysal, Mehmet & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline.M. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2012. "A Review on Quantitative Models for Sustainable Food Logistics Management," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Koksalan, Murat & Sural, Haldun & Kirca, Omer, 1995. "A location-distribution application for a beer company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 16-24, January.
    3. Francesco Capalbo & Adelaide Ippolito & Margherita Smarra & Marco Sorrentino, 2023. "Il ruolo strategico dei Sistemi di Misurazione delle Performance nelle aziende sanitarie. Un caso studio," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 119-142.
    4. van der Bruggen, Lambert & Gruson, Ruud & Salomon, Marc, 1995. "Reconsidering the distribution structure of gasoline products for a large oil company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 460-473, March.
    5. Liu, Zhimin & Wu, Zhong & Ji, Ying & Qu, Shaojian & Raza, Hassan, 2021. "Two-stage distributionally robust mixed-integer optimization model for three-level location–allocation problems under uncertain environment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    6. E. Van Der Hauwaert & W. Bruggeman, 2012. "The balanced scorecard as an enabling technology – the role of participation," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/816, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Thomas, Tyler F., 2016. "Motivating revisions of management accounting systems: An examination of organizational goals and accounting feedback," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Raimundo Díaz-Díaz & Luis Muñoz & Daniel Pérez-González, 2017. "The Business Model Evaluation Tool for Smart Cities: Application to SmartSantander Use Cases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.
    9. Mu-Chen Chen & Taho Yang & Chi-Tsung Yen, 2007. "Investigating the value of information sharing in multi-echelon supply chains," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 497-511, June.
    10. Agostino, Deborah & Arnaboldi, Michela, 2012. "Design issues in Balanced Scorecards: The “what” and “how” of control," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 327-339.
    11. Potter, Andrew & Yang, Biao & Lalwani, Chandra, 2007. "A simulation study of despatch bay performance in the steel processing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 567-578, June.
    12. Piotr Sawicki & Hanna Sawicka, 2021. "Optimisation of the Two-Tier Distribution System in Omni-Channel Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Paula M. G. Veen-Dirks & Marijke C. Leliveld & Wesley Kaufmann, 2021. "The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 269-294, June.
    14. Leanne Johnstone, 2019. "Theorising and conceptualising the sustainability control system for effective sustainability management," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 25-64, April.
    15. Klose, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 2001. "Combinatorial optimisation problems of the assignment type and a partitioning approach," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 545, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    16. Fu, Yan-Kai, 2019. "An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 164-169.
    17. Klose, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 2005. "Facility location models for distribution system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 4-29, April.
    18. Valérie Neyns & Laurent Karsenty, 2013. "How do you control performance while maintaining trust-based relationships? [Comment contrôler la performance tout en préservant des relations de confiance ?]," Post-Print hal-04464246, HAL.
    19. Giovannoni, Elena & Quarchioni, Sonia, 2019. "Exploring the generative power of performance measurement systems design," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 211-225.
    20. M T Lucas & D Chhajed, 2004. "Applications of location analysis in agriculture: a survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(6), pages 561-578, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:33:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09500-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.