IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v62y2015i2p391-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing the net present value of a Steiner tree

Author

Listed:
  • K. Sirinanda
  • M. Brazil
  • P. Grossman
  • J. Rubinstein
  • D. Thomas

Abstract

The theory of Steiner trees has been extensively applied in physical network design problems to locate a Steiner point that minimizes the total length of a tree. However, maximizing the total generated cash flows of a tree has not been investigated. Such a tree has costs associated with its edges and values associated with nodes. In order to reach the nodes in the tree, the edges need to be constructed. The edges are constructed in a particular order and the costs of constructing the edges and the values at the nodes are discounted over time. These discounted costs and values generate cash flows. In this paper, we study the problem of optimally locating a single Steiner point so as to maximize the sum of all the discounted cash flows, known as the net present value (NPV). An application of this problem occurs in underground mining where, we want to optimally locate a junction point in the underground access network to maximize the NPV. We propose an efficient iterative algorithm to optimally locate a single degree-3 Steiner point. We show this algorithm converges quickly and the Steiner point is unique subject to realistic design parameters. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • K. Sirinanda & M. Brazil & P. Grossman & J. Rubinstein & D. Thomas, 2015. "Maximizing the net present value of a Steiner tree," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 391-407, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:62:y:2015:i:2:p:391-407
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-014-0246-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-014-0246-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-014-0246-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra M. Newman & Enrique Rubio & Rodrigo Caro & Andrés Weintraub & Kelly Eurek, 2010. "A Review of Operations Research in Mine Planning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 222-245, June.
    2. Newman, Alexandra M. & Kuchta, Mark, 2007. "Using aggregation to optimize long-term production planning at an underground mine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1205-1218, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Sirinanda & M. Brazil & P. Grossman & J. Rubinstein & D. Thomas, 2016. "Gradient-constrained discounted Steiner trees II: optimally locating a discounted Steiner point," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 515-532, March.
    2. K. Sirinanda & M. Brazil & P. Grossman & J. Rubinstein & D. Thomas, 2016. "Gradient-constrained discounted Steiner trees I: optimal tree configurations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 497-513, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalo Muñoz & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Maurice Queyranne & Orlando Rivera Letelier, 2018. "A study of the Bienstock–Zuckerberg algorithm: applications in mining and resource constrained project scheduling," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 501-534, March.
    2. Marco Schulze & Julia Rieck & Cinna Seifi & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2016. "Machine scheduling in underground mining: an application in the potash industry," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 365-403, March.
    3. O’Sullivan, Dónal & Newman, Alexandra, 2015. "Optimization-based heuristics for underground mine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 248-259.
    4. Zhang, Jian & Nault, Barrie R. & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos G., 2019. "Optimizing a mineral value chain with market uncertainty using benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 227-239.
    5. Michelle L. Blom & Adrian R. Pearce & Peter J. Stuckey, 2016. "A Decomposition-Based Algorithm for the Scheduling of Open-Pit Networks Over Multiple Time Periods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 3059-3084, October.
    6. Alessandro Hill & Andrea J. Brickey & Italo Cipriano & Marcos Goycoolea & Alexandra Newman, 2022. "Optimization Strategies for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems in Underground Mining," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3042-3058, November.
    7. Rafael Epstein & Marcel Goic & Andrés Weintraub & Jaime Catalán & Pablo Santibáñez & Rodolfo Urrutia & Raúl Cancino & Sergio Gaete & Augusto Aguayo & Felipe Caro, 2012. "Optimizing Long-Term Production Plans in Underground and Open-Pit Copper Mines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 4-17, February.
    8. Amina Lamghari & Roussos Dimitrakopoulos & Jacques Ferland, 2015. "A hybrid method based on linear programming and variable neighborhood descent for scheduling production in open-pit mines," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 555-582, November.
    9. King, Barry & Goycoolea, Marcos & Newman, A., 2017. "Optimizing the open pit-to-underground mining transition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 297-309.
    10. K. Sirinanda & M. Brazil & P. Grossman & J. Rubinstein & D. Thomas, 2016. "Gradient-constrained discounted Steiner trees II: optimally locating a discounted Steiner point," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 515-532, March.
    11. Renaud Chicoisne & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Enrique Rubio, 2012. "A New Algorithm for the Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 517-528, June.
    12. Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Morales, Nelson & Cornillier, Fabien, 2022. "A recursive time aggregation-disaggregation heuristic for the multidimensional and multiperiod precedence-constrained knapsack problem: An application to the open-pit mine block sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1088-1099.
    13. Nakousi, C. & Pascual, R. & Anani, A. & Kristjanpoller, F. & Lillo, P., 2018. "An asset-management oriented methodology for mine haul-fleet usage scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 336-344.
    14. Young Woong Park, 2021. "Optimization for L 1 -Norm Error Fitting via Data Aggregation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 120-142, January.
    15. Pérez, Juan & Maldonado, Sebastián & González-Ramírez, Rosa, 2018. "Decision support for fleet allocation and contract renegotiation in contracted open-pit mine blasting operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 59-69.
    16. Nesbitt, Peter & Blake, Lewis R. & Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo K. & Newman, Alexandra & Brickey, Andrea, 2021. "Underground mine scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 340-352.
    17. Noriega, Roberto & Pourrahimian, Yashar, 2022. "A systematic review of artificial intelligence and data-driven approaches in strategic open-pit mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. W. Lambert & A. Newman, 2014. "Tailored Lagrangian Relaxation for the open pit block sequencing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 419-438, November.
    19. Jyrki Savolainen & Ramin Rakhsha & Richard Durham, 2022. "Simulation-based decision-making system for optimal mine production plan selection," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(2), pages 267-281, June.
    20. Mikael Collan & Jyrki Savolainen & Pasi Luukka, 2017. "Investigating the effect of price process selection on the value of a metal mining asset portfolio," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(2), pages 107-115, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:62:y:2015:i:2:p:391-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.