IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i4d10.1007_s10845-017-1361-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Grey online modeling surface roughness monitoring system in end milling operations

Author

Listed:
  • PoTsang B. Huang

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

  • Huang-Jie Zhang

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

  • Yi-Ching Lin

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

Abstract

The industry faces a trend of fabricating a product with high-variety and short life cycles since the change of consumer behaviors. The quality control becomes critical. In milling process, surface roughness is key quality characteristic measured by an off-line method. The off-line measurement is time consuming. Therefore, online surface roughness monitoring systems, which can eliminate the measurement time and enhance the productivity, have gained popularity for machining. However, to accurately construct the system, a large amount of data and time for off-line training and modeling are required, which make the system not suitable for a high-variety job shop production. It is necessary to develop a method without large data and off-line training and modeling. Therefore, a Grey online modeling surface roughness monitoring (GOMSRM) system is proposed in this study by utilizing the Grey theory GM(1, N) with bilateral best-fit method, which requires less data and no training time to perform the online modeling surface roughness monitoring system. The ability of an online modeling makes the system flexible to monitor different types of products. The model could be built during each changeover process of the milling, which can significantly eliminate the time of training in advance used by other off-line modeling methods. The results show the GOMSRM system can accurately predict the surface roughness. The comparison between the GOMSRM system and the system developed by a neural network shows the GOMSRM system has better accuracy and fewer samples for modeling. Graphical Abstract

Suggested Citation

  • PoTsang B. Huang & Huang-Jie Zhang & Yi-Ching Lin, 2019. "Development of a Grey online modeling surface roughness monitoring system in end milling operations," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1923-1936, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1361-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1361-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-017-1361-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-017-1361-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. PoTsang B. Huang, 2016. "An intelligent neural-fuzzy model for an in-process surface roughness monitoring system in end milling operations," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 689-700, June.
    2. S. Tangjitsitcharoen & P. Thesniyom & S. Ratanakuakangwan, 2017. "Prediction of surface roughness in ball-end milling process by utilizing dynamic cutting force ratio," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 13-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenwen Tian & Jiong Zhang & Fei Zhao & Xiaobing Feng & Xuesong Mei & Guangde Chen & Hao Wang, 2024. "Interpolation-based virtual sample generation for surface roughness prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 343-353, January.
    2. Andres Bustillo & Danil Yu. Pimenov & Mozammel Mia & Wojciech Kapłonek, 2021. "Machine-learning for automatic prediction of flatness deviation considering the wear of the face mill teeth," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 895-912, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shubham Vaishnav & Ankit Agarwal & K. A. Desai, 2020. "Machine learning-based instantaneous cutting force model for end milling operation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1353-1366, August.
    2. Gerardo Beruvides & Fernando Castaño & Rodolfo E. Haber & Ramón Quiza & Alberto Villalonga, 2017. "Coping with Complexity When Predicting Surface Roughness in Milling Processes: Hybrid Incremental Model with Optimal Parametrization," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, December.
    3. Yunhan Kim & Taekyum Kim & Byeng D. Youn & Sung-Hoon Ahn, 2022. "Machining quality monitoring (MQM) in laser-assisted micro-milling of glass using cutting force signals: an image-based deep transfer learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1813-1828, August.
    4. Kuo Lu & Jin Xie & Risen Wang & Lei Li & Wenzhe Li & Yuning Jiang, 2022. "A closed-loop intelligent adjustment of process parameters in precise and micro hot-embossing using an in-process optic detection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2341-2355, December.
    5. Zengya Zhao & Sibao Wang & Zehua Wang & Shilong Wang & Chi Ma & Bo Yang, 2022. "Surface roughness stabilization method based on digital twin-driven machining parameters self-adaption adjustment: a case study in five-axis machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 943-952, April.
    6. Zhenyu Liu & Donghao Zhang & Weiqiang Jia & Xianke Lin & Hui Liu, 2020. "An adversarial bidirectional serial–parallel LSTM-based QTD framework for product quality prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1511-1529, August.
    7. Alexander Gerling & Holger Ziekow & Andreas Hess & Ulf Schreier & Christian Seiffer & Djaffar Ould Abdeslam, 2022. "Comparison of algorithms for error prediction in manufacturing with automl and a cost-based metric," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 555-573, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1361-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.