IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v21y2024i4d10.1007_s12208-024-00409-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of taboo level on emotional versus rational user-generated messages

Author

Listed:
  • Andinet Worku Gebreselassie

    (Addis Ababa University–School of Commerce)

  • Roger Bougie

    (Tilburg University - Tias School for Business and Society)

Abstract

In least developed countries (LDCs), a multitude of social challenges persists, including child abuse, HIV/AIDS, and female genital mutilation. The taboo nature of these issues complicates efforts to address them, as it hinders open dialogue and communication, thereby preventing the necessary changes in behavior that can lead to meaningful progress. This article examines the impact of different types of communication appeals on behavioral intentions when addressing strong versus moderate taboos. Using a between-subjects experimental design (taboo level: strong/moderate × appeal type: humor/rational), this study contributes to the scarce research on this topic by showing that the effectiveness of different communication appeals is contingent on the level of taboo surrounding the issue. Specifically, our findings indicate that humor-based appeals outperform rational appeals when addressing strong taboo topics, whereas for moderate taboo issues, both humor and rational appeals are equally effective. These findings contribute to existing marketing literature and suggest that social marketers in LDCs may benefit from adapting their communication strategies to the level of taboo surrounding social issues in order to effectively deal with socially sensitive issues. Hence, this study offers valuable insights for both scholars and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Andinet Worku Gebreselassie & Roger Bougie, 2024. "The influence of taboo level on emotional versus rational user-generated messages," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(4), pages 999-1025, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:21:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00409-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-024-00409-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-024-00409-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-024-00409-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabri, Ouidade & Obermiller, Carl, 2012. "Consumer perception of taboo in ads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 869-873.
    2. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Dahl, Darren W. & Frankenberger, Kristina D. & Manchanda, Rajesh V., 2003. "Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Nonshocking Advertising Content among University Students," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 268-280, September.
    4. Beatriz Casais & Aline Costa Pereira, 2021. "The prevalence of emotional and rational tone in social advertising appeals," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 282-294, May.
    5. Calder, Bobby J & Phillips, Lynn W & Tybout, Alice M, 1981. "Designing Research for Application," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 197-207, September.
    6. Gebreselassie, Andinet Worku, 2019. "On communicating about taboo social issues in least developed countries : The case of Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb35ee74-fdd7-4220-af92-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. McKay-Nesbitt, Jane & Manchanda, Rajesh V. & Smith, Malcolm C. & Huhmann, Bruce A., 2011. "Effects of age, need for cognition, and affective intensity on advertising effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 12-17, January.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:51-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    10. Martin Eisend, 2011. "How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 115-132, June.
    11. Kim-Shyan Fam & David Waller & Zhilin Yang, 2009. "Addressing the Advertising of Controversial Products in China: An Empirical Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 43-58, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gebreselassie, Andinet Worku, 2019. "On communicating about taboo social issues in least developed countries : The case of Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb35ee74-fdd7-4220-af92-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Katarzyna Bachnik & Robert Nowacki, 2018. "How to Build Consumer Trust: Socially Responsible or Controversial Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Ouidade Sabri, 2017. "Does Viral Communication Context Increase the Harmfulness of Controversial Taboo Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 235-247, March.
    4. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    5. Alpert, Mark I. & Alpert, Judy I. & Maltz, Elliot N., 2005. "Purchase occasion influence on the role of music in advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 369-376, March.
    6. Heribert Gierl & Julia Koncz, 2007. "Unternehmenswachstum und Internationalität als Qualitätssignale," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 389-409, January.
    7. Park, Meungguk & Turner, Brian A. & Pastore, Donna L., 2008. "Effective Public Service Advertisements to Attract Volunteers for the Special Olympics: An Elaboration Likelihood Perspective," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 165-192, September.
    8. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Vassiliki Grougiou & George Balabanis & Danae Manika, 2020. "Does Humour Influence Perceptions of the Ethicality of Female-Disparaging Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Karim BEN YAHIA & Soukeina TOUITI & Mourad TOUZANI, 2016. "Cultural congruency and shocking buzz campaigns: contrasting the opinions of professionals and consumers," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(3), pages 20-33.
    11. Myers, Susan D. & Deitz, George D. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Jha, Subhash & Tatara, Jennifer H., 2020. "An eye-tracking study of attention to brand-identifying content and recall of taboo advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 176-186.
    12. Sharma, Varinder M. & Klein, Andreas, 2020. "Consumer perceived value, involvement, trust, susceptibility to interpersonal influence, and intention to participate in online group buying," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Efrat, Kalanit & Souchon, Anne L. & Dickenson, Peter & Nemkova, Ekaterina, 2021. "Chutzpadik advertising and its effectiveness: Four studies of agencies and audiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 601-613.
    14. Ivana Kursan Milakovic & Mirela Mihic, 2015. "Predictors And Outcome Of Attitudes Towards Advertising: Demographics, Personal Factors And Wom," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 24(2), pages 409-432, december.
    15. Macías Washington & Cerviño Julio, 2017. "Trademark dilution: comparing the effects of blurring and tarnishment cases over brand equity," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 346-360, September.
    16. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    17. Claeys, An-Sofie & Cauberghe, Verolien, 2014. "What makes crisis response strategies work? The impact of crisis involvement and message framing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 182-189.
    18. Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Painesis, Grigorios, 2022. "Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 524-539.
    19. Funk, Daniel C. & Pritchard, Mark P., 2006. "Sport publicity: Commitment's moderation of message effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 613-621, May.
    20. Kristina Auxtova & Mary Brennan & Stephen Dunne, 2021. "To Be or Not to Be Governed Like That? Harmful and/or Offensive Advertising Complaints in the United Kingdom’s (Self-) Regulatory Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 425-446, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:21:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00409-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.