IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v87y2017i1d10.1007_s11069-017-2759-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding different perspectives on the preservation of community and heritage buildings in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Goded

    (GNS Science)

  • Andrew Beaupre

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Michael DeMarco

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Tina Dutra

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Andro Gogichaishvili

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Daniel Haley

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Alex Hyman

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Nicholas Kepka Calvetti

    (100, Institute Road)

  • John Potter

    (100, Institute Road)

  • Maureen Coomer

    (GNS Science)

  • Kim Wright

    (GNS Science
    Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management)

  • Andrew King

    (GNS Science)

Abstract

The Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquake sequence of 2010–2012 caused unexpectedly extreme levels of damage and disruption, being an unparalleled event in New Zealand in terms of the damage extent. Christchurch’s heritage buildings were seriously damaged during these events, with churches especially affected in 22 February 2011 M w 6.2 earthquake. During this earthquake, a total of 84% of the heritage unreinforced stone and 81% of the clay brick masonry churches in the Canterbury region were either considered unsafe (receiving red placards) or with restricted access (yellow placards). Following the earthquakes, authorities across New Zealand are reassessing the capacity of older buildings to resist earthquakes. Current legislation requires that a building judged as earthquake prone either be strengthened by retrofitting or be demolished within a legislated number of years. Many building owners are facing the problems of owning earthquake-prone buildings and lacking the funding to upgrade. This affects both community and heritage buildings, resulting in the likely abandonment or demolition of some buildings. To address the problem of the balance between life safety and preservation in the Wellington Region, this project gathered and compared the perspectives of the general public, church communities, heritage specialists, professional engineers, and local authorities to assist in balancing the interests of these stakeholders. As a result of the findings, several recommendations have been provided that include standardizing structural assessment processes and training, feasibility of additional public funding to upgrade buildings, new signage to increase public awareness of earthquake-prone buildings, and regular communication among stakeholders to understand and resolve differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Goded & Andrew Beaupre & Michael DeMarco & Tina Dutra & Andro Gogichaishvili & Daniel Haley & Alex Hyman & Nicholas Kepka Calvetti & John Potter & Maureen Coomer & Kim Wright & Andrew King, 2017. "Understanding different perspectives on the preservation of community and heritage buildings in the Wellington Region, New Zealand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 185-212, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:87:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-2759-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-2759-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-017-2759-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-017-2759-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Johnston & Sarah Standring & Kevin Ronan & Michael Lindell & Thomas Wilson & Jim Cousins & Emma Aldridge & Michael Ardagh & Joanne Deely & Steven Jensen & Thomas Kirsch & Richard Bissell, 2014. "The 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes: context and cause of injury," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 627-637, September.
    2. Kenny, Charles, 2009. "Why do people die in earthquakes ? the costs, benefits and institutions of disaster risk reduction in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4823, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filippova, Olga & Noy, Ilan, 2018. "Preventing buildings from falling down: Challenges for earthquake-strengthening policy in small-town New Zealand," Working Paper Series 6961, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Filippova, Olga & Noy, Ilan, 2018. "Preventing buildings from falling down: Challenges for earthquake-strengthening policy in small-town New Zealand," Working Paper Series 20317, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Bruno S. Frey & David A. Savage & Benno Torgler, 2011. "Behavior under Extreme Conditions: The Titanic Disaster," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(1), pages 209-222, Winter.
    3. Emily S. Lambie & Thomas M. Wilson & Erik Brogt & David M. Johnston & Michael Ardagh & Joanne Deely & Steven Jensen & Shirley Feldmann-Jensen, 2017. "Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Earthquake Behaviour Coding Methodology: analysis of Christchurch Public Hospital video data from the 22 February Christchurch earthquake event," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1175-1192, April.
    4. Keefer, Philip & Neumayer, Eric & Plümper, Thomas, 2011. "Earthquake Propensity and the Politics of Mortality Prevention," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1530-1541, September.
    5. Kazuya Nakayachi & Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Maximilian Dixon, 2019. "Residents’ Reactions to Earthquake Early Warnings in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1723-1740, August.
    6. Chang, Kuo-Hao & Hsiung, Tzu-Yi & Chang, Tzu-Yin, 2022. "Multi-Commodity distribution under uncertainty in disaster response phase: Model, solution method, and an empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 857-876.
    7. Emily Wilkinson & Emma Lovell & Barbara Carby & Jenni Barclay & Richard E.A. Robertson, 2016. "The Dilemmas of Risk-Sensitive Development on a Small Volcanic Island," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Ahlerup, Pelle, 2009. "Earthquakes and Civil War," Working Papers in Economics 387, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    9. D. A. Novelo-Casanova & A. Ponce-Pacheco & A. Hernández-Hernández & A. Juárez-Sánchez & M. I. López-Pérez & M. G. Hernández-Bello & O. Vega-Flores, 2019. "Seismic and flood structural risk in Motozintla, Chiapas, Mexico," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(3), pages 721-737, February.
    10. Chang, Kuo-Hao & Wu, Ying-Zheng & Su, Wen-Ray & Lin, Lee-Yaw, 2024. "A simulation evacuation framework for effective disaster preparedness strategies and response decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 733-746.
    11. Daoud, Adel & Halleröd, Björn & Guha Sapir, Debarati, 2015. "Quality of government and the relationship between natural disasters and child poverty: A comparative analysis," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    12. Zhen Xu & Xinzheng Lu & Hong Guan & Yuan Tian & Aizhu Ren, 2016. "Simulation of earthquake-induced hazards of falling exterior non-structural components and its application to emergency shelter design," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 935-950, January.
    13. Xiaolu Gao & Jue Ji, 2014. "Analysis of the seismic vulnerability and the structural characteristics of houses in Chinese rural areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(2), pages 1099-1114, January.
    14. Zhen Xu & Xinzheng Lu & Hong Guan & Yuan Tian & Aizhu Ren, 2016. "Simulation of earthquake-induced hazards of falling exterior non-structural components and its application to emergency shelter design," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 935-950, January.
    15. Adel Daoud & Björn Halleröd & Debarati Guha-Sapir, 2016. "What Is the Association between Absolute Child Poverty, Poor Governance, and Natural Disasters? A Global Comparison of Some of the Realities of Climate Change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:87:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-2759-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.