IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i4d10.1007_s10845-017-1345-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed multi-agent scheduling and control system for robotic flexible assembly cells

Author

Listed:
  • Abderraouf Maoudj

    (Centre de Développement des Technologies Avancées (CDTA)
    Université des sciences et de la technologie Houari-Boumédiène (USTHB))

  • Brahim Bouzouia

    (Centre de Développement des Technologies Avancées (CDTA))

  • Abdelfetah Hentout

    (Centre de Développement des Technologies Avancées (CDTA))

  • Ahmed Kouider

    (Centre de Développement des Technologies Avancées (CDTA))

  • Redouane Toumi

    (Université des sciences et de la technologie Houari-Boumédiène (USTHB))

Abstract

This paper deals with the development of a distributed multi-agent system (DMAS) for scheduling and controlling Robotic Flexible Assembly Cells (RFAC). In the proposed system, an approach for solving one of the most challenging decisional problems in RFAC is proposed and implemented. This problem is related to the products operations scheduling which requires their allocation and sequencing on the robots, while satisfying products and robots constraints under makespan minimization. The proposed DMAS addresses this challenge by using a cooperative approach supported by three kinds of autonomous control agents: supervisory agent, local agents, and remote agents. These agents interact by a negotiation protocol based on common dispatching rules for coordinating their individual decisions, satisfying their local objective and providing an optimized global solution. Moreover, because of the dynamic nature of the assembly systems, it is imperative to consider external disturbances on production scheduling and to solve the related issues. Consequently, DMAS has the ability to respond and manage some dynamic events that may occur in the cells such as unexpected robot breakdown or dynamic products arrivals. Computational results on benchmarks show the effectiveness and the robustness of the proposed system.

Suggested Citation

  • Abderraouf Maoudj & Brahim Bouzouia & Abdelfetah Hentout & Ahmed Kouider & Redouane Toumi, 2019. "Distributed multi-agent scheduling and control system for robotic flexible assembly cells," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1629-1644, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1345-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdelhakim AitZai & Brahim Benmedjdoub & Mourad Boudhar, 2016. "Branch-and-bound and PSO algorithms for no-wait job shop scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 679-688, June.
    2. Vadlamani, Satish & Hosseini, Seyedmohsen, 2014. "A novel heuristic approach for solving aircraft landing problem with single runway," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 144-148.
    3. Ho, Nhu Binh & Tay, Joc Cing & Lai, Edmund M.-K., 2007. "An effective architecture for learning and evolving flexible job-shop schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 316-333, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuan Jing & Xifan Yao & Min Liu & Jiajun Zhou, 2024. "Multi-agent reinforcement learning based on graph convolutional network for flexible job shop scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 75-93, January.
    2. William Derigent & Olivier Cardin & Damien Trentesaux, 2021. "Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1797-1818, October.
    3. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Swapnil Bhalla & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2022. "Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 311-332, January.
    4. Phong B. Dao, 2021. "Learning Feedforward Control Using Multiagent Control Approach for Motion Control Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Adan, Ivo J.B.F., 2024. "Enhancing stability and robustness in online machine shop scheduling: A multi-agent system and negotiation-based approach for handling machine downtime in industry 4.0," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 569-583.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    2. Jose L. Andrade-Pineda & David Canca & Pedro L. Gonzalez-R & M. Calle, 2020. "Scheduling a dual-resource flexible job shop with makespan and due date-related criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 5-35, August.
    3. Václavík, Roman & Novák, Antonín & Šůcha, Přemysl & Hanzálek, Zdeněk, 2018. "Accelerating the Branch-and-Price Algorithm Using Machine Learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1055-1069.
    4. Chandra, Aitichya & Choubey, Nipun & Verma, Ashish & Sooraj, K.P., 2024. "Quasi-stochastic optimization model for time-based arrival scheduling considering Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) track time and a new delay-conflict relationship," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Hao-Chin Chang & Tung-Kuan Liu, 2017. "Optimisation of distributed manufacturing flexible job shop scheduling by using hybrid genetic algorithms," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1973-1986, December.
    6. Salehipour, Amir, 2020. "An algorithm for single- and multiple-runway aircraft landing problem," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 179-191.
    7. Pohl, Maximilian & Kolisch, Rainer & Schiffer, Maximilian, 2021. "Runway scheduling during winter operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Jianan Yin & Yuanyuan Ma & Yuxin Hu & Ke Han & Suwan Yin & Hua Xie, 2021. "Delay, Throughput and Emission Tradeoffs in Airport Runway Scheduling with Uncertainty Considerations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 85-122, March.
    9. García-Villoria, Alberto & Salhi, Said & Corominas, Albert & Pastor, Rafael, 2011. "Hyper-heuristic approaches for the response time variability problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 160-169, May.
    10. Lieder, Alexander & Stolletz, Raik, 2016. "Scheduling aircraft take-offs and landings on interdependent and heterogeneous runways," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 167-188.
    11. Li Zhou & Zhuoning Chen & Shaoping Chen, 2018. "An effective detailed operation scheduling in MES based on hybrid genetic algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 135-153, January.
    12. Zhang, Zhe & Gong, Xue & Song, Xiaoling & Yin, Yong & Lev, Benjamin & Chen, Jie, 2022. "A column generation-based exact solution method for seru scheduling problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Zhang, Junfeng & Zhao, Pengli & Zhang, Yu & Dai, Ximei & Sui, Dong, 2020. "Criteria selection and multi-objective optimization of aircraft landing problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. K. Venkata Rao & P. B. G. S. N. Murthy, 2018. "Modeling and optimization of tool vibration and surface roughness in boring of steel using RSM, ANN and SVM," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1533-1543, October.
    15. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Huang, Huijung & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Logic-based Benders decomposition method for the seru scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time and DeJong’s learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 866-877.
    16. Vilcot, Geoffrey & Billaut, Jean-Charles, 2008. "A tabu search and a genetic algorithm for solving a bicriteria general job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 398-411, October.
    17. Shen, Liji & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Neufeld, Janis S., 2018. "Solving the flexible job shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 503-516.
    18. González, Miguel A. & Vela, Camino R. & Varela, Ramiro, 2015. "Scatter search with path relinking for the flexible job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 35-45.
    19. Ng, K.K.H. & Lee, C.K.M. & Chan, Felix T.S. & Qin, Yichen, 2017. "Robust aircraft sequencing and scheduling problem with arrival/departure delay using the min-max regret approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 115-136.
    20. Baoyu Liao & Xingming Wang & Xing Zhu & Shanlin Yang & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Less is more approach for competing groups scheduling with different learning effects," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 33-54, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1345-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.