IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i7d10.1007_s10845-020-01532-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges

Author

Listed:
  • William Derigent

    (CRAN, CNRS, UMR 7039)

  • Olivier Cardin

    (LUNAM Université, Université de Nantes, LS2N UMR CNRS 6004)

  • Damien Trentesaux

    (LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, UPHF)

Abstract

The flexibility claimed by the next generation production systems induces a deep modification of the behaviour and the core itself of the control systems. Over-connectivity and data management abilities targeted by Industry 4.0 paradigm enable the emergence of more flexible and reactive control systems, based on the cooperation of autonomous and connected entities in the decision-making process. From most relevant articles extracted from existing literature, a list of 10 key enablers for Industry 4.0 is first presented. During the last 20 years, the holonic paradigm has become a major paradigm of Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. After the presentation of the holonic paradigm and holon properties, this article highlights how historical and current holonic control architectures can partly fulfil Industry 4.0 key enablers. The remaining unfulfilled key enablers are then the subject of an extensive discussion on the remaining research perspectives on holonic architectures needed to achieve a complete support of Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • William Derigent & Olivier Cardin & Damien Trentesaux, 2021. "Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1797-1818, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01532-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01532-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01532-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01532-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongxin Liao & Fernando Deschamps & Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures & Luiz Felipe Pierin Ramos, 2017. "Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3609-3629, June.
    2. Abderraouf Maoudj & Brahim Bouzouia & Abdelfetah Hentout & Ahmed Kouider & Redouane Toumi, 2019. "Distributed multi-agent scheduling and control system for robotic flexible assembly cells," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1629-1644, April.
    3. Yampolskiy, Mark & Horváth, Péter & Koutsoukos, Xenofon D. & Xue, Yuan & Sztipanovits, Janos, 2015. "A language for describing attacks on cyber-physical systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 40-52.
    4. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, April.
    5. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Stahre, Johan, 2017. "Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 154-169.
    6. Adrià Salvador Palau & Maharshi Harshadbhai Dhada & Ajith Kumar Parlikad, 2019. "Multi-agent system architectures for collaborative prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2999-3013, December.
    7. Mingtao Wu & Zhengyi Song & Young B. Moon, 2019. "Detecting cyber-physical attacks in CyberManufacturing systems with machine learning methods," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1111-1123, March.
    8. Olivier Cardin & Damien Trentesaux & André Thomas & Pierre Castagna & Thierry Berger & Hind Bril El-Haouzi, 2017. "Coupling predictive scheduling and reactive control in manufacturing hybrid control architectures: state of the art and future challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1503-1517, October.
    9. Theodor Borangiu & Silviu Răileanu & Thierry Berger & Damien Trentesaux, 2015. "Switching mode control strategy in manufacturing execution systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 1950-1963, April.
    10. Akella, Ravi & Tang, Han & McMillin, Bruce M., 2010. "Analysis of information flow security in cyber–physical systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 157-173.
    11. Ahmad E. Elhabashy & Lee J. Wells & Jaime A. Camelio & William H. Woodall, 2019. "A cyber-physical attack taxonomy for production systems: a quality control perspective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2489-2504, August.
    12. Juha Puttonen & Andrei Lobov & Maria A. Cavia Soto & José L. Martinez Lastra, 2019. "Cloud computing as a facilitator for web service composition in factory automation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 687-700, February.
    13. Jose-Fernando Jimenez & Abdelghani Bekrar & Gabriel Zambrano-Rey & Damien Trentesaux & Paulo Leitão, 2017. "Pollux: a dynamic hybrid control architecture for flexible job shop systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4229-4247, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaobao Zhu & Jing Shi & Fengjie Xie & Rouqi Song, 2020. "Pricing strategy and system performance in a cloud-based manufacturing system built on blockchain technology," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1985-2002, December.
    2. Edgar Chacón & Luis Alberto Cruz Salazar & Juan Cardillo & Yenny Alexandra Paredes Astudillo, 2021. "A control architecture for continuous production processes based on industry 4.0: water supply systems application," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 2061-2081, October.
    3. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Kipper, Liane Mahlmann & Iepsen, Sandra & Dal Forno, Ana Julia & Frozza, Rejane & Furstenau, Leonardo & Agnes, Jéssica & Cossul, Danielli, 2021. "Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Dashi Nazarov & Anton Klarin, 2020. "Taxonomy of Industry 4.0 research: Mapping scholarship and industry insights," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 535-556, July.
    7. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Jajja, Shakeel Sadiq & Cao, Dongmei & Ma, Xiao, 2024. "Unpacking Digital Transformation: Identifying key enablers, transition stages and digital archetypes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    9. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Sony, Michael & Naik, Subhash, 2020. "Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    12. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Loris Gaio, 2005. "A diversity-based approach to requirements tracing in new product development," ROCK Working Papers 031, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    14. B. A. Huberman & N. S. Glance, "undated". "Diversity and Collective Action," Working Papers _001, Xerox Research Park.
    15. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    16. Rekettye, Gábor & Rekettye, Gábor, 2019. "The Effects of Digitalization on Customer Experience," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 414-420, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    17. David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period," Working Papers 2012.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    18. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    19. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2021. "A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1161-1191, October.
    20. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01532-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.