IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v6y2014i4p191-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Beverungen

Abstract

Much of the BPM literature views business process design and implementation as a top-down process that is built on strategic alignment and managerial control. While this view has enabled the design of many IT artifacts for business processes, it is inconsistent with the observation that information infrastructures, including a company’s business process infrastructure, are at drift, a term that refers to the lack of top-down management control. The paper contributes to resolving this inconsistency by developing a meta-framework that conceptualizes business processes as emergent organizational routines that are represented, enabled, and constrained by IT artifacts. IT artifacts are developed in processes of functional-hierarchical decomposition and social design processes. Organizational routines have ostensive and performative aspects, forming a mutually constitutive duality. A literature review demonstrates that the propositions offered by the meta-framework have been insufficiently considered in the BPM field. The paper concludes with an outlook to applying the meta-framework to theorize about the interplay of design projects with the subsequent emergence of business processes in organizations. Copyright Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:191-202
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-014-0335-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12599-014-0335-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-014-0335-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langlois, Richard N., 2002. "Modularity in technology and organization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 19-37, September.
    2. Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2007. "Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 340-362, September.
    3. Markus C. Becker, 2004. "Organizational routines: a review of the literature," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(4), pages 643-678, August.
    4. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    5. Frances X. Frei & Ravi Kalakota & Andrew J. Leone & Leslie M. Marx, 1999. "Process Variation as a Determinant of Bank Performance: Evidence from the Retail Banking Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1210-1220, September.
    6. Markus C. Becker, 2004. "Organizational routines : a review of the literature," Post-Print hal-00279010, HAL.
    7. Paul Harmon, 2010. "The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pages 37-81, Springer.
    8. Michael Hammer, 2010. "What is Business Process Management?," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pages 3-16, Springer.
    9. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    10. Gerald C. Kane & Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, 2011. "IS Avoidance in Health-Care Groups: A Multilevel Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 504-522, September.
    11. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    12. N/A, 1970. "Note," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 2(4), pages 1-1, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dehua Gao & Flaminio Squazzoni & Xiuquan Deng, 2018. "The role of cognitive artifacts in organizational routine dynamics: an agent-based model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 473-499, December.
    2. Ulrich Matthias König & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2019. "Why do business processes deviate? Results from a Delphi study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 425-453, December.
    3. Patrick Afflerbach & Manuel Bolsinger & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "An economic decision model for determining the appropriate level of business process standardization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 335-375, August.
    4. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 2020. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1179-1201, October.
    5. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 0. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    6. Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller & Martin Matzner & Jan Mendling & Jan Brocke, 2019. "Conceptualizing smart service systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(1), pages 7-18, March.
    7. Aygun Shafagatova & Amy Van Looy & Simin Maleki Shamasbi, 2023. "Uncovering the Combined Impact of Process Characteristics and Reward Types on Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A European Quantitative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    8. Tobias Wuttke & Thomas Haskamp & Michael Perscheid & Falk Uebernickel, 2024. "Building the Processes Behind the Product: How Digital Ventures Create Business Processes That Support Their Growth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 565-583, October.
    9. Oliver Thomas & Simon Hagen & Ulrich Frank & Jan Recker & Lauri Wessel & Friedemann Kammler & Novica Zarvic & Ingo Timm, 2020. "Global Crises and the Role of BISE," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 385-396, August.
    10. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2024. "Managing Dynamics in and Around Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 533-540, October.
    11. Ralf Plattfaut, 2022. "On the Importance of Project Management Capabilities for Sustainable Business Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    13. Daniel Beverungen & Joos C. A. M. Buijs & Jörg Becker & Claudio Ciccio & Wil M. P. Aalst & Christian Bartelheimer & Jan Brocke & Marco Comuzzi & Karsten Kraume & Henrik Leopold & Martin Matzner & Jan , 2021. "Seven Paradoxes of Business Process Management in a Hyper-Connected World," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(2), pages 145-156, April.
    14. Verena Wolf & Christian Bartelheimer & Daniel Beverungen, 2020. "Workarounds as Generative Mechanisms for Restructuring and Redesigning Organizations - Insights from a Multiple Case Study," Working Papers Dissertations 68, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Maximilian Röglinger & Ralf Plattfaut & Vincent Borghoff & Georgi Kerpedzhiev & Jörg Becker & Daniel Beverungen & Jan Brocke & Amy Looy & Adela del-Río-Ortega & Stefanie Rinderle-Ma & Michael Rosemann, 2022. "Exogenous Shocks and Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(5), pages 669-687, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Volkoff & Diane M. Strong & Michael B. Elmes, 2007. "Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 832-848, October.
    2. Yukika Awazu & Stefania Mariano & Sue Newell, 2019. "The mediating role of artifacts in position practice at work: Examples from a project-based context," Post-Print hal-02110757, HAL.
    3. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    4. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    5. Jie Mein Goh & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2011. "Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 565-585, September.
    6. Tiziana Callari & Corinne Bieder & Barry Kirwan, 2019. "What is it like for a middle manager to take safety into account? Practices and challenges," Post-Print hal-01935746, HAL.
    7. Michiel Bal & Jos Benders & Lander Vermeerbergen, 2022. "‘Bringing the Covert into the Open’: A Case Study on Technology Appropriation and Continuous Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
    10. Verena Wolf & Christian Bartelheimer & Daniel Beverungen, 2020. "Workarounds as Generative Mechanisms for Restructuring and Redesigning Organizations - Insights from a Multiple Case Study," Working Papers Dissertations 68, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    11. Verstegen, Luuk & Houkes, Wybo & Reymen, Isabelle, 2019. "Configuring collective digital-technology usage in dynamic and complex design practices," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2753 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville, 2005. "The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 618-636, December.
    14. Sébastien Tran, 2010. "Quand les TIC réussissent trop bien dans les organisations : le cas du courrier électronique chez les managers," Post-Print halshs-00638824, HAL.
    15. Valor, Josep & Sieber, Sandra, 2003. "Uses and attitudes of young people toward technology and mobile telephony," IESE Research Papers D/505, IESE Business School.
    16. Englund, Hans & Gerdin, Jonas, 2011. "Agency and structure in management accounting research: Reflections and extensions of Kilfoyle and Richardson," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 581-592.
    17. Pier Vittorio Mannucci, 2017. "Drawing Snow White and Animating Buzz Lightyear: Technological Toolkit Characteristics and Creativity in Cross-Disciplinary Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 711-728, August.
    18. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    19. Sarason, Yolanda & Dean, Tom & Dillard, Jesse F., 2006. "Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 286-305, May.
    20. Olivier Desplebin & Gulliver Lux, 2018. "The evolution of accounting, control, audit and their practices through the prism of the Blockchain: a prospective reflection [L'évolution de la comptabilité, du contrôle, de l'audit et de leurs mé," Post-Print hal-01907902, HAL.
    21. Adel Beldi & Walid Cheffi & Frédéric Wacheux, 2006. "L'utilisation de l'information comptable par les managers. Proposition d'une grille d'analyse fondée sur la théorie de la structuration," Post-Print halshs-00548085, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:191-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.