IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v22y2020i5d10.1007_s10796-019-09922-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Antunes

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Jose A. Pino

    (Universidad de Chile)

  • Mary Tate

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Alistair Barros

    (Queensland University of Technology)

Abstract

There are often gaps between the lived experiences of end users and the official version of processes as espoused by the organization. To understand and address these gaps, we propose and evaluate process stories, a method to capture knowledge from end users based on organizational storytelling and visual narrative theories. The method addresses two dimensions related to business processes: 1) coordination knowledge, explaining how activities enfold over time; and 2) contextual knowledge, explaining how coordination depends on other contingency factors. The method is evaluated by comparing process stories against process models officially supported by the participating organizations. The results suggest that process stories identify more activities, events, and actors than official processes, which are supported by a diversity of contextual elements. We then qualitatively analyse these elements to identify the contributions of process stories to process knowledge. Based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis, we draw several implications for business process management.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 2020. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1179-1201, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-019-09922-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09922-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-019-09922-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-019-09922-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa Hashmi & Guido Governatori & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2016. "Normative requirements for regulatory compliance: An abstract formal framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 429-455, June.
    2. Jörg Becker & Nico Clever & Justus Holler & Maria Neumann, 2018. "Business Process Management in the Manufacturing Industry: ERP Replacement and ISO 9001 Recertification Supported by the icebricks Method," Management for Professionals, in: Jan vom Brocke & Jan Mendling (ed.), Business Process Management Cases, pages 413-429, Springer.
    3. Roger Tregear, 2015. "Business Process Standardization," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 2, edition 2, pages 421-441, Springer.
    4. Aguilar-Saven, R.S.Ruth Sara, 2004. "Business process modelling: Review and framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 129-149, July.
    5. Jan Brocke & Jan Mendling, 2018. "Frameworks for Business Process Management: A Taxonomy for Business Process Management Cases," Management for Professionals, in: Jan vom Brocke & Jan Mendling (ed.), Business Process Management Cases, pages 1-17, Springer.
    6. Wil Aalst & Marcello La Rosa & Flávia Santoro, 2016. "Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 1-6, February.
    7. Stefan Oppl & Nancy Alexopoulou, 2016. "Linking Natural Modeling to Techno-centric Modeling for the Active Involvement of Process Participants in Business Process Design," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Youcef Baghdadi, 2014. "Modelling business process with services: towards agile enterprises," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 410-433.
    9. Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    10. Jan Recker & Jan Mendling, 2016. "The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 55-72, February.
    11. Jan Recker & Jan Mendling, 2016. "The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 55-72, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Mertens & Frederik Gailly & Diederik Sassenbroeck & Geert Poels, 2022. "Integrated Declarative Process and Decision Discovery of the Emergency Care Process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 305-327, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 0. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    2. Ulrich Matthias König & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2019. "Why do business processes deviate? Results from a Delphi study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 425-453, December.
    3. Kathrin Figl, 2017. "Comprehension of Procedural Visual Business Process Models," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(1), pages 41-67, February.
    4. Patrick Afflerbach & Manuel Bolsinger & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "An economic decision model for determining the appropriate level of business process standardization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 335-375, August.
    5. Marie-Sophie Denner & Louis Christian Püschel & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "How to Exploit the Digitalization Potential of Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 331-349, August.
    6. Georgi Dimov Kerpedzhiev & Ulrich Matthias König & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Rosemann, 2021. "An Exploration into Future Business Process Management Capabilities in View of Digitalization," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(2), pages 83-96, April.
    7. Martin Lehnert & Maximilian Röglinger & Johannes Seyfried, 2018. "Prioritization of Interconnected Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(2), pages 95-114, April.
    8. Jan Brocke & Marie-Sophie Baier & Theresa Schmiedel & Katharina Stelzl & Maximilian Röglinger & Charlotte Wehking, 2021. "Context-Aware Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(5), pages 533-550, October.
    9. Haluk Demirkan & James C. Spohrer, 2016. "Emerging service orientations and transformations (SOT)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 407-411, June.
    10. Vergidis, K. & Tiwari, A. & Majeed, B. & Roy, R., 2007. "Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 105-121, September.
    11. Oliver Thomas & Simon Hagen & Ulrich Frank & Jan Recker & Lauri Wessel & Friedemann Kammler & Novica Zarvic & Ingo Timm, 2020. "Global Crises and the Role of BISE," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 385-396, August.
    12. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2024. "Managing Dynamics in and Around Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 533-540, October.
    13. Pompeu Casanovas & Louis de Koker & Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    14. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    15. Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "On Modelling Process Aspects With Deontic Event-Calculus," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Dehua Gao & Flaminio Squazzoni & Xiuquan Deng, 2018. "The role of cognitive artifacts in organizational routine dynamics: an agent-based model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 473-499, December.
    17. Verena Wolf & Christian Bartelheimer & Daniel Beverungen, 2020. "Workarounds as Generative Mechanisms for Restructuring and Redesigning Organizations - Insights from a Multiple Case Study," Working Papers Dissertations 68, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    18. Wil M. P. Aalst & Jörg Becker & Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Jens Dibbern & Ulrich Frank & Ulrich Hasenkamp & Armin Heinzl & Oliver Hinz & Kai-Lung Hui & Matthias Jarke & Dimitris Karagiannis &, 2018. "Views on the Past, Present, and Future of Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(6), pages 443-477, December.
    19. Hercules Sant Ana da Silva Jose & Claudia Cappelli & Flavia Maria Santoro & Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo, 2020. "Implementation of Aspect-oriented Business Process Models with Web Services," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 561-584, December.
    20. Tobias Wuttke & Thomas Haskamp & Michael Perscheid & Falk Uebernickel, 2024. "Building the Processes Behind the Product: How Digital Ventures Create Business Processes That Support Their Growth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 565-583, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-019-09922-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.