IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i11p1711-d1405870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Multivariate Normality Based on Beta-Representative Points

Author

Listed:
  • Yiwen Cao

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China)

  • Jiajuan Liang

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research and Application for Data Science, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China)

  • Longhao Xu

    (Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göettingen, 37075 Göettingen, Germany)

  • Jiangrui Kang

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China)

Abstract

Testing multivariate normality in high-dimensional data analysis has been a long-lasting topic in the area of goodness of fit. Numerous methods for this purpose can be found in the literature. Reviews on different methods given by influential researchers show that new methods keep emerging in the literature from different perspectives. The theory of statistical representative points provides a new perspective to construct tests for multivariate normality. To avoid the difficulty and huge computational load in finding the statistical representative points from a high-dimensional probability distribution, we develop an approach to constructing a test for high-dimensional normal distribution based on the representative points of the simple univariate beta distribution. The representative-points-based approach is extended to the the case that the sample size may be smaller than the dimension. A Monte Carlo study shows that the new test is able to control type I error rates fairly well for both large and small sample sizes when faced with a high dimension. The power of the new test against some non-normal distributions is generally or substantially improved for a set of selected alternative distributions. A real-data example is given for a simple application illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiwen Cao & Jiajuan Liang & Longhao Xu & Jiangrui Kang, 2024. "Testing Multivariate Normality Based on Beta-Representative Points," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1711-:d:1405870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2020. "Tests for multivariate normality—a critical review with emphasis on weighted $$L^2$$ L 2 -statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 845-892, December.
    2. Romeu, J. L. & Ozturk, A., 1993. "A Comparative Study of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 309-334, August.
    3. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2020. "Rejoinder on: Tests for multivariate normality—a critical review with emphasis on weighted $$L^2$$ L 2 -statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 911-913, December.
    4. Norbert Henze, 2002. "Invariant tests for multivariate normality: a critical review," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 467-506, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanfang Chen & Marc G. Genton, 2023. "Are You All Normal? It Depends!," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 114-139, April.
    2. Jurgita Arnastauskaitė & Tomas Ruzgas & Mindaugas Bražėnas, 2021. "A New Goodness of Fit Test for Multivariate Normality and Comparative Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Chen, Feifei & Jiménez–Gamero, M. Dolores & Meintanis, Simos & Zhu, Lixing, 2022. "A general Monte Carlo method for multivariate goodness–of–fit testing applied to elliptical families," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Tenreiro, Carlos, 2011. "An affine invariant multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1980-1992, May.
    5. Alfonso García-Pérez, 2021. "New Robust Cross-Variogram Estimators and Approximations of Their Distributions Based on Saddlepoint Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Sirao Wang & Jiajuan Liang & Min Zhou & Huajun Ye, 2022. "Testing Multivariate Normality Based on F -Representative Points," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Alfonso García-Pérez, 2022. "On Robustness for Spatio-Temporal Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Kim, Namhyun, 2016. "A robustified Jarque–Bera test for multivariate normality," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 48-52.
    9. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze & Simos Meintanis, 2024. "A unified approach to goodness-of-fit testing for spherical and hyperspherical data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3447-3475, August.
    10. Sreenivasa Rao Jammalamadaka & Emanuele Taufer & György H. Terdik, 2021. "Asymptotic theory for statistics based on cumulant vectors with applications," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 708-728, June.
    11. J. T. A. S. Ferreira & M. F. J. Steel, 2004. "On Describing Multivariate Skewness: A Directional Approach," Econometrics 0409010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Fred Huffer & Cheolyong Park, 2000. "A test for multivariate structure," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 633-650.
    13. Dante Amengual & Gabriele Fiorentini & Enrique Sentana, 2021. "Multivariate Hermite polynomials and information matrix tests," Working Paper series 21-12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    14. Jacobovic, Royi & Kella, Offer, 2022. "A characterization of normality via convex likelihood ratios," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Wangli Xu & Yanwen Li & Dawo Song, 2013. "Testing normality in mixed models using a transformation method," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 71-84, February.
    16. Norbert Henze & María Dolores Jiménez-Gamero, 2019. "A new class of tests for multinormality with i.i.d. and garch data based on the empirical moment generating function," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 499-521, June.
    17. Philip Dörr & Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2021. "Testing multivariate normality by zeros of the harmonic oscillator in characteristic function spaces," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 456-501, June.
    18. Loperfido, Nicola, 2020. "Some remarks on Koziol’s kurtosis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Henze, Norbert & Wagner, Thorsten, 1997. "A New Approach to the BHEP Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Steffen Betsch & Bruno Ebner, 2020. "Testing normality via a distributional fixed point property in the Stein characterization," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 105-138, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1711-:d:1405870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.