IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v33y2016i2d10.1007_s00357-016-9202-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proof of the Duality of the DINA Model and the DINO Model

Author

Listed:
  • Hans-Friedrich Köhn

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Chia-Yi Chiu

    (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)

Abstract

The Deterministic Input Noisy Output “AND” gate (DINA) model and the Deterministic Input Noisy Output “OR” gate (DINO) model are two popular cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) for educational assessment. They represent different views on how the mastery of cognitive skills and the probability of a correct item response are related. Recently, however, Liu, Xu, and Ying demonstrated that the DINO model and the DINA model share a “dual” relation. This means that one model can be expressed in terms of the other, and which of the two models is fitted to a given data set is essentially irrelevant because the results are identical. In this article, a proof of the duality of the DINA model and the DINO model is presented that is tailored to the form and parameterization of general CDMs that have become the new theoretical standard in cognitively diagnostic modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Chia-Yi Chiu, 2016. "A Proof of the Duality of the DINA Model and the DINO Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(2), pages 171-184, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:33:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00357-016-9202-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00357-016-9202-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00357-016-9202-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00357-016-9202-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George B. Macready & C. Mitchell Dayton, 1977. "The Use of Probabilistic Models in the Assessment of Mastery," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 2(2), pages 99-120, June.
    2. Chia-Yi Chiu & Jeffrey Douglas & Xiaodong Li, 2009. "Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: Theory and Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 633-665, December.
    3. E. Maris, 1999. "Estimating multiple classification latent class models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 187-212, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2023. "A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 158-174, March.
    2. Pablo Nájera & Francisco J. Abad & Chia-Yi Chiu & Miguel A. Sorrel, 2023. "The Restricted DINA Model: A Comprehensive Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Classroom-Level Assessments," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 719-749, December.
    3. Peida Zhan & Hong Jiao & Kaiwen Man & Lijun Wang, 2019. "Using JAGS for Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: A Tutorial," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(4), pages 473-503, August.
    4. Chia-Yi Chiu & Hans-Friedrich Köhn, 2019. "Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 830-845, September.
    5. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Kensuke Okada, 2020. "Variational Bayes Inference for the DINA Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(5), pages 569-597, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chia-Yi Chiu & Yan Sun & Yanhong Bian, 2018. "Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 355-375, June.
    2. Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Chia-Yi Chiu, 2019. "Attribute Hierarchy Models in Cognitive Diagnosis: Identifiability of the Latent Attribute Space and Conditions for Completeness of the Q-Matrix," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(3), pages 541-565, October.
    3. Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Chia-Yi Chiu, 2018. "How to Build a Complete Q-Matrix for a Cognitively Diagnostic Test," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 35(2), pages 273-299, July.
    4. Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Chia-Yi Chiu, 2017. "A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 112-132, March.
    5. Chia-Yi Chiu & Hans-Friedrich Köhn, 2019. "Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 830-845, September.
    6. Hans Friedrich Köhn & Chia-Yi Chiu, 2021. "A Unified Theory of the Completeness of Q-Matrices for the DINA Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(3), pages 500-518, October.
    7. Elizabeth Ayers & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Rebecca Nugent, 2013. "Incorporating Student Covariates in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(2), pages 195-224, July.
    8. Yuqi Gu, 2023. "Generic Identifiability of the DINA Model and Blessing of Latent Dependence," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 117-131, March.
    9. Chia-Yi Chiu & Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Yi Zheng & Robert Henson, 2016. "Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1069-1092, December.
    10. Chia-Yi Chiu & Jeff Douglas, 2013. "A Nonparametric Approach to Cognitive Diagnosis by Proximity to Ideal Response Patterns," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(2), pages 225-250, July.
    11. Peida Zhan & Wen-Chung Wang & Xiaomin Li, 2020. "A Partial Mastery, Higher-Order Latent Structural Model for Polytomous Attributes in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(2), pages 328-351, July.
    12. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2019. "Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis $$\varvec{Q}$$ Q Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 333-357, June.
    13. Shiyu Wang & Jeff Douglas, 2015. "Consistency of Nonparametric Classification in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 85-100, March.
    14. Yinyin Chen & Steven Culpepper & Feng Liang, 2020. "A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 121-153, March.
    15. Steven Andrew Culpepper & Yinghan Chen, 2019. "Development and Application of an Exploratory Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(1), pages 3-24, February.
    16. Guanhua Fang & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2019. "On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 19-40, March.
    17. Rajeev Kohli & Kamel Jedidi, 2005. "Probabilistic Subset Conjunction," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 737-757, December.
    18. Matthias Davier & Shelby Haberman, 2014. "Hierarchical Diagnostic Classification Models Morphing into Unidimensional ‘Diagnostic’ Classification Models—A Commentary," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 340-346, April.
    19. Michel Meulders & Paul Boeck & Iven Mechelen, 2003. "A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions for probability matrix decomposition models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 61-77, March.
    20. Jimmy de la Torre & Xue-Lan Qiu & Kevin Carl Santos, 2022. "An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 693-724, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:33:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00357-016-9202-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.