IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v66y2025i2d10.1007_s00362-024-01655-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Density model checks via the lack-of-fitness

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Patilea

    (Univ Rennes, Ensai)

  • François Portier

    (Univ Rennes, Ensai)

Abstract

Parametric multivariate density estimators, such as the maximum likelihood, can be generalized by mixing them with a kernel estimator. The mixture weights can be chosen to optimize a measure of the goodness-of-fit. The optimal weight of the kernel estimator, which we call the lack-of-fitness coefficient, then provides a simple check of the parametric model. The test statistic is defined as the appropriately normalized lack-of-fitness coefficient. When the parametric density model is correct, the statistic converges in distribution to the positive part of a standard Gaussian variable, regardless of the dimension of the observations. In addition, the test has good power against alternative hypotheses approaching the density model.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Patilea & François Portier, 2025. "Density model checks via the lack-of-fitness," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01655-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-024-01655-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-024-01655-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-024-01655-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henze, Norbert & Wagner, Thorsten, 1997. "A New Approach to the BHEP Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Fan, Yanqin, 1998. "Goodness-Of-Fit Tests Based On Kernel Density Estimators With Fixed Smoothing Parameters," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(5), pages 604-621, October.
    3. Gerda Claeskens & Nils Lid Hjort, 2004. "Goodness of Fit via Non‐parametric Likelihood Ratios," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(4), pages 487-513, December.
    4. Fan, Yanqin, 1994. "Testing the Goodness of Fit of a Parametric Density Function by Kernel Method," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 316-356, June.
    5. Carlos Tenreiro, 2022. "On automatic kernel density estimate-based tests for goodness-of-fit," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 717-748, September.
    6. Ricardo Cao & Gábor Lugosi, 2005. "Goodness‐of‐fit Tests Based on the Kernel Density Estimator," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 32(4), pages 599-616, December.
    7. Kuangyu Wen & Ximing Wu, 2019. "A guided nonparametric goodness-of-fit test with application to income distributions," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 22(3), pages 207-222.
    8. Liebscher, Eckhard, 2005. "A semiparametric density estimator based on elliptical distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 205-225, January.
    9. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2020. "Tests for multivariate normality—a critical review with emphasis on weighted $$L^2$$ L 2 -statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 845-892, December.
    10. Gildas Mazo & François Portier, 2021. "Parametric versus nonparametric: The fitness coefficient," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1344-1383, December.
    11. D. R. Cox, 2013. "A return to an old paper: ‘Tests of separate families of hypotheses’," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 207-215, March.
    12. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2020. "Rejoinder on: Tests for multivariate normality—a critical review with emphasis on weighted $$L^2$$ L 2 -statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 911-913, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavia, Jose M., 2015. "Testing Goodness-of-Fit with the Kernel Density Estimator: GoFKernel," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(c01).
    2. Graciela Boente & Daniela Rodriguez & Wenceslao González Manteiga, 2014. "Goodness-of-fit Test for Directional Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(1), pages 259-275, March.
    3. Wanfang Chen & Marc G. Genton, 2023. "Are You All Normal? It Depends!," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 114-139, April.
    4. Simos Meintanis & Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović & Mirjana Veljović, 2024. "Goodness‐of‐fit tests for the multivariate Student‐t distribution based on i.i.d. data, and for GARCH observations," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 298-319, March.
    5. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    6. Carlos Tenreiro, 2022. "On automatic kernel density estimate-based tests for goodness-of-fit," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 717-748, September.
    7. Tenreiro, Carlos, 2009. "On the choice of the smoothing parameter for the BHEP goodness-of-fit test," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1038-1053, February.
    8. Chen, Feifei & Jiménez–Gamero, M. Dolores & Meintanis, Simos & Zhu, Lixing, 2022. "A general Monte Carlo method for multivariate goodness–of–fit testing applied to elliptical families," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Alfonso García-Pérez, 2021. "New Robust Cross-Variogram Estimators and Approximations of Their Distributions Based on Saddlepoint Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Delgado, Miguel A. & Song, Xiaojun, 2018. "Nonparametric tests for conditional symmetry," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 447-471.
    11. Jiménez Gamero, M.D. & Muñoz García, J. & Pino Mejías, R., 2005. "Testing goodness of fit for the distribution of errors in multivariate linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 301-322, August.
    12. Jurgita Arnastauskaitė & Tomas Ruzgas & Mindaugas Bražėnas, 2021. "A New Goodness of Fit Test for Multivariate Normality and Comparative Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Leucht, Anne & Neumann, Michael H., 2009. "Consistency of general bootstrap methods for degenerate U-type and V-type statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(8), pages 1622-1633, September.
    14. Martínez-Camblor, Pablo & de Uña-Álvarez, Jacobo, 2009. "Non-parametric k-sample tests: Density functions vs distribution functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3344-3357, July.
    15. Henze, N. & Klar, B. & Zhu, L. X., 2005. "Checking the adequacy of the multivariate semiparametric location shift model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 238-256, April.
    16. Jianqing Fan & Weining Wang & Yue Zhao, 2024. "Conditional nonparametric variable screening by neural factor regression," Papers 2408.10825, arXiv.org.
    17. Dai, Shengtao & Song, Xiaojun, 2025. "Consistent tests for semiparametric conditional independence," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Scaillet, Olivier, 2007. "Kernel-based goodness-of-fit tests for copulas with fixed smoothing parameters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 533-543, March.
    19. Tenreiro, Carlos, 2011. "An affine invariant multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1980-1992, May.
    20. Yiwen Cao & Jiajuan Liang & Longhao Xu & Jiangrui Kang, 2024. "Testing Multivariate Normality Based on Beta-Representative Points," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01655-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.