IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i8d10.1007_s13198-024-02365-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability assessment of emergency safety barriers based on an intuitionistic fuzzy sets aggregation procedure and subjective safety analysis: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Samia Daas

    (University of Batna 2)

  • Fares Innal

    (Université 20 Août 1955 Skikda)

Abstract

The Emergency safety barrier is one of the active technical barriers related to the safety of liquefied petroleum gas storage tanks. However, this study assesses the reliability of emergency safety barriers to help decision-makers understand how they can support decisions to reduce the risks associated with LPG storage. This paper aims to develop an integrated approach that uses an intuitionistic fuzzy sets aggregation procedure, subjective safety analysis, and emergency event tree analysis to handle uncertainty in the reliability assessment of emergency safety barriers. In addition, a case study on the reliability assessment of the emergency safety barriers of the LPG plant in Algeria based on the proposed methodology is provided and carried out to illustrate its effectiveness and feasibility. The results demonstrated the ability of intuitionistic fuzzy sets aggregation procedure and subjective safety analysis to provide highly reliable results and evaluate the reliability of emergency safety barriers. However, the classical event tree analysis does not consider the possibility of assessing the emergency consequences of different accident scenarios. Consequently, it only allows you to estimate the occurrence probability of accident scenarios. The results of this study show that the reliability of emergency safety barriers can be used to estimate the probability of emergency consequences under different accident scenarios, improve reliability, and help prioritize emergency improvement measures. The study provides scientific and operational references for analyzing the emergency consequences of various accident scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Samia Daas & Fares Innal, 2024. "Reliability assessment of emergency safety barriers based on an intuitionistic fuzzy sets aggregation procedure and subjective safety analysis: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 4143-4161, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02365-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02365-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02365-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02365-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Landucci, Gabriele & Argenti, Francesca & Tugnoli, Alessandro & Cozzani, Valerio, 2015. "Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 30-43.
    2. Mohammad Yazdi & Farzaneh Nikfar & Mahnaz Nasrabadi, 2017. "Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1177-1193, November.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L. & Shang, Jennifer S., 2011. "An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 703-715, November.
    4. Hongyang Yu & Faisal Khan & Brian Veitch, 2017. "A Flexible Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Technique for Risk Analysis of Major Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(9), pages 1668-1682, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Wanyi & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang, 2024. "A novel methodology to quantify the impact of safety barriers on maritime operational risk based on a probabilistic network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    3. Laobing Zhang & Gabriele Landucci & Genserik Reniers & Nima Khakzad & Jianfeng Zhou, 2018. "DAMS: A Model to Assess Domino Effects by Using Agent‐Based Modeling and Simulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1585-1600, August.
    4. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Yang Tang & Jiajia Jing & Zhidong Zhang & Yan Yang, 2017. "A Quantitative Risk Analysis Method for the High Hazard Mechanical System in Petroleum and Petrochemical Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Zhou, Jianfeng & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "Petri-net based cooperation modeling and time analysis of emergency response in the context of domino effect prevention in process industries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Guizhen Zhang & Vinh V. Thai & Adrian Wing‐Keung Law & Kum Fai Yuen & Hui Shan Loh & Qingji Zhou, 2020. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Seafarers’ Nonfatal Injuries Due to Occupational Accidents Based on Bayesian Network Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 8-23, January.
    8. Khakzad, Nima, 2021. "Optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects: Methodologies based on dynamic influence diagram and mathematical programming," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Jianfei Shen & Fengyun Li & Di Shi & Hongze Li & Xinhua Yu, 2018. "Factors Affecting the Economics of Distributed Natural Gas-Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Systems in China: A Systematic Analysis Based on the Integrated Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Labo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Weiliang Qiao & Yu Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & Yang Liu, 2020. "Human Factors Analysis for Maritime Accidents Based on a Dynamic Fuzzy Bayesian Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 957-980, May.
    11. Singh, Kritika & Maiti, J, 2020. "A novel data mining approach for analysis of accident paths and performance assessment of risk control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Khakzad, Nima, 2023. "A methodology based on Dijkstra's algorithm and mathematical programming for optimal evacuation in process plants in the event of major tank fires," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Casson Moreno, Valeria & Guglielmi, Daniele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2018. "Identification of critical safety barriers in biogas facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 81-94.
    14. Jianfeng Zhou & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "Probabilistic Analysis of Domino Effects by Using a Matrix‐Based Simulation Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(10), pages 1913-1927, October.
    15. Corinne Curt & Jean‐Marc Tacnet, 2018. "Resilience of Critical Infrastructures: Review and Analysis of Current Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2441-2458, November.
    16. Jiachen Sun & Haiyan Wang & Zhimin Cui, 2023. "Alleviating the Bauxite Maritime Supply Chain Risks through Resilient Strategies: QFD-MCDM with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    18. BahooToroody, Ahmad & De Carlo, Filippo & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Tucci, Mario & Van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., 2020. "Bayesian regression based condition monitoring approach for effective reliability prediction of random processes in autonomous energy supply operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Jiajun Ma & Guohua Chen & Tao Zeng & Lixing Zhou & Jie Zhao & Yuanfei Zhao, 2023. "Methodology for Resilience Assessment of Oil Pipeline Network System Exposed to Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Yunmeng Lu & Tiantian Wang & Tiezhong Liu, 2020. "Bayesian Network-Based Risk Analysis of Chemical Plant Explosion Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02365-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.