IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v151y2020i1d10.1007_s11205-020-02371-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation: Challenges and Potentials of Empirical Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Birte Gundelach

    (University of Zurich)

Abstract

Political consumerism features prominently as an increasing form of non-institutionalized and individualized political participation. The main challenge of empirical participation research is to integrate emerging alternative forms such as political consumerism into standard measurement instruments of participation. So far, serious deficits of existing survey instruments prevent political scientists to adequately assess the role of political consumerism within the repertoire of political participation. Originally apolitical activities such as conscious purchasing behaviour are all too easily interpreted as political participation, which undermines the political science concept of political participation. The aim of this article therefore is the presentation of an empirical research strategy to analyse political consumerism as an emerging form of political participation. I use a purposively designed online survey with more than 3500 randomly selected participants to analyse and reconcile current deficits of the empirical measurement of political consumerism as emerging form of political participation. Based on the empirical insights gained by our survey, I propose an innovative measurement instrument for political consumerism to be used in international comparative survey research.

Suggested Citation

  • Birte Gundelach, 2020. "Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation: Challenges and Potentials of Empirical Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 309-327, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:151:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02371-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02371-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-020-02371-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-020-02371-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Daniel, 2001. "The Dialectics of Shopping," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226526461.
    2. Young Min Baek, 2010. "To Buy or Not to Buy: Who are Political Consumers? What do they Think and How Do they Participate?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 1065-1086, December.
    3. Young Min Baek, 2010. "To Buy or Not to Buy: Who are Political Consumers? What do they Think and How Do they Participate?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1065-1086, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Never, Babette & Anselmetti, Chiara, 2023. "Political participation patterns of the emerging middle classes in Peru and the Philippines," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Georgios Kyroglou & Matt Henn, 2022. "On Measuring Political Consumerism: An Exploratory Study Among Young People in the UK and in Greece," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 1191-1220, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolin V. Zorell & Mundo Yang, 2019. "Real-World Sustainable Citizenship between Political Consumerism and Material Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Georgios Kyroglou & Matt Henn, 2022. "On Measuring Political Consumerism: An Exploratory Study Among Young People in the UK and in Greece," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 1191-1220, October.
    3. Pecot, Fabien & Vasilopoulou, Sofia & Cavallaro, Matteo, 2021. "How political ideology drives anti-consumption manifestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 61-69.
    4. Murat Hakan Altintas & Bahar F. Kurtulmusoglu & Hans Ruediger Kaufmann & Serkan Kilic, 2013. "Consumer boycotts of foreign products: a metric model," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 485-504, June.
    5. Delacote, Philippe & Montagné-Huck, Claire, 2012. "Political consumerism and public policy: Good complements against market failures?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 188-193.
    6. Kwangho Jung & Seung-Hee Lee & Jane Workman, 2018. "Purchasing Counterfeits and Citizenship: Public Service Motivation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Jennifer Oser, 2017. "Assessing How Participators Combine Acts in Their “Political Tool Kits”: A Person-Centered Measurement Approach for Analyzing Citizen Participation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 235-258, August.
    8. Nuno Tiago Baptista & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues, 2018. "Clustering consumers who engage in boycotting: New insights into the relationship between political consumerism and institutional trust," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(1), pages 87-104, March.
    9. DELISTAVROU, Antonia & Katrandjiev, Hristo & TILIKIDOU, Irene, 2017. "Ethical Consumers In Greece: Who Are They?," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 17(3), pages 45-67.
    10. Khalid Alharbi & Joon Kyoung Kim & Christopher Noland & Jackson Carter, 2022. "When Corporate Social Advocacy Meets Controversial Celebrity: The Role of Consumer–Brand Congruence and Consumer-Celebrity Congruence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Georgios Kyroglou & Matt Henn, 2017. "Political Consumerism as a Neoliberal Response to Youth Political Disengagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jennifer Oser & Jan E. Leighley & Kenneth M. Winneg, 2014. "Participation, Online and Otherwise: What's the Difference for Policy Preferences?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1259-1277, December.
    13. Hoffmann, Stefan & Balderjahn, Ingo & Seegebarth, Barbara & Mai, Robert & Peyer, Mathias, 2018. "Under Which Conditions Are Consumers Ready to Boycott or Buycott? The Roles of Hedonism and Simplicity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 167-178.
    14. Lucy Atkinson, 2012. "Buying In to Social Change," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 644(1), pages 191-206, November.
    15. Ash Amin, 2008. "Collective culture and urban public space," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24, April.
    16. Kolar, Tomaz & Zabkar, Vesna, 2010. "A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 652-664.
    17. Diana Mincyte, 2012. "How milk does the world good: vernacular sustainability and alternative food systems in post-socialist Europe," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(1), pages 41-52, March.
    18. Peter Luetchford, 2012. "Economic Anthropology and Ethics," Chapters, in: James G. Carrier (ed.), A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, Second Edition, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Hietanen, Joel & Mattila, Pekka & Schouten, John W. & Sihvonen, Antti & Toyoki, Sammy, 2016. "Reimagining Society Through Retail Practice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 411-425.
    20. Andrew Strathern & Pamela J. Stewart, 2012. "Ceremonial Exchange: Debates and Comparisons," Chapters, in: James G. Carrier (ed.), A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, Second Edition, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:151:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02371-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.