IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v17y2023i8d10.1007_s11846-022-00606-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eldercare demand may inhibit workplace social courage through fear of negative evaluation: moderating role of family supportive supervisory behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Shahida Mariam

    (International Islamic University
    Government Associate Colleges)

  • Muhammad Nawaz Qaisar

    (National Accountability Bureau
    National University of Modern Languages)

  • Farooq Ahmad

    (Fatima Jinnah Women University)

  • Hafiz Ghufran Ali Khan

    (International Islamic University)

  • Ayesha Shafique

    (International Islamic University
    National University of Modern Languages)

Abstract

A dearth of employees' social courage impedes positive work outcomes. Understanding the antecedents, mechanisms, and conditions that influence workplace social courage could promote better results at the individual, team, and organizational levels. Using the stressor-strain-outcome model, conservation of resource theory, and the social exchange theory, we investigated a conditional mechanism to explain how and when people with eldercare responsibilities are likely to practice lower social courage at work. The mediating mechanism of employees’ fear of negative evaluation by their supervisors explains this relationship under the moderating effect of family supportive supervisory behavior. The empirical analysis is based on data collected from 205 public, private, and corporate sector employees having eldercare demand, in a three-wave field survey across Pakistan. The results showed that eldercare demand is positively linked to fear of negative evaluation, which reduces workplace social courage. Family supportive supervisory behavior buffered the effect of eldercare demand on fear of negative evaluation, weakening its negative effect on workplace social courage. Compared with another sample of 214 employees without eldercare, the employees with eldercare demand reported significantly higher fear of negative evaluation and lower workplace social courage. Findings show that employers need to minimize the fear of negative evaluation among employees to realize positive work outcomes related to workplace social courage. Family supportive supervisory behavior may be an excellent strategy for employees with eldercare obligations to dilute the negative implications of fear of negative evaluation and improve workplace social courage.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahida Mariam & Muhammad Nawaz Qaisar & Farooq Ahmad & Hafiz Ghufran Ali Khan & Ayesha Shafique, 2023. "Eldercare demand may inhibit workplace social courage through fear of negative evaluation: moderating role of family supportive supervisory behavior," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2869-2895, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:17:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11846-022-00606-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-022-00606-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-022-00606-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-022-00606-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Özgür Demirtaş & Aykut Arslan & Mustafa Karaca, 2019. "Correction to: Why perceived organizational and supervisory family support is important for organizations? Evidence from the field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 871-873, August.
    2. Ken Cheng & Qianlin Zhu & Yinghui Lin, 2022. "Family-Supportive Supervisor Behavior, Felt Obligation, and Unethical Pro-family Behavior: The Moderating Role of Positive Reciprocity Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 261-273, May.
    3. Tkachenko, Oleksandr & Quast, Louis N. & Song, Wei & Jang, Soebin, 2020. "Courage in the workplace: The effects of organizational level and gender on the relationship between behavioral courage and job performance," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(5), pages 899-915, September.
    4. Sonia Cruz-Ros & Diana L. Guerrero-Sánchez & Maria-Jose Miquel-Romero, 2021. "Absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation and performance: findings from SEM and fsQCA," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 235-249, February.
    5. Nikola Komlenac & Lisa Stockinger & Margarethe Hochleitner, 2022. "Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors Moderate Associations between Work Stress and Exhaustion: Testing the Job Demands–Resources Model in Academic Staff at an Austrian Medical University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Consolación Adame-Sánchez & Eva-María Caplliure & María-José Miquel-Romero, 2018. "Paving the way for coopetition: drivers for work–life balance policy implementation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 519-533, March.
    7. Özgür Demirtaş & Aykut Arslan & Mustafa Karaca, 2019. "Why perceived organizational and supervisory family support is important for organizations? Evidence from the field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 841-869, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Randerson, Kathleen, 2022. "Conceptualizing family business social responsibility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Oliver Rossmannek, 2022. "When do service suppliers leave their platform?—The role of friendships," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1311-1334, July.
    3. Ahmed Abdullah Danook & Muthanna Saad Yassin & Omar Falah Hasan al.obaidy & Ferman jarad Almejdhab, 2024. "The Absorptive Capacity of Knowledge as an Approach for Building Strategic Reliability in the Sponge Organizations/Small Organizations in Kirkuk Governorate as a Model," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 33-51, February.
    4. Nikola Komlenac & Liora Neugebauer & Jennifer Birke & Margarethe Hochleitner, 2023. "All employees benefit: arguments that help increase support for affirmative action in academic careers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    6. Kyung Yun Hwang & Eul Hyun Sung & Temitayo Shenkoya, 2022. "The Mediating and Combined Effects of Trust and Satisfaction in the Relationship between Collaboration and the Performance of Innovation in Industry—Public Research Institute Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Ma, Yuan & Liu, Changshan, 2023. "Configuration analysis of influencing factors of energy-saving behaviors: From the perspective of consumers’ pro-environmental characteristics and environmentally friendly social atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    8. Estevão, João & Lopes, José Dias & Penela, Daniela, 2023. "SDG9 and the competitiveness: Employing mixed methods to understand how countries can use science to compete," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Nicole F. Richter & Sven Hauff & Christian M. Ringle & Siegfried P. Gudergan, 2022. "The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Complementary Methods in International Management Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 449-470, August.
    10. Onur Selcuk & Beykan Cizel, 2024. "Using qualitative comparative analysis approach in tourism studies: a critical review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 933-960, February.
    11. Dr. Nasir Javed Awan, 2024. "Enhancing Organizational Performance: Investigating the Intersection of Employees’ Job Outcomes and Workplace Environment," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 310-328.
    12. Yuming Wang & Wenan Hu & Zhaopeng Liu & Jinlian Luo, 2023. "My Family Accounts Much for Me: How Does Work-to-Family Conflict Lead to Unethical Pro-Family Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Zaid Oqla Alqhaiwi & Tamer Koburtay & Jawad Syed, 2024. "The Interplay Between Islamic Work Ethic, Unethical Pro Behaviors, and Moral Identity Internalization: The Moderating Role of Religiosity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 393-408, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eldercare demand; Family supportive supervisory behavior; Fear of negative evaluation; Workplace social courage;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • J83 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Workers' Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:17:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11846-022-00606-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.