IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i6p3415-3432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical factors associated with relationship conflicts and group atmosphere among Taiwanese adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Lieh-Ching Chang
  • Maja Zelihic

Abstract

This paper investigates relationship conflict amongst Taiwanese adolescents. The data was taken on Taiwanese adolescents aged 15–17 who attended 16 high schools which are located in north, middle, south, and the east of Taiwan. They were invited to participate in the study during the 2010 school year. This paper explores the patterns among relationship conflict including its impact, the social dimensions, the time aspects, the psychological implications, the physical dimensions, and the performance and overall risks involved in group atmospheres. The ways relationship conflict handling styles correlate with the group atmosphere were also explored. Each one of the risk variables’ correlations and relationship conflict were explored. As part of this study upon correlating each one of the risk variables and relationship conflict, the researchers studied the correlations between the risk variables and the group atmosphere. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Lieh-Ching Chang & Maja Zelihic, 2014. "Critical factors associated with relationship conflicts and group atmosphere among Taiwanese adolescents," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3415-3432, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3415-3432
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9964-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9964-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9964-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peterson, Randall S. & Behfar, Kristin Jackson, 2003. "The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 102-112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I-Jun Chen & Yu Wu & Bing-Si Wei, 2017. "Effects of anxious emotions on the behavioral problems of Chinese children with learning difficulties," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1147-1165, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiunyan Wu & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2020. "A multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict and decision making: application of agent-based modeling," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Tasa, Kevin & Whyte, Glen, 2005. "Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 119-129, March.
    3. Fehr, Ryan & Gelfand, Michele J., 2010. "When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgiveness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 37-50, September.
    4. Marcela Mucalová, 2015. "Causes of conflicts of Czech accountants with their superiors and job satisfaction," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 18(1), pages 17-29.
    5. Boone, Sarah & Andries, Petra & Clarysse, Bart, 2020. "Does team entrepreneurial passion matter for relationship conflict and team performance? On the importance of fit between passion focus and venture development stage," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    6. Smaranda Boroş & Lore Gorp & Brecht Cardoen & Robert Boute, 2017. "Breaking Silos: A Field Experiment on Relational Conflict Management in Cross-Functional Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 327-356, March.
    7. Dimitrios Georgakakis & Winfried Ruigrok, 2017. "CEO Succession Origin and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 58-87, January.
    8. Raes, A. & Heijltjes, M.G. & Glunk, U. & Roe, R.A., 2006. "Conflict, trust, and effectiveness in teams performing complex tasks : a study of temporal patterns," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    9. Elfi Baillien & Jeroen Camps & Anja Van den Broeck & Jeroen Stouten & Lode Godderis & Maarten Sercu & Hans De Witte, 2016. "An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Blind: Conflict Escalation into Workplace Bullying and the Role of Distributive Conflict Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 415-429, August.
    10. Jiachun Lu & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig R. Carter, 2021. "How Informal Exchanges Impact Formal Sourcing Collaboration (and What Supply Managers Can Do about It)," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 26-62, October.
    11. Brykman, Kyle M. & O'Neill, Thomas A., 2023. "How conflict expressions affect recipients’ conflict management behaviors," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Goncalo, Jack A. & Polman, Evan & Maslach, Christina, 2010. "Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 13-24, September.
    13. Glikson, Ella & Erez, Miriam, 2020. "The emergence of a communication climate in global virtual teams," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    14. Muharrem TUNA & Fatih TURKMEN, 2014. "Conflict Management Methods of Managers: An Empirical Study of the Turkish Tourism Industry," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 1(1), pages 284-295, December.
    15. Luminita Iulia ZAIT & Bogdan Vasile NICHIFOR & Laura Catalina TIMIRAS, 2012. "Interdepartmental Conflict – a Real Barrier in the Process of Assimilating the Concept of Marketing in Organizational Practice?," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 267-274.
    16. Iván Alfaro & Ranganathan Chandrasekaran, 2015. "Software Quality and Development Speed in Global Software Development Teams," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(2), pages 91-102, April.
    17. Carmen Camelo-Ordaz & Joaquín García-Cruz & Elena Sousa-Ginel, 2015. "The Influence of Top Management Team Conflict on Firm Innovativeness," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 957-980, November.
    18. Franke, Henrik & Foerstl, Kai, 2018. "Fostering integrated research on organizational politics and conflict in teams: A cross-phenomenal review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 593-607.
    19. Naseer Muhammad & Fazal Haleem, 2019. "On the relationship between intra group conflict and group performance: Evidence from Telecom Sector of Pakistan," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 78-87, April.
    20. Parayitam, Satyanarayana & Dooley, Robert S., 2009. "The interplay between cognitive- and affective conflict and cognition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 789-796, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3415-3432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.