IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v176y2018i2d10.1007_s10957-018-1219-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended Farkas’s Lemmas and Strong Dualities for Conic Programming Involving Composite Functions

Author

Listed:
  • D. H. Fang

    (Jishou University)

  • Y. Zhang

    (Jishou University)

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the study of a new class of conic constrained optimization problems with objectives given as differences of a composite function and a convex function. We first introduce some new notions of constraint qualifications in terms of the epigraphs of the conjugates of these functions. Under the new constraint qualifications, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for several versions of Farkas lemmas to hold. Similarly, we provide characterizations for conic constrained optimization problems to have the strong or stable strong dualities such as Lagrange, Fenchel–Lagrange or Toland–Fenchel–Lagrange duality.

Suggested Citation

  • D. H. Fang & Y. Zhang, 2018. "Extended Farkas’s Lemmas and Strong Dualities for Conic Programming Involving Composite Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 351-376, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:176:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1219-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-018-1219-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-018-1219-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-018-1219-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Dinh & G. Vallet & M. Volle, 2014. "Functional inequalities and theorems of the alternative involving composite functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 837-863, August.
    2. V. Jeyakumar & G. M. Lee & N. Dinh, 2004. "Lagrange Multiplier Conditions Characterizing the Optimal Solution Sets of Cone-Constrained Convex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 83-103, October.
    3. R. I. Boţ & S. M. Grad & G. Wanka, 2007. "New Constraint Qualification and Conjugate Duality for Composed Convex Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 241-255, November.
    4. N. Dinh & M. A. Goberna & M. A. López & T. H. Mo, 2017. "Farkas-Type Results for Vector-Valued Functions with Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 357-390, May.
    5. R. Horst & N. V. Thoai, 1999. "DC Programming: Overview," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 1-43, October.
    6. V. Jeyakumar, 2008. "Constraint Qualifications Characterizing Lagrangian Duality in Convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 31-41, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingrang Xu & Shengjie Li, 2022. "Optimality and Duality for DC Programming with DC Inequality and DC Equality Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen Dinh & Dang Hai Long, 2022. "A Perturbation Approach to Vector Optimization Problems: Lagrange and Fenchel–Lagrange Duality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 713-748, August.
    2. N. Dinh & V. Jeyakumar, 2014. "Farkas’ lemma: three decades of generalizations for mathematical optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Nguyen Dinh & Miguel A. Goberna & Dang H. Long & Marco A. López-Cerdá, 2019. "New Farkas-Type Results for Vector-Valued Functions: A Non-abstract Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 4-29, July.
    4. Shota Takahashi & Mituhiro Fukuda & Mirai Tanaka, 2022. "New Bregman proximal type algorithms for solving DC optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 893-931, December.
    5. Xiangyu Cui & Xun Li & Duan Li & Yun Shi, 2014. "Time Consistent Behavior Portfolio Policy for Dynamic Mean-Variance Formulation," Papers 1408.6070, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    6. Nadja Harms & Tim Hoheisel & Christian Kanzow, 2015. "On a Smooth Dual Gap Function for a Class of Player Convex Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 659-685, August.
    7. Boglárka G.-Tóth & Kristóf Kovács, 2016. "Solving a Huff-like Stackelberg location problem on networks," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 233-247, February.
    8. Rafael Blanquero & Emilio Carrizosa & Amaya Nogales-Gómez & Frank Plastria, 2014. "Single-facility huff location problems on networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 175-195, November.
    9. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.
    10. M. Bierlaire & M. Thémans & N. Zufferey, 2010. "A Heuristic for Nonlinear Global Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70, February.
    11. Andreas Löhne & Andrea Wagner, 2017. "Solving DC programs with a polyhedral component utilizing a multiple objective linear programming solver," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 369-385, October.
    12. N. V. Thoai, 2000. "Duality Bound Method for the General Quadratic Programming Problem with Quadratic Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 331-354, November.
    13. R. Blanquero & E. Carrizosa, 2000. "Optimization of the Norm of a Vector-Valued DC Function and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 245-260, November.
    14. Jean-Paul Penot, 2011. "The directional subdifferential of the difference of two convex functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 505-519, March.
    15. Xiangyang Huang & LiGuo Huang, 2023. "Spreading Points Using Gradient and Tabu," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, June.
    16. Mounir El Maghri, 2015. "( $$\epsilon $$ ϵ -)Efficiency in difference vector optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 803-812, April.
    17. T. D. Chuong & V. Jeyakumar & G. Li, 2019. "A new bounded degree hierarchy with SOCP relaxations for global polynomial optimization and conic convex semi-algebraic programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 885-919, December.
    18. Massol, Olivier & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2014. "Export diversification through resource-based industrialization: The case of natural gas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1067-1082.
    19. H. Luo & X. Huang & J. Peng, 2012. "Generalized weak sharp minima in cone-constrained convex optimization with applications," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 807-821, December.
    20. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2020. "New global optimality conditions for nonsmooth DC optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 25-55, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:176:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1219-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.