IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v110y2013i3p1103-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioners: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Marjolein Jeene
  • Wim Oorschot
  • Wilfred Uunk

Abstract

Research has shown that several criteria underlie people’s opinions about the welfare deservingness of benefit recipients. However, it remains unknown which factors are associated with the emphasis that people place on such criteria. Using a 2006 Dutch national survey on the welfare deservingness of disability pension recipients, we study the influence of structural and cultural factors on people’s emphasis on three deservingness criteria: control, need, and reciprocity. OLS regression analyses show that people’s emphasis on specific deservingness criteria is strengthened by structural factors that indicate the possibility of resource competition such as the following: age, lower levels of education, unemployment, and lower income. However, actual personal experience with receiving welfare benefits weakens criteria emphasis. Cultural factors such as the espousal of views from the political right and the possession of a strong work ethic are associated with a heightened emphasis on deservingness criteria. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Marjolein Jeene & Wim Oorschot & Wilfred Uunk, 2013. "Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioners: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 1103-1117, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:110:y:2013:i:3:p:1103-1117
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kangas, Olli E., 1997. "Self-interest and the common good: The impact of norms, selfishness and context in social policy opinions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 475-494.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karlijn L. A. Roex & Jesper J. Rözer, 2018. "The Social Norm to Work and the Well-Being of the Short- and Long-Term Unemployed," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 1037-1064, October.
    2. Wilfred Uunk & Wim Oorschot, 2019. "Going with the Flow? The Effect of Economic Fluctuation on People’s Solidarity with Unemployed People," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 1129-1146, June.
    3. Druckman, James N. & Levy, Jeremy & Sands, Natalie, 2021. "Bias in education disability accommodations," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Kirsten Stam & Inge Sieben & Ellen Verbakel & Paul M de Graaf, 2016. "Employment status and subjective well-being: the role of the social norm to work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(2), pages 309-333, April.
    5. Wim van Oorschot & Femke Roosma, 2015. "The social legitimacy of differently targeted benefits," ImPRovE Working Papers 15/11, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    6. Piotr Michoń, 2021. "Deservingness for "Family 500 +" Benefit in Poland: Qualitative Study of Internet Debates," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 203-223, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elsa Fornero, 2015. "Economic-financial Literacy and (Sustainable) Pension Reforms: Why the Former is a Key Ingredient for the Latter," Bankers, Markets & Investors, ESKA Publishing, issue 134, pages 6-16, January-F.
    2. Busemeyer, Marius R. & Cattaneo, Maria Alejandra & Wolter, Stefan C., 2010. "Individual policy preferences for vocational versus academic education micro level evidence for the case of Switzerland," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Guo, Jing & Gilbert, Neil, 2014. "Public attitudes toward government responsibility for child care: The impact of individual characteristics and welfare regimes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 82-89.
    4. Marco Faravelli, 2005. "Looking for Agreement: an Experiment on Distributive Justice," Working Papers 92, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2005.
    5. Gevers, J.M.P. & Gelissen, J.P.T.M. & Arts, W.A. & Muffels, R.J.A., 1999. "Public health care in balance : Exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union," WORC Paper 99.12.04, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    6. Irina Ciornei & Ettore Recchi, 2017. "At the Source of European Solidarity: Assessing the Effects of Cross-border Practices and Political Attitudes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 468-485, May.
    7. Kangas, Olli, 2003. "The grasshopper and the ants: popular opinions of just distribution in Australia and Finland," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 721-743.
    8. repec:aia:ginidp:dp33 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Gerhard Schwarz, 2009. "Determinanten der Einstellung zu wirtschaftspolitischen Maßnahmen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 37321.
    10. Busemeyer, Marius R. & Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2018. "Public opinion and the political economy of educational reforms: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 161-185.
    11. Femke Roosma & Wim van Oorschot, 2021. "Between hope and fear? Regional and social dividing lines in attitudes towards an EU minimum income scheme," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 170-181, April.
    12. Martinussen, Pål E., 2022. "Let's stick together: The role of self-interest and ideological beliefs for supporting a ‘solidaristic’ health policy in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 262-268.
    13. Deborah LEVISON & Joseph A. RITTER & Rosamund STOCK & Richard ANKER, 2002. "Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 141(4), pages 385-411, December.
    14. Walter Wymer, 2023. "Social marketing’s relevance in helping the United Nations attain its SDGs," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 529-541, September.
    15. Toomse, Mari, 2010. "Looking for a middle class bias: salary and co-operation in social surveys," ISER Working Paper Series 2010-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    16. Marii Paskov & Caroline Dewilde, 2012. "GINI DP 33: Income Inequality and Solidarity in Europe," GINI Discussion Papers 33, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:110:y:2013:i:3:p:1103-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.